Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

k&n vs. Snorkel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-16-2005, 08:22 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
CraZyRunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: bothell, Washington
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
k&n vs. Snorkel

Should i get a k&n fipk system or a safari snorkel for my 95 4runner i just wanted to get some opinions.
Old 10-16-2005, 08:42 PM
  #2  
Contributing Member
 
Lone4runner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Quincy, MA
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if you do some serious off roading a snorkel would do better than a K&N.
Old 10-16-2005, 08:43 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
964runner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Castro Valley, CA
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2 completely different intake systems for 2 different reasons give some backround info
Old 10-16-2005, 08:53 PM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
CraZyRunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: bothell, Washington
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I want to do serious off roading but i also want to have better performance/ gas mileage so i just need to decide i guess.
Old 10-16-2005, 08:55 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Bob_98SR5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 10,036
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
niether will significantly improve your mileage.
Old 10-16-2005, 08:58 PM
  #6  
Banned
 
garrett1478's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
there is a ton of 'serious offroading' that doesnt include deep water crossings, or maybe water at all. you just have to decide what you need. if you think you'll need a snorkel, dont let me discourage you. just dont wait to find out if you need one when its too late and you hydrolock in a stream. also, you could always get a snorkel and k&n filter.
Old 10-16-2005, 09:10 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
6lug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sevierville, TN
Posts: 289
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a snorkel doesnt have to be used, and isnt only intended to be used for, deep water crossings. Depending on what kind of wheeling youre going to be doing, i.e., dusty trails with multiple rigs, dirt back roads, and if your are also dealing with a lot of water that you may need to cross, deep muddin, then go for a snorkel. If you dont plan on doing that, and stick to rocks and mild mud, go for a k&n. thats my opinion.
Old 10-16-2005, 09:12 PM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
CraZyRunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: bothell, Washington
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
alright thanks guys i think ill stick with the k&n
Old 10-17-2005, 04:25 AM
  #9  
Contributing Member
 
Yoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: North Bend, WA
Posts: 2,651
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Son's 85 PU has been hydro'ed twice (that I know of). Last time it threw a rod. Snorkel is practical and costs less than an engine.
Old 10-17-2005, 05:06 AM
  #10  
Sponsoring Vendor
 
Strap22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heres is your solution.........nobody has a better price............

https://www.yotatech.com/forums/show...99&postcount=1
Old 10-17-2005, 05:54 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Racer944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Birmingham, AL WAR EAGLE
Posts: 905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
take it from a guy with a K&N, get anything else. It sounds nice at WOT, but buy strap22's snorkel. They look nice, run colder air and you'll be helping out a fellow yotatecher that always hooks up the online community.
Old 10-17-2005, 01:01 PM
  #12  
Contributing Member
 
BruceTS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CraZyRunner
Should i get a k&n fipk system or a safari snorkel for my 95 4runner i just wanted to get some opinions.
The K&N filter do a lousy job of filtering dust offroad, stock air filter works much better. I just did a review on the True Flow air filter. I'd go that route and add a home built snorkel.....
Old 10-17-2005, 06:18 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
Racer944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Birmingham, AL WAR EAGLE
Posts: 905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BruceTS
The K&N filter do a lousy job of filtering dust offroad, stock air filter works much better. I just did a review on the True Flow air filter. I'd go that route and add a home built snorkel.....
That's exactly what I'm going to do with mine, assuming of course I get a job and money and a 3.4L and twin snorkels and... this whole poor college kid thing sucks
Old 10-19-2005, 03:17 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
6lug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sevierville, TN
Posts: 289
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
twin snorkels????
Old 10-19-2005, 09:52 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
Scottz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I won't run K&N filters. I use to use them all the time but not anymore. Stock is the best thing and is designed by Toyota engineers to give you the best performance. And I said stock Toyota, not Fram or some other filter.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ashamsuddin
General Vehicle Related Topics (Non Year Related)
17
01-13-2023 03:17 AM
RedRunner_87
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
84
06-01-2021 01:51 PM
39 Thieves
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
1
01-06-2017 01:08 PM
mxdw88
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
1
09-20-2015 03:13 AM
priest16
84-85 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
15
08-06-2015 07:43 AM



Quick Reply: k&n vs. Snorkel



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:22 AM.