Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

More on Exhaust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-22-2004, 05:24 PM
  #1  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
trd6209's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
More on Exhaust

I have been looking at the exhaust system that Downey Offroad offers on their website and I was curious as to whether or not anyone has had any experience with this. I am referring the 4WD HIGH PERFORMANCE 2 ½" EXHAUST SYSTEM, with Cat that they offer for $340.00.


I have also noted that a lot of you guys have been talking of reducing the pipes from the catback to 2 1/4 from 2 1/2 stock. How much improvement could I stand to gain by doing this?
Old 06-26-2004, 11:41 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
SoCal4Running's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Oceanside, CA.
Posts: 1,421
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
We were going to get the Downey exhaust, and in fact it was on order till we found out that it was going to take 2 months to get it.

So we had it done locally for 1/2 the cost with the muffler of our choice.
Old 06-26-2004, 12:40 PM
  #3  
Rugby10
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by trd6209
I have been looking at the exhaust system that Downey Offroad offers on their website and I was curious as to whether or not anyone has had any experience with this. I am referring the 4WD HIGH PERFORMANCE 2 ½" EXHAUST SYSTEM, with Cat that they offer for $340.00.


I have also noted that a lot of you guys have been talking of reducing the pipes from the catback to 2 1/4 from 2 1/2 stock. How much improvement could I stand to gain by doing this?
Are you are asking about an exhaust diameter REDUCTION = Better performance? I just want to clarify as I have always thought that the reverse is true.

BTW - I'm moving to Tucson on the First of July, maybe we could meet up.
Old 06-26-2004, 01:04 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
SoCal4Running's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Oceanside, CA.
Posts: 1,421
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
By having a smaller diameter pipe you create some backpressure which helps make torque.

Larger pipes belong on bigger motors that see extended high rpm use where you dont need/want back pressure
Old 06-26-2004, 01:05 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
AznSky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it depends, the whole point of reducing the diamater would be to create more back pressure, with FI vehicles you would want to force out more gas so that's why a greater diamater exit = better performance. However there are some cases where backpressure is good too. I'm not an expert on this so I will let the pros explain.
Old 06-26-2004, 01:24 PM
  #6  
Co-Founder/Administrator
Staff
iTrader: (1)
 
Corey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Auburn, Washington
Posts: 32,242
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts
http://www.dynomax.com/techsupport.stm

On a 3.0 V6 I used 2.25" as recommended by the chart below.
To big of pipe you hurt low end performance, but gain top end.

Big pipes belong on rigs that see a need for high speed.
4x4s going to be going slow on trails need low end torque.
Smaller pipes are favored here.

Old 06-26-2004, 01:41 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
SoCal4Running's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Oceanside, CA.
Posts: 1,421
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Backpressure is a very good thing for smaller motors. Its all about TORQUE.
Old 06-26-2004, 06:56 PM
  #8  
Rugby10
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks for clearing that up guys.
Old 06-26-2004, 07:29 PM
  #9  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
trd6209's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rugby10
Are you are asking about an exhaust diameter REDUCTION = Better performance? I just want to clarify as I have always thought that the reverse is true.

BTW - I'm moving to Tucson on the First of July, maybe we could meet up.

That sounds good. Shoot me an email with your number when you get settled in and I will give you a call.
Old 06-26-2004, 07:31 PM
  #10  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
trd6209's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Corey
http://www.dynomax.com/techsupport.stm

On a 3.0 V6 I used 2.25" as recommended by the chart below.
To big of pipe you hurt low end performance, but gain top end.

Big pipes belong on rigs that see a need for high speed.
4x4s going to be going slow on trails need low end torque.
Smaller pipes are favored here.


I think that's the way that I will go. Thanks for the info.
Old 06-26-2004, 07:34 PM
  #11  
Contributing Member
Thread Starter
 
trd6209's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SoCal4Running
We were going to get the Downey exhaust, and in fact it was on order till we found out that it was going to take 2 months to get it.

So we had it done locally for 1/2 the cost with the muffler of our choice.
So what did you go with for the muffler? I see some guys go with the Flowmaster 40 series and some go with the 50 series. I need to do research to find out what I need.

Also did you drop in a High flow CAT or stick with the standard? Just curious. This is all pretty new to me since I am just getting into the whole thing.
Old 06-26-2004, 08:22 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
jksuperstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Denver
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you're aiming for backpressure, why pay the $$ for hi-flo parts?
Old 06-26-2004, 09:39 PM
  #13  
Contributing Member
 
bulldog-yota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Morgan Hill, CA
Posts: 1,876
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
exhaust systems are similar to inlet systems, it is not about the diameter but creating the right air/gas speed for the right application. That's why lots of manufacturers today have dual or multitrack inlet systems, to create the right flow and air velocity. This principal also applies to the exhaust system, although it is less sensitive (easier to push a gas out than suck it in)

a very simple way of experiencing why different sizes of engines, and different performance categories (normal vs racing, etc) require different diameters, is do the following. Get pipes from 1/4" to about 3" in diameter and at least 3 feet long. Now take a deap breath and blow through each pipe. WHich once could you create the best sense of exhaling quickly and with some force, was it the biggest one? Nope probably somewhere in the middle. Now imagine doing this a couple of thousand times a minute to simulate cylinders of on engine.

Thats why tuners spend huge amounts of time on a flow bench for heads, inlet and exhaust systems.
Old 06-27-2004, 12:40 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
SoCal4Running's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Oceanside, CA.
Posts: 1,421
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I didnt get a Flowmaster at all, its too "poser" out here in sothern california. I had a Dynomax Superturbo installed, its far quieter than a Flowmaster and doesnt draw attention from the wrong people.

As for the cat we didnt change it because the one in the truck is newer and was 2 1/4 to match the rest of the system.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Steven.m.paulk
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
4
06-07-2020 10:45 AM
the_supernerd
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
13
10-01-2015 09:20 PM
voiddweller
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
16
09-28-2015 11:21 PM
Keithstoyota
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
3
09-27-2015 07:29 AM



Quick Reply: More on Exhaust



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:40 AM.