84-85 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd gen pickups and 1st gen 4Runners with solid front axles

Shaky steering 85 PU

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 06:21 PM
  #1  
votum's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Shaky steering 85 PU

I got my 85 SR5 pickup today and on the ride home (200miles) I noticed the steering was shaky, I did have a 600 pound motorcycle in the back and it was pretty windy, but it seemed to be alot more movement than my steering, the truck is on a 5" lift and 35s, the front end isnt geared, only the back, I was thinking maybe the tires werent balanced, they were purchased at some place called "budget tire" (they are BFGs) It happened more at the 80mph range than in the 60s, anyone have a clue, is it bad or just been too long since i drove a toy?
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 06:39 PM
  #2  
4Crawler's Avatar
Contributing Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,821
Likes: 34
From: SF Bay Area, CA
Could be any number of things.

The weight in the back will make the rear end ride lower and each inch it is lower than the front adds about 1 degree of caster angle to the steering, so you may have gone out of the stable steering range. Try driving a similar speed with the bed empty.

Could be a tire flat spotted from sitting a long time, but that is uncommon with radials and usually the tire will round out again once it warms up.

Could be a tire has gone out of balance (weight fell off for example) or had a belt break. You might try putting the front tires in the air and spin each tire and watch for any runout in the tread pattern as it rolls by. Look for any side-side wobble in the tread or any up-down motion in the surface or sidewalls of the tire.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 07:09 PM
  #3  
'884Runner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
From: GA
Does it still have a steering stabilizer? Alot of the solid axle trucks I've ridden in and drove kind of have the tendency to "chase rabbits". Could this be what you are referring to?
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 07:31 PM
  #4  
88wildrunner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
From: Meadow Vista, CA
check your steering joints for wear
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2008 | 07:33 PM
  #5  
ephwang's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
Could be a bent rim. When I first got my truck, the steering wheel would vibrate a lot at 50 mph. Took it to the tire shop to have the wheels rebalanced and the shop found one of the front rims bent. Rotated the bent rim to the rear and the steering wheel vibrations stopped.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 05:51 AM
  #6  
votum's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by '884Runner
Does it still have a steering stabilizer? Alot of the solid axle trucks I've ridden in and drove kind of have the tendency to "chase rabbits". Could this be what you are referring to?
Thats exactly it, I am not very mechanically inclined with the truck yet, only been 1 day, but while I was driving that would be the best way to explain it, chasing rabbits, it would just swerve on its own seemingly. How do I check for a stabilizer?
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 06:07 AM
  #7  
dropzone's Avatar
Fossilized
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 19,771
Likes: 456
From: PNW
23 year old truck. Worn tie rods end, sloppy steering box, wheel bearings, etc.
A steering stablizer is going to look like a shock mounted to your axle housing and tie rod.
My truck with 33's is sometimes affected by ruts in older road surfaces...
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 07:56 AM
  #8  
4Crawler's Avatar
Contributing Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,821
Likes: 34
From: SF Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by votum
Thats exactly it, I am not very mechanically inclined with the truck yet, only been 1 day, but while I was driving that would be the best way to explain it, chasing rabbits, it would just swerve on its own seemingly. How do I check for a stabilizer?
Look for something like a small shock absorber attached to the tie rod on the front axle. The one below is after market, the stock one is smaller in diameter and usually black.




http://www.4crawler.com/4x4/CheapTri...ringStabilizer
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 08:00 AM
  #9  
votum's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Yea I have one, it does look old as hell though, same with my shocks =x where can I find cheap stuff for my truck ?
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 08:08 AM
  #10  
deserttoy84's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
From: san diego
whatever you do... dont use 4 wheel drive if only the rear is re geared. I replaced the stabilizer on my truck with an oem type replacement from NAPA auto parts and it made a big difference. just get the tires balanced and look over your steering system. Are you running stock steering with that 5 inch lift? You need at least a drop drag link for that much lift. if its all suspension lift.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 08:30 AM
  #11  
rdlsz24's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 6
From: Northern IL
On a side note you probably weren't really going 80mph. The speedometer will read quite a bit more than you are really going with the 35's. Unless you already factored that in when you said 80mph.

Rob
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 11:04 AM
  #12  
88wildrunner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
From: Meadow Vista, CA
if you really were goin 80, and it dosent shake in the 60 and 70 ranges i wouldnt worry to much about it because 80mph in an 85 pickup with 35" mud tires with a 600 pound bike in the back is pushing it, my truck vibrates right when it hits 80 but up till 80 its smooth. also try goin 80 with out the bike and see if theres a difference
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 11:10 AM
  #13  
scuba's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 11,338
Likes: 120
From: Austin, Texas
well if it was me after my experience, i wouldnt buy a "new" truck and hop on the freeway and go 80,
that just askin for trouble
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 01:49 PM
  #14  
votum's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Not sure if the steering is stock, I forgot about the ofset for the speedo, what is it for 35s usually?
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 02:22 PM
  #15  
4Crawler's Avatar
Contributing Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,821
Likes: 34
From: SF Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by votum
Not sure if the steering is stock, I forgot about the ofset for the speedo, what is it for 35s usually?
See:
- http://www.4crawler.com/4x4/4LoCalc....peedoConverter
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 04:19 PM
  #16  
votum's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 4Crawler

You sure your calculations are right there? It says when my spedo reads 80 im going 96, and I know I wasnt going 96 up hills with my bike in the back, and while people passed me =x
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 04:25 PM
  #17  
4Crawler's Avatar
Contributing Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,821
Likes: 34
From: SF Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by votum
You sure your calculations are right there? It says when my spedo reads 80 im going 96, and I know I wasnt going 96 up hills with my bike in the back, and while people passed me =x
Pretty simple: NewTireSize/OriginalTireSize * SpeedometerReading = ActualSpeed.

This is assuming you have not regeared the axles or recalibrated the speedometer for the tire size change. Also assumes that the speedo was accurate before the tire size change.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2008 | 06:44 AM
  #18  
rdlsz24's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 6
From: Northern IL
Originally Posted by votum
You sure your calculations are right there? It says when my spedo reads 80 im going 96, and I know I wasnt going 96 up hills with my bike in the back, and while people passed me =x
That sounds like it's backwards. With larger tires than stock size your speedo is going to be reading faster than you are actually traveling.

Rob
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2008 | 07:03 AM
  #19  
'884Runner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
From: GA
No, it's correct. Giv e it a little thought. For each turn of the hub, you are now covering more distance because the circumference of the tire is greater.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2008 | 07:41 AM
  #20  
4Crawler's Avatar
Contributing Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,821
Likes: 34
From: SF Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by rdlsz24
That sounds like it's backwards. With larger tires than stock size your speedo is going to be reading faster than you are actually traveling.

Rob
In the Toyota, the speedometer actually reads the rotations of the rear driveshaft (or actually the transfer case output shaft). So for every rotation of that, a taller tire will roll farther. Thus for a given speedometer reading (i.e. rear driveshaft speed) a taller tire will roll farther in a given time. Moving farther in a given time = faster.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:34 AM.