95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

testing a fuel sending unit....conflicting info???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 21, 2012 | 06:16 PM
  #1  
full_throttle's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 4
Likes: 1
From: West Frankfort, Illinois
testing a fuel sending unit....conflicting info???

greetings,

I have been troubleshooting a gas gauge problem on my 1999 4-runner, and in my research I have come across what appears to me to be conflicting information.
Several people have cited this website for troubleshooting the fuel gauge system. One of the links at this site has the following information for a 1999 4runner;


"INSPECT FUEL SENDER GAUGE
Measure the voltage between terminals 2 and 3 for each float position.
If resistance value is not as specified, replace the sender gauge
."


Even though it says to measure the voltage, I am sure it means resistance. So, according to this page, the resistance should be between 4.6 ohms and 0.3 ohms depending on the amount in the tank.

NOW, compare that to to what I have found on 1996 to 2002 Toyota 4Runner OEM Repair and Wiring Manuals specifically HERE

The important stuff is on pages BE-51 and BE-52

Note how to test the resistance of the sending unit, and how to check the gauge.

INSPECT FUEL SENDER GAUGE
Measure the resistance between terminals 1 and 3 in each float
position.
Float position: mm (in.) Resistance (Ω)
F: Approx. 39.4 (1.551) Approx. 184Ω
1/2: Approx. 56.0 (2.205) Approx. 97Ω
E: Approx. 148.9 (5.862) Approx. 12Ω

The differences are the pins to measure and the measurements themselves.

Can anyone confirm which way is correct?? When I measure using pins 1 and 3, my resistance measurements are in line with the chart, but when I use pins 2 and 3, they are way off....

I am not sure what to think here. I tend to believe the 2nd one since it appears to be from the FSM, but the first one looks legit as well??

Can anyone with a known working system take the time to take these measurements and confirm which set of instructions are correct?
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2012 | 06:21 PM
  #2  
BajaRunner's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,122
Likes: 6
From: 5th Gen San Diegan, California
FYI The fuel gauge reading on these trucks are pretty bad. I've owned 3 and none work very well.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2012 | 10:50 AM
  #3  
toyospearo's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,277
Likes: 23
From: way way nor cal
I second what BajaRunner is saying.
Out of 4 pre 95 yotas I have owned/own none of them were dead on. Mostly they were pretty far off.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2012 | 07:17 PM
  #4  
full_throttle's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 4
Likes: 1
From: West Frankfort, Illinois
I understand and agree that the gauge has issues. What I cannot seem to find out is which of these two methods for testing a sending unit is correct?
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2012 | 02:29 AM
  #5  
suncomb1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 684
Likes: 1
From: Downingtown, PA
Go to your local Toyota dealer and ask them which is correct, most Toyota dealer service managers are always willing to help. I use a factory service manual for servicing my truck (1983) and the information in them has always been correct.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2012 | 03:39 AM
  #6  
xxxtreme22r's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 13,574
Likes: 72
From: Wilkes-Barre, PA, USA
I'd be willing to bet the FSM is correct and not the other website.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2026 | 10:22 PM
  #7  
Stucco17's Avatar
Registered User
Liked
 
Joined: Apr 2026
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Testing New Fuel Gauge part # 8332035590

I just recently had a fuel gauge problem and managed to fix it (It was a melted terminal on the back of cluster board) link here: https://www.yotatech.com/forums/f2/3...l#post52504493

During the course of troubleshooting, I did the test both ways (Haynes manual says terminal 2 and 3, FSM says 1 and 3..FSM is right apparently)
2 & 3 got me a reading of 203-205 constantly regardless of float arm position
1 & 3 got me reading of approx 180 in top, 100 in half, 12 in bottom (its the exact opposite of what it says it should be but it measured very accurately)

Try cleaning all the metal on the fuel sending unit and resolder, it might help (Idk if it helped me but I did)
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sleaker
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
17
Aug 26, 2020 06:03 AM
the1998sr5
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
15
Jul 14, 2020 08:35 PM
Doug4320
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
19
Mar 24, 2018 10:11 PM
Fundy Rider
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
4
Jul 16, 2015 01:35 AM
Tyler Cunningham
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
3
Jul 11, 2015 10:18 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:48 AM.