22re to v6 tranny
#2
No. The 22RE engine and tranny have different bolt patterns than the V6 tranny.
If you could get your hand on a R151F bellhousing(or whole tranny) then it would work. The 22RTE came with a V6 style tranny, so it has a bellhousing to adapt between the two.
If you could get your hand on a R151F bellhousing(or whole tranny) then it would work. The 22RTE came with a V6 style tranny, so it has a bellhousing to adapt between the two.
#3
Thanks
#6
I was under the impression that the turbo was only out as an intern measure: to compete with Nissans new V6 while Toyota finished up their V6. So when the 3VZE debuted in '88 they turbo was dropped. I could be wrong on the termination date, but I've just never seen or heard of an '88 turbo.
#7
I went to car-part.com and searched for an 88 truck engine, that netted me that discovery. Then I thought to look for the transmission, which resulted in only 4x2 w/turbo. I know that thier database is extremely reliable. I have used it on several occasions for cross-reference and part location for my rig (an 88 V6, many parts shared between turbo) and others. I know of many yards who use that software to inventory/organize thier product.
Last edited by MudHippy; Apr 9, 2007 at 10:55 AM.
Trending Topics
#8
#9
I agree, car-part is pretty good, but it's kind of like referancing Wikipedia. Not exactly rock solid evidence.
If there was a turbo in '88 it makes sence that it would be only in the 2wd as the 4x4 alwasy gets the new toys. However, 2wd trannyies are different than 4wd trannies, so you're still needing to look for a 86-87 4wd turbo tranny.
It'd be the same situation as the R150 used in a Surpa and the R150 used in 4x4's. Same basic tranny, but the guts are just different enough that making them work together is a big job.
If there was a turbo in '88 it makes sence that it would be only in the 2wd as the 4x4 alwasy gets the new toys. However, 2wd trannyies are different than 4wd trannies, so you're still needing to look for a 86-87 4wd turbo tranny.
It'd be the same situation as the R150 used in a Surpa and the R150 used in 4x4's. Same basic tranny, but the guts are just different enough that making them work together is a big job.
#11
Ok the basics:
R-series trannies behind the turbo(in 4x4's) and V6 motors are stronger than the W or G series behind the 2XR series motors. They also use chain driven transfer cases, which are geared a bit lower than the gear driven ones, but are more of a PITA. The R151F in particular has a rediculously low first gear(4.313 vs 3.830 as usual).
Because you have a 2wd, you DO NOT have an R151F. The F is the 4x4 designation. You probably have an R150 transmission(where as most 4x4 turcks have the R150F). The R150 has the same gear ratios as the R150F, it just has a different tail shaft, and the back of the case is different: the R150F can accept a t-case, the R150 cannot.
I'm not 100% that the 2wd used the R150, but I know it did not use the R151F, simply because it's not a 4x4.
R-series trannies behind the turbo(in 4x4's) and V6 motors are stronger than the W or G series behind the 2XR series motors. They also use chain driven transfer cases, which are geared a bit lower than the gear driven ones, but are more of a PITA. The R151F in particular has a rediculously low first gear(4.313 vs 3.830 as usual).
Because you have a 2wd, you DO NOT have an R151F. The F is the 4x4 designation. You probably have an R150 transmission(where as most 4x4 turcks have the R150F). The R150 has the same gear ratios as the R150F, it just has a different tail shaft, and the back of the case is different: the R150F can accept a t-case, the R150 cannot.
I'm not 100% that the 2wd used the R150, but I know it did not use the R151F, simply because it's not a 4x4.
#12
Car-part.com is a mercantile business. There are hundreds of junkyards across this continent who rely on/pay them for providing 100% accurate processing/categorizing of their inventory. They can't afford returned merchandise any more than the consumer can. I have never had any doubt, or any reason to doubt, that what I purchase from a dealer on car-part.com will be exactly the part for whichever application. They have never failed me. How could all those people stay in business if is wasn't rock solid reliable?
Not to mention I've actually had dealers tell me that the system don't lie. If I wan't to swap a part from a different vehicle, it will already have listed ALL compatibilties. Meaning, if they say it will fit, it will. If they don't list it as a swappable part between years/models, IT AIN'T. If they say that Toyota sold turbo 4x2's in 1988, THEY DID!
Now stare at my avatar and repeat...
Last edited by MudHippy; Apr 9, 2007 at 05:49 PM.
#16
I just hope I can pull anywhere close to those kind of mileage numbers with mine. It's fresh off rebuild, and before I was getting 12-13ish. I like the truck, but I drive a lot of highway miles.
#17
don't know if this link will help on if there was a 88 turbo or not
http://www.top4runners.com/ja/runhist1.html
http://www.top4runners.com/ja/runhist1.html
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1uzRunner
84-85 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
63
Nov 10, 2018 03:58 PM
tallsasquatch
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
0
Sep 20, 2015 02:48 PM
shadowbirdie
General Vehicle Related Topics (Non Year Related)
2
Jul 21, 2015 10:38 PM




