95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

To any of you thinking about an oversized aftermarket intake on a 3.4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 08:11 AM
  #1  
ElwayLite's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: Mobile, Alabama
To any of you thinking about an oversized aftermarket intake on a 3.4

Consider against it. I had one on my taco for a few mo's and detonation became a problem that only 89 octane fixed. I thought I had cured the problem a few days ago when I got a CE light about the truck running lean and a Bank#1 misfire.

Since it was overdue(im sure the previous owner didnt do the plugs at 30k) i did my 60k mile service early and changed my plugs to some new ngk's and some new wires. Well it appeared that solved the detonation but it didnt. I also noticed when playing with the throttle cable underhood when first given gas the motor would choke then rev up instead of being smooth. This made me wonder because the few times I got on it since the intake install it seemed to bog then haul arse which I chalked up as normal because I had only had the truck a week before the intake went on.

As an experiment and after reading alot on detonation and what created a lean condition, I reinstalled the stock 2001 intake and modified the front of the airbox kinda like a deckplate mod. Detonation is gone completely on 87 octane, and the same action with the throttle produces power instantly across the rpm range with no hesitation.

Now after driving it a few days with the stock intake on it feels like I put an aftermarket intake on it. Must have been since I changed it so early i didnt actually notice a performance loss but now with the stock back on it runs better.

Just figured this would be an interesting post for anyone considering an aftermarket intake, granted my results might not be the same as everyone else's but it never hurts to post the facts.

Does anyone think that maybe the taco intake is perfect for the motor unlike so many other stock intakes and I actually was introducing too much air to the motor with the large 3" intake?
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 08:14 AM
  #2  
96LtdYota's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,551
Likes: 0
From: Tuscaloosa, Al... ROLL TIDE!!!
that is why i love my deckplate
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 08:43 AM
  #3  
WolfpackTLC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 825
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Interesting theory, but I'd doubt it... If I'm right, the 3.4's are OBD II compliant. That said, whatever gains in airflow you received (which had to be minimal, maybe 2-5% or so) would have been offset by the programming the in EFI ECU.... in theory. But then again, maybe the 3.4 isn't as adaptive as I and/or Toyota had hoped. But still, I ran a 2nd gen S/C and an open air intake and then a snorkle on my old 3rd gen w/o issues of detonation or pinging.... but then again, I always ran 93 octane or higher.. hmmm.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 10:53 AM
  #4  
rimpainter.com's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,916
Likes: 1
So Elway, what you are saying is that the deckplate (similar) mod works? C'mon man, we could of told you that a long time ago!

The 3.4 is definitely not starved for air. But, just the right amount seems to help.

I am a little confused by your post. Did you go back to stock completely, or did you actually cut the front of the airbox out?
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 10:59 AM
  #5  
ElwayLite's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: Mobile, Alabama
Yeah, I shoulda tried the cheaper alternative first. When I put the oem intake back in i decided to go ahead and dremel out the front as I had done with vehicles in the past and hooked it all back up proper.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 11:02 AM
  #6  
rimpainter.com's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,916
Likes: 1
Time to change your avatar!
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 11:50 AM
  #7  
ElwayLite's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: Mobile, Alabama
yepp, have to get an updated pick of my truck this afternoon.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 01:17 PM
  #8  
Turbodude's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
I believe the problem lies more with how the air moves over the mass airflow sensor than the total airflow going in the motor. I have a friend who works at a dealership and they've had trouble with some aftermarket air filter assmeblies when the were close to the maf.

.02
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 03:15 PM
  #9  
QIKRUNR's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Texarkana TX
When you say bigger intake, are you talking about the air inlet tube? I have never seen an aftermarket intake for a 3.4. Probably a dumb question, just want to clarify.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 03:37 PM
  #10  
ElwayLite's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: Mobile, Alabama
Yeah, a larger tube and the large cone filter, you can see it in my sig. The pipe was 3".
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 03:47 PM
  #11  
gwhayduke's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 1
From: El Paso, TX
Originally Posted by ElwayLite
Yeah, a larger tube and the large cone filter, you can see it in my sig. The pipe was 3".
I'm thinking that the volume of the tube was too large and the flow velocity was diminished, which led to your bad performance. I don't have the pre-detonation figured out though.

Any other ideas?
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 05:02 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Did you reset your ecu when you put on the new filter? Supposedly the ecu needs to re-learn the A/F map when you do a mod like this. I did so when I did my deckplate mod...
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 06:58 PM
  #13  
ElwayLite's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: Mobile, Alabama
Oh yeah, any time i do anything on the vehicle that is even near something electrical the neg battery cable is disonnected.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 06:59 PM
  #14  
ElwayLite's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: Mobile, Alabama
Originally Posted by gwhayduke
I'm thinking that the volume of the tube was too large and the flow velocity was diminished, which led to your bad performance. I don't have the pre-detonation figured out though.

Any other ideas?
I'm not quite sure either, but with the stock intake, new plugs/wires, and a pcv valve to boot, the 3.4 is purring like a kitten. Now I cant wait to do my used oil analysis.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Road Bull
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
23
Oct 10, 2015 04:55 PM
gary4runner
Newbie Tech Section
3
Sep 24, 2015 12:53 AM
94whiterunner
Items Wanted
0
Jul 12, 2015 07:15 PM
Suprarossa
99+ Tundra, 00+ Sequoia, 98+ Land Cruiser/LX470
0
Jul 6, 2015 05:21 AM
Vargntucson
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
0
Jul 4, 2015 12:15 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:27 PM.