Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

Low Profile Bumpstops on a stock 4runner

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 27, 2007 | 07:10 PM
  #1  
strykersd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 569
Likes: 1
Low Profile Bumpstops on a stock 4runner

Are there any advantages to low profile compression (lower) bumpstops on stock 4runners? I have a first gen 4runner that is completely stock other then 31" tires and no front sway bar. I am considering buying low profile bumpstops. Before I purchaused them I went outside to test my suspension. I jacked the 4runner up by the lower A-arm and it never hit the lower bumpstop. There was still a good 3/4" gap between the lower bumpstop and the A-arm. I keep hearing people talk about how they allow IFS more articulation, but how could that be if it can't even hit the stock bumpstops? Thanks

Patrick
86 4runner
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2007 | 07:24 PM
  #2  
tc's Avatar
tc
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,875
Likes: 3
From: Longmont, CO
With the tbars, you have a hard time "flexing it out" with just a jack. It flexes more in real life. For the price, I think it's a great mod to get more flex!
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2007 | 07:51 PM
  #3  
Godzilla's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,171
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver
Originally Posted by tc
With the tbars, you have a hard time "flexing it out" with just a jack. It flexes more in real life. For the price, I think it's a great mod to get more flex!
i agree here, I put on ES ones on my 92 runner. It is cheap and easy with benefits. And yes you do flex out more in real time driving. look up above the bumpstop, and youll probably see a glossy looking round spot on the metal from all the contact
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2007 | 06:56 PM
  #4  
MUDN4R's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Newport News, Va
where can you can these bumpstops?
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2007 | 07:26 PM
  #5  
ewong's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 3
From: Philly PA
IMHO just slapping on low profile bump stops when the bars arent cranked (or stiffer bars installed) doenst net much - but also its an inexpensive mod.

A Jounce Shock would do alot - but is not an easy or straightforward mod.

I have 300M torsions and run STOCK lower bump stops - I want the bigger bumper to soak up the hits - tho with those T bars I no longer have a sear spot
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2007 | 08:01 PM
  #6  
strykersd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 569
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by ewong
IMHO just slapping on low profile bump stops when the bars arent cranked (or stiffer bars installed) doenst net much - but also its an inexpensive mod.
I thought cranking T-bars and stiffer t-bars can limit compression?


Wow funny that someone brought this thread back today, I was just about to order a set of bumpstops from summit racing today. I was looking at universal energy suspension bumpstops. I needed smaller then stock diameter bumpstops since I had to grind one of the bump stops mounts to clear my Skyjacker hydro shocks. I don't know about other 4runners, but for my first generation 4runner with BJ spacers when the suspension is at full droop my shock hit the mount. Luckily I installed the shocks while the motor was out so the truck was at full droop otherwise I would of never known and would be damaging my shocks.

How tall of a bumpstop do you first gen 4runner guys use?

Last edited by strykersd; Aug 27, 2007 at 08:11 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2007 | 08:13 AM
  #7  
deathrunner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,969
Likes: 1
From: San Diego CA
stockers all around for me. I think I might have to replace teh droop bumps soon. I will probably go with a poly stop of the same size.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2007 | 08:35 AM
  #8  
ewong's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 3
From: Philly PA
deleted "misinformation"

Last edited by ewong; Aug 28, 2007 at 11:56 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2007 | 10:27 AM
  #9  
tc's Avatar
tc
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,875
Likes: 3
From: Longmont, CO
Originally Posted by ewong
The "limiter" on travel are
-- stock bump stops
-- metal tab that the bump stop is mounted to
BREAKAGE
not sure if the CVs (inner or outer) or BJs or contro arm mounts will go first

Low profile bump stops on the UPPPER side are used becuase when lift is cranked in - the upper A arm can "ride" on the upper snubber - making a rattle etc...

Low profile bump stops on the LOWER side allow a bit more compression "travel" before the bump stop "engages".
But the over all travel remains the same.
Wow. So much misinformation, where to start?

First, the WHOLE POINT of bumpstops is to limit the travel. Whether they are stock or low pro, that's what they're there for. You limit the travel to prevent breakage/binding.

You can EASILY get more compression travel. Look at how the CV sits - angled down. You have to bend it straight before you even remotely approach an angle where you will damage it.

You need to be careful on the droop, though, because the CV is already bent that way ... kinda like a head start. Even then, there is still SOME droop travel available before damaging the CV - look at all the guys running BJ spacers to get extra droop.

Cranking the t-bars will increase the load required to get the same amount of compression. Obviously, if this exceeds the weight of the truck, you're just gonna lift the truck up, not compress the suspension.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RedRunner_87
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
84
Jun 1, 2021 01:51 PM
MMA_Alex
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
25
Apr 18, 2017 05:07 AM
lledwod
Items Wanted
1
Aug 30, 2016 01:03 PM
MTLroadierunner
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
0
Jul 6, 2015 12:17 PM
HRDC0R19
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
3
Jul 5, 2015 06:43 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:51 AM.