Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

3.0 to 22re 'downgrade'?

Old Oct 24, 2007 | 03:40 AM
  #1  
misterzee's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 684
Likes: 2
From: North Georgia
3.0 to 22re 'downgrade'?

How tuff would it be to remove the (locked up) 3.0 from a 90 4Runner (5spd) and put a 22re in there? Has anyone done it? I know it would not be a rocket, but I prefer life with a 22r over a 3.0. I searched for a little while but did not turn up an article.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 04:16 AM
  #2  
jasond's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
You would have to weld in new motor mounts (different location) and get a trans crossmember for a 22r truck, or use the r150 and find a r151 bellhousing to make it fit. A pain for a little bit less power. Just save up for the 5vz.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 04:27 AM
  #3  
04 Rocko Taco's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 0
If your ditching the 3.0, I would just go for a 3.4 swap, but man do I love my 22R, so I know what you mean. I def would NOT waste the time rebuilding that 3.0 though.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 04:36 AM
  #4  
waskillywabbit's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3
Likes: 20
If cost is not an issue do the 3.4, but it is hard to beat a 22RE.

Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 05:30 AM
  #5  
InternetRoadkill's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 6
From: San Antonio, Texas
Swapping to a 22RE would be an upgrade.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 05:49 AM
  #6  
eightnine's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Ontario
Originally Posted by InternetRoadkill
Swapping to a 22RE would be an upgrade.
x2
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 06:07 AM
  #7  
RustBucket's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,804
Likes: 25
From: Atlanta
On the flip side, how difficult would it be to take a regular 22re/5pd 4runner and swap the V6 5/spd into it?
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 12:46 PM
  #8  
n4ynu1010's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 1
From: Richmond , Va / Henrico Co.
Mo cylinders is better
Down with 3.0 flaming
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007 | 09:19 PM
  #9  
gametom's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: Manhattan IL
22r or re is the way to go
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 06:53 AM
  #10  
n4ynu1010's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 1
From: Richmond , Va / Henrico Co.
Originally Posted by n4ynu1010
Mo cylinders is better
Down with 3.0 flaming
Originally Posted by gametom
22r or re is the way to go
HEHEHE
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 07:05 AM
  #11  
04 Rocko Taco's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by n4ynu1010
Mo cylinders is better
Down with 3.0 flaming
I'll take my little 4 cylinder'ed solid motor anyday over a 6 cylinder'ed timebomb.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 08:13 AM
  #12  
n4ynu1010's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 1
From: Richmond , Va / Henrico Co.
Originally Posted by 04 Rocko Taco
I'll take my little 4 cylinder'ed solid motor anyday over a 6 cylinder'ed timebomb.
Mine runs like a scalded dog and purs like a baby kitty , can't get any better than that
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 01:14 PM
  #13  
eightnine's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Ontario
mine gets pretty good gas milage and is pretty torquey plus doesnt eat headgaskets for breakfast lunch and dinner
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 03:59 PM
  #14  
CoedNaked's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Originally Posted by waskillywabbit
If cost is not an issue do the 3.4, but it is hard to beat a 22RE.


Actually it's easty to beat a 22RE. All you need is a 3vze.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 04:02 PM
  #15  
Jay351's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,055
Likes: 10
From: maple ridge, British Columbia, Canada
Originally Posted by CoedNaked
Actually it's easty to beat a 22RE. All you need is a 3vze.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007 | 05:01 PM
  #16  
eightnine's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Ontario
Originally Posted by CoedNaked
Actually it's easty to beat a 22RE. All you need is a 3vze.
are we all talking about the same 3vze here?
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2007 | 06:58 AM
  #17  
MonsterMaxx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 614
Likes: 1
From: Greenville, SC
Originally Posted by eightnine
are we all talking about the same 3vze here?
I think he's talking about using the huge mass of the 3.turd to physically smash the 22r. Like using a sledge hammer to smash things.


+1 on do the 3.4 swap

Last edited by MonsterMaxx; Oct 26, 2007 at 07:01 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2007 | 07:49 AM
  #18  
ydopen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 211
Likes: 1
From: Brandon Ms
22R For the Win!!!!!!!
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2007 | 08:52 AM
  #19  
ToyotaGuru's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Yorktown, Va
I am doing the 22R swap instead of 3.0 for a number of reasons.
1) Cost I have a collection of 5 22REs
2) 22E Rock solid design and life. 3.0 are likes Ford you either Hate'm or Love'm.
3) I have a 3.0 right now without a HeadGasket problem, It has the other 3.0 problem the death knock. These things throw rods.
4) Look into the machine cost aloneto rebuild a 3.0 and 22R and for that price you can buy a rebuilt 22R.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2007 | 09:35 AM
  #20  
Tacoclimber's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,659
Likes: 0
From: Between a rock and a hard place, AZ
Just to pad my post count...

I've never owned a 3.0. But I have owned a 22R, a 22RE, and the 2.7l 4cyl (The heir apparent to the 22R. Absolutely great engines. If I had a 3.0, I'd probably swap to a 22R, too.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:26 PM.