Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

over sized valves and cam upgrade

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 03:56 PM
  #1  
Chuck Manners's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: punxy PA
over sized valves and cam upgrade

i bought a head for my 90 pickup cause it was a steal of a deal i couldnt pass it up. it has over sized valves im thinking of putting a cam in it im not sure what to get. im looking for power between 2000 and 4000 rpms. i just need some help finding a good cam. please help me!!
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 06:45 PM
  #2  
iamsuperbleeder's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,248
Likes: 33
From: Lake City, Fl
check into engnbldr's 261

that's what I'm running, and she pulls steady from about 1500 to about 4500



Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 07:07 PM
  #3  
marsbike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Mundelein, IL
I agree. the 261 is a great cam!
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2010 | 11:50 PM
  #4  
sas'd22re's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC
I had over sized valves, a header and a flomaster 40 series muffler with 2 1/4" pipe the whole way and no cat and the 267 cam and did not like it. Not enough off the line and I had to be at too high of an rpm when going up hills....the powerband with only 125ish ponies was too high in my opinion. 261 all the way
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2010 | 12:52 AM
  #5  
Erik Beeman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 433
Likes: 1
From: Concord, CA
I have the 261C and i redline my truck all day. i love it. never seems to drop off. power doesn't seem to come into play until mid range tho. ok with me, but maybe not you.

Last edited by Erik Beeman; Mar 5, 2010 at 12:53 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2010 | 05:46 AM
  #6  
Dipstik_90's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
I have the 261c now and the power falls off a cliff at 4500rpm. I now have on a stand a 30 over 22re with EB's rv head and the new 270 cam. I like to let my truck rev and the 261 just doesn't do that, it's a crawler cam.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2010 | 08:14 AM
  #7  
dfarr67's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 232
Likes: 2
From: Edson, AB, Canada
I've got CC 258, decent. Watch what you feed you computer.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2010 | 11:50 AM
  #8  
RustBucket's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,804
Likes: 25
From: Atlanta
268 is great if you want it to open up a bit more around 3k. That's what I cruise at so I sprung for it.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2010 | 10:28 AM
  #9  
PismoJoe's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 84
From: Pismo Beach, California
Hey are you guys with the 268 or 261 cam running them with ported exhaust with oversized valves and heavy springs, or just with a completely stock head?
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2010 | 01:53 PM
  #10  
olharleyman's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,607
Likes: 2
From: maryland
Originally Posted by PismoJoe
Hey are you guys with the 268 or 261 cam running them with ported exhaust with oversized valves and heavy springs, or just with a completely stock head?
268 here Mine is set up that way and I love it it's great for both bottom and top end
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2010 | 02:02 PM
  #11  
olharleyman's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,607
Likes: 2
From: maryland
Yes I do no higher it's a waist of money but I have run 91 not much difference if any that I have noticed
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2010 | 06:02 PM
  #12  
Larryb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
I have EB's performance head with oversize valves and 268 cam. Runs great and i still have the stock exhaust all the way to the tail pipe that will be upgraded to a 2" in the near future so i hopefully i will see some more gains. I have to run 89 octane in mine as it slightly pings with 87. No noticeable pinging with the 89 and was very, very slight on 87 but bugged me none the less.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2010 | 09:08 PM
  #13  
Robert m's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 143
From: Apple Valley, CA
Originally Posted by Larryb
I have EB's performance head with oversize valves and 268 cam. Runs great and i still have the stock exhaust all the way to the tail pipe that will be upgraded to a 2" in the near future so i hopefully i will see some more gains. I have to run 89 octane in mine as it slightly pings with 87. No noticeable pinging with the 89 and was very, very slight on 87 but bugged me none the less.
how much timing are you running?
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2010 | 04:22 AM
  #14  
Larryb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
I run factory specs, 5 deg with the connector jumped. I have tried running less than 5 deg but wasnt happy with the performance so i stick with 5deg and 89 fuel. I live in Ca so it may be something to do with our fuel, who knows
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 11:00 PM
  #15  
PismoJoe's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 84
From: Pismo Beach, California
guys, olharly, lary, thanks for the info! has anyone ever tried EB's 270/430? The info I got from Ted was that its the MOST performance overall with a stock setup, just wondering if anyone has had a chance to play around with the torque ranges it offers
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2010 | 06:30 AM
  #16  
dfarr67's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 232
Likes: 2
From: Edson, AB, Canada
I set mine up for 9 deg advanced with 89 octane- just for kicks I gave it a full tank of 87 octane, there may be a few factors like winter fuel and cold temp- but no ping and the power seems similar.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2010 | 06:33 AM
  #17  
AzStorm's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
From: HELL,AKA Phoenix,Arizona
Im running a 280 440/440 in mine with no complaints.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2010 | 09:26 PM
  #18  
olharleyman's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,607
Likes: 2
From: maryland
Originally Posted by PismoJoe
guys, olharly, lary, thanks for the info! has anyone ever tried EB's 270/430? The info I got from Ted was that its the MOST performance overall with a stock setup, just wondering if anyone has had a chance to play around with the torque ranges it offers
Ya mine is going to be very different since I run 35's and 5.29's and 20 over so I believe Ted really knows his way around most any 22 set up if you give him the full run down of what you have done to it and what you intend to do to it he can get you very close to stock performance and mileage

Originally Posted by Robert m
how much timing are you running?
I have mine at 8 degree's advance but not to go past 10 degrees by TED
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bigjstang
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
21
Jun 2, 2025 03:56 PM
GreatLakesGuy
The Classifieds GraveYard
8
Sep 4, 2015 09:27 AM
rondogracing
Engine Swaps
16
Aug 24, 2015 03:02 AM
justdifferentials
Just Differentials
1
Aug 15, 2015 05:25 PM
Gravel Maker
RuffStuff
1
Jul 27, 2015 06:53 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:14 AM.