Maintenance & Repair Archives Note: This section will be merged in with the other tech areas soon, and is now closed

exhaust

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 05:38 PM
  #1  
Lukeman82's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Question exhaust

alright then, here is what i invision for my exhaust on my truck when i can find a decent welding shop. header coming off the engine dumping into a side by side dual pipe all the way back into dual flowmasters, then dumping out behind the back wheel. does this seem retarded or am i on to something here.
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 05:48 PM
  #2  
rimpainter.com's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,916
Likes: 1
Sounds like not enough back pressure to me. Stick with a single, 2" max.
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 07:37 PM
  #3  
Lukeman82's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by <96 Runner>
Sounds like not enough back pressure to me. Stick with a single, 2" max.
even if the pipes are 1 1/4" though? i just want something that sounds different
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 04:45 AM
  #4  
rimpainter.com's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,916
Likes: 1
Well, I am no engineer, but that still sounds like not enough back pressure for that engine. If you have to have duals, you may want to consider a single in dual out flowmaster (with very small outlet diameters). Or, a single all the way into dual out at the tip. You can do whatever you want, but I am just trying to save you the hassle of driving around at 5K RPM all day to get anywhere.
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 09:16 AM
  #5  
kevin444's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,813
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by <96 Runner>
Well, I am no engineer, but that still sounds like not enough back pressure for that engine. If you have to have duals, you may want to consider a single in dual out flowmaster (with very small outlet diameters). Or, a single all the way into dual out at the tip. You can do whatever you want, but I am just trying to save you the hassle of driving around at 5K RPM all day to get anywhere.


I second that.
Old Dec 19, 2004 | 07:08 AM
  #6  
CynicX's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,370
Likes: 0
......after the header you can get the most power w/o exhaust, the least amount of restriction after a tuned header will give you the best performance.....

reason i say this is because my wrx produced more power with the catback off the car (less backpressure) then with it installed (more backpressure)....it was only about 5hp and was on the same dyno day.....

of course it had alot of 3" pipe before that.....so i'm not exactly sure what the trick is...

Last edited by CynicX; Dec 19, 2004 at 07:41 AM.
Old Dec 19, 2004 | 06:44 PM
  #7  
TACOMANATOR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
From: Littleton, CO
You will have no torque if you run a freeflow sytem like that on a 22r. As far as turbo charged vehicles--the less restriction the better. For N/A vehicles you need some back pressure. I can't understand why I see all these ricers with fart cans on their civics. They have no torque in their vehicles to begin with, then they have to put a fart can on it.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Steven.m.paulk
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
4
Jun 7, 2020 10:45 AM
the_supernerd
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
13
Oct 1, 2015 09:20 PM
voiddweller
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
16
Sep 28, 2015 11:21 PM
Keithstoyota
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
3
Sep 27, 2015 07:29 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:13 PM.