The Fab Shop Tube buggies, armor protection and anything else that requires cutting, welding, or custom fab work

Sick, sick, sick!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 19, 2003 | 10:21 AM
  #1  
scott.475's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: Washington State
Sick, sick, sick!

How many t-cases do you see?

1,150:1!

Last edited by scott.475; Dec 19, 2003 at 01:30 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2003 | 10:55 AM
  #2  
Mikronized's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
oh my god... that's hardcore..
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2003 | 11:13 AM
  #3  
scott.475's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: Washington State
It'd take about an hour just to get from your driveway to your street!
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2003 | 11:35 AM
  #4  
crawler#976's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 938
Likes: 0
From: Chino Valley, Az.
ok,

let's assume 5.29 r/p

first gear on a W56 tranny is 3.95

and 3 stock t'cases @ 2.28 each

for a crawl ratio of 247 to 1, 109 to 1 and 47 to 1 crawl ratios- thats COOL!

__________

BUT,

add a 4.7 gear set in one t'case and it's 510 to 1

add two 4.7 gear sets = 1052 to 1

and the Triple 4.7 Crawler is: 2169 to 1

___________

But wait, we're not done yet!

how about triple 5 to 1 gear sets, and going to a R151F tranny at 4.31 for first gear?

that gets us to 2850 to 1

tooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo slowwwwwwwwwwwww
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2003 | 12:31 PM
  #5  
amusement's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 0
From: Portland, Oregon


The customer shifters are going to extreme pain to fabricate.

Was the intended for a 4runner or a on-going joke
supporting the local 4x4 shop?

And to accoring to Crawler#976 excellent calculations
@ that gets us to 2850 to 1. It would be insane to place
so much torgue on the universals or drive lines.

Maybe it's time to break out the Insanity Clause.
:xmas13:
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2003 | 01:12 PM
  #6  
44Runner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 993
Likes: 0
From: Mount Pleasant, SC
Originally posted by crawler#976
ok,

let's assume 5.29 r/p

first gear on a W56 tranny is 3.95

and 3 stock t'cases @ 2.28 each

for a crawl ratio of 247 to 1, 109 to 1 and 47 to 1 crawl ratios- thats COOL!

__________

BUT,

add a 4.7 gear set in one t'case and it's 510 to 1

add two 4.7 gear sets = 1052 to 1

and the Triple 4.7 Crawler is: 2169 to 1

___________

But wait, we're not done yet!

how about triple 5 to 1 gear sets, and going to a R151F tranny at 4.31 for first gear?

that gets us to 2850 to 1

tooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo slowwwwwwwwwwwww
Thought I might jump in and give more exact numbers.
Keep assuming 5.29s in the diffs.
given that the picture appears to be a R150F with two R1FA reduction housings and then a V1FA t-case.

stock ratios would give you:
3.83 x 2.28 x 2.28 x 2.56 x 5.29 = 270:1

with dual 4.7s:
3.83 x 4.7 x 4.7 x 2.56 x 5.29 = 1146:1

I assume you added an extra 1 in your ratio scott. I believe my second calculation is what you actually have there in the picture. To answer your question, I only see one...

Last edited by 44Runner; Dec 19, 2003 at 01:16 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2003 | 01:28 PM
  #7  
GRNTACO's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 0
From: On a trail in WA.
If I put that in my taco I would have to mount the third stick in my bed
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2003 | 01:28 PM
  #8  
scott.475's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: Washington State
Here is the page, go to the very bottom. 3.83x4.7x4.7x2.57x5.29 for the final ratio of 1150:1

And since we can never get enough, check out the videos here. The last one with Marlin's red truck shows it moving, if you can call it that, at 1047:1. Cool. It could only be better if Marlin himself was anrrating, "Fifth geeeaaarrr, fourth geeeaaarrr, third geeeaaarrr, second geeeaaarrr, first geeeaaarrr, yeah!"

Originally posted by 44Runner I assume you added an extra 1 in your ratio scott
Nah, 1,1150 is a number you only learn about in really advanced math placement classes! :pat:

Last edited by scott.475; Dec 19, 2003 at 01:36 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2003 | 02:29 PM
  #9  
44Runner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 993
Likes: 0
From: Mount Pleasant, SC
Originally posted by scott.475

Nah, 1,1150 is a number you only learn about in really advanced math placement classes! :pat:
HAHAHA, I knew I should have taken more math while I was here. I had no idea!
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2003 | 04:50 PM
  #10  
crash's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
From: GOLDBAR BABY!!!
Heck, I only have 2 t-cases and I am 316:1
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2003 | 04:46 PM
  #11  
lcopelan22's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: Conyers, GA
Originally posted by scott.475
Here is the page, go to the very bottom. 3.83x4.7x4.7x2.57x5.29 for the final ratio of 1150:1

And since we can never get enough, check out the videos here. The last one with Marlin's red truck shows it moving, if you can call it that, at 1047:1. Cool. It could only be better if Marlin himself was anrrating, "Fifth geeeaaarrr, fourth geeeaaarrr, third geeeaaarrr, second geeeaaarrr, first geeeaaarrr, yeah!"


Nah, 1,1150 is a number you only learn about in really advanced math placement classes! :pat:
I don't know what "placement" math you tested into but where i come from it's 11,150.
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2003 | 02:41 AM
  #12  
ravencr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,697
Likes: 0
From: Deep Gap, NC
That's pretty awesome! It looks as if all you need is traction, and you're good to go. I'd say slightly lower gears would be nice for over here in the east, but something that low would be useless due to traction issues with mud and slick rocks here in the east. Very impressive!

Chris
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2003 | 01:33 PM
  #13  
85runner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
What's it going in...pics?
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2003 | 03:09 PM
  #14  
44Runner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 993
Likes: 0
From: Mount Pleasant, SC
Originally posted by 85runner
What's it going in...pics?
I doubt it is going/has gone into anything. It is just for show...
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2003 | 10:02 PM
  #15  
85runner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
In that case, Lets show it installed in my truck over some rocks!!!
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2003 | 02:02 AM
  #16  
ravencr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,697
Likes: 0
From: Deep Gap, NC
Traction would be the key, that's for sure!

Chris
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2004 | 07:18 PM
  #17  
toy283's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 2
From: Denver, CO, US
I'm perfectly happy with my 151:1 (with the ability to go to 724:1 if wanted) and more than a foot less length. And I've essentially got three cases if you count the granny low as a 1.98:1 case multipied by a 3.55 first gear (7.05:1 overall ratio).

Last edited by toy283; Jan 3, 2004 at 12:31 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 09:15 PM
  #18  
upndair's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
From: Milton, WA
I'm dropping down a little. I actually found the 2.8 - 4.7 - 5.29 a little low. My dana 60s have 4.10 gears. I'm not about to change them. I think I'll llike the slightly higher gearing on the trails, but on the road... I'll be glad I have 2wd low.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
icentropy
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
22
Sep 16, 2020 02:47 PM
highonpottery
Buying & Selling Advice - Feeler/Gauging Interest
7
Jul 18, 2015 02:48 PM
PureTacoma_Tundra
PureTacoma_Tundra
0
Jul 2, 2015 12:35 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:59 PM.