Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DashLynx

a 302 in my runner???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-12-2007, 07:46 PM
  #21  
SR5
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
SR5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
also do guys think i would need to re-gear
Old 06-12-2007, 07:48 PM
  #22  
SR5
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
SR5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
sorry about the millions of questions i just wanna make sure that this is something i can do and would want to do
Old 06-12-2007, 07:49 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
toy power's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if you put a sbf in that truck, i would def go with a 351 unless you come across a deal on a 302. a 351 will stomp a 302 into the ground. 302 also has 5/16 rod bolts which will break if it gets wrung out too far. no substitute for cubic inches.
Old 06-12-2007, 07:58 PM
  #24  
SR5
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
SR5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
ya but a 351 is harder to mount do to the distributer being in the back
clearance problems with firewall
Old 06-12-2007, 08:02 PM
  #25  
Registered User
 
881stGenRunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,584
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Advance Adapters - http://72.20.96.178/commerce/ccpc109...016-713016.htm
Old 06-12-2007, 08:03 PM
  #26  
Registered User
 
4runnerx3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
351 not 350
Old 06-12-2007, 08:07 PM
  #27  
SR5
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
SR5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by 881stGenRunner
i was just reading up on that and it said that kit was only for a 4cylder
and it said i needed a min of 3'' lift
is all that right?
Old 06-12-2007, 08:08 PM
  #28  
Registered User
 
881stGenRunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,584
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
ya i guess so, sorry about that dude
Old 06-12-2007, 08:11 PM
  #29  
SR5
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
SR5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
no prob
Old 06-12-2007, 08:20 PM
  #30  
Contributing Member
 
Jay351's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: maple ridge, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 9,055
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Stock v6 rad flows enough to cool a chevy 350.
A little 302 would be find.
Electric fan might be a smart investment though..
Old 06-12-2007, 08:24 PM
  #31  
SR5
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
SR5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Jay351
Stock v6 rad flows enough to cool a chevy 350.
A little 302 would be find.
Electric fan might be a smart investment though..
realy, well that saves me some time and money,
-thanx
Old 06-12-2007, 08:25 PM
  #32  
SR5
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
SR5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
last qustion, ( I HOPE )
do i need a lift to drop in a 302
Old 06-12-2007, 08:26 PM
  #33  
CJM
Registered User
 
CJM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 4,940
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Chevy 350, much more accesseries, better power and easier to do since its been done alot. Also really easy to find them, considering every damn chevy V8 has a 350 in it pretty much.
Old 06-12-2007, 08:32 PM
  #34  
Contributing Member
 
Jay351's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: maple ridge, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 9,055
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
I think to be on the safe side you might have to do a 1-2" body lift but im NOT sure about that.
Old 06-12-2007, 10:26 PM
  #35  
Registered User
 
the_gunslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if you've got the $$ do the LS2. tons of power, easy fuel injection (good point about hills) and parts are plentiful. say $6k for a running engine, and drop a t-56 out of a camaro behind it. 4wd burnouts sound like fun?
Old 06-13-2007, 04:32 AM
  #36  
Registered User
 
curtiswyant's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...seems stupid unless you already have or can get a cheap-o running 302. I wouldn't bother with a tranny adapter, just use a Mustang T5. The location of the trans mount etc is going to change so keeping your stock trans won't really help much. Definitely go with a carb. 302's are long motors so keep that in mind, you might have to relocate the radiator or mess with the firewall. Have you done an engine swap before? Think about how much money you will need then multiply it by 3!!! Here's some stuff to ponder:
radiator/fan clearance (will probably have to go electric)
new wiring spliced into old harness
new driveshaft
new trans mount/crossmember
motor mounts?
floor pan/trans tunnel clearance
oil pan/steering clearance (front sump vs rear sump)
exhaust header/manifold clearance
fuel line/fuel pump
throttle linkage
clutch linkage
fan shroud

etc etc etc
Old 06-13-2007, 05:04 AM
  #37  
Contributing Member
 
X-AWDriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Littleton,CO
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also consider emissions testing if that applies to you and will the Toyota rearend and driveline handle the extra power. I also vote for FI over carbs if you can afford it.
Old 06-13-2007, 07:27 AM
  #38  
Contributing Member
 
Jay351's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: maple ridge, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 9,055
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by curtiswyant
...seems stupid unless you already have or can get a cheap-o running 302. I wouldn't bother with a tranny adapter, just use a Mustang T5. The location of the trans mount etc is going to change so keeping your stock trans won't really help much. Definitely go with a carb. 302's are long motors so keep that in mind, you might have to relocate the radiator or mess with the firewall. Have you done an engine swap before? Think about how much money you will need then multiply it by 3!!! Here's some stuff to ponder:
radiator/fan clearance (will probably have to go electric)
new wiring spliced into old harness
new driveshaft
new trans mount/crossmember
motor mounts?
floor pan/trans tunnel clearance
oil pan/steering clearance (front sump vs rear sump)
exhaust header/manifold clearance
fuel line/fuel pump
throttle linkage
clutch linkage
fan shroud

etc etc etc

How do you suppose he mates his transfercase to a mustang tranny?

The v6 tranny is plenty strong. Make it work.
the v6 drivetrain has been known to hold up with v8's... if you are not thrashing on it all the time..
Old 06-13-2007, 07:41 AM
  #39  
Registered User
 
dijlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: fl
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
but who wouldnt wanna thrash that arond all the time?

id personally go with efi, carbs may be easier yada yada yada, but if u dont know what ur doin ur gonna screw it up. seems like u may know at least the basics, but efi seems like a better choice to me. of course im pretty happy with the power level of my 22re too... lol
Old 06-13-2007, 08:06 AM
  #40  
Registered User
 
Man4God's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok, I am a Ford guy through and through. I bleed Ford Blue. If it were my rig, I would definately go with the 302 EFI out of a 5.0 Mustang. There are tons of motors out there. I would look for an 87 (California Model) through 92 5.0 HO motor. They have the MAF sensor which was a huge improvement over the earlier Speed Density EFI systems and those year motors were forged from the factory. Crank, rods and pistons. You could easily slap a 250 shot on those 302s and it would last 40K before poping a head gasket.

Bone stock, they put out anywhere from 225-240 HP and a rock solid 300 ft/lb of torque. I very much doubt ANYONE would need more than that for a trail rig. And, if it is daily driver, definately gear it down. The 302 is just like the 3.4 where the lower the cruising RPMs, the better the fuel economy. And with all the torque on demand at a low RPM, there is no reason NOT to be running taller gears.

I would stay away from the 302 truck motors mainly because they don't have the power of the EFI 302 out of the Mustangs. But definately stay with EFI and put an electric fan on the radiator.

I don't know jack about the swap but I would imagine that it wouldn't be horrible. If I were to do anything else, it would be an LS1 swap. But then you are playing with a lot of power and, in my opinion, GM reliability. The LS series of motors are known to bend pushrods if over revved or a gear is missed. If you stay with a Slush Box, then that probably won't be a problem.

Just my $.02.


Quick Reply: a 302 in my runner???



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:42 PM.