Long Travel 1st Gen.
#22
I am running Old Man Emu torsion bars. They seem to do better then the Rancho torsion bars on my other truck. Dont know exactly what you guys are talking about on the other post, but if I offended somebody with my web site, I apologize.
Kind of wish I would have done the coil over front end instead. Looks awesome!!!!!!!!!! Most likely rides alot better then mine too.
JMach1
Kind of wish I would have done the coil over front end instead. Looks awesome!!!!!!!!!! Most likely rides alot better then mine too.
JMach1
#24
Sounds like jmach1 has his bars cranked, but somehow he's getting killer flex too, which usually doesn't go together. Might have to check out those OME t-bars.
I have the sway aways and I try to keep lift to a minimum. I usually sit at about 2-2.5" of lift i believe.
Jmach- no worries, I wasn't offended, just wasn't sure of the jackson reference.
Pinnacle- Glad to hear the tripple pack was soft that is my biggest concern, I want my buddy to have a soft ride and decent flex. Not that you had much chance to flex them at pismo. My trucks coming along, I don't want to hijcak your thread about it, I'll post on my old thread when i get it back. So if 1-1.5" is enough for us (Which it is) would you recommend this pack vs. a downey complete spring pack?
I have the sway aways and I try to keep lift to a minimum. I usually sit at about 2-2.5" of lift i believe.
Jmach- no worries, I wasn't offended, just wasn't sure of the jackson reference.
Pinnacle- Glad to hear the tripple pack was soft that is my biggest concern, I want my buddy to have a soft ride and decent flex. Not that you had much chance to flex them at pismo. My trucks coming along, I don't want to hijcak your thread about it, I'll post on my old thread when i get it back. So if 1-1.5" is enough for us (Which it is) would you recommend this pack vs. a downey complete spring pack?
#25
Originally Posted by 92' 4Runner SR5
How much lift did you guys get up front? What size tires are you guys running?
Originally Posted by deathrunner
Pinnacle- Glad to hear the tripple pack was soft that is my biggest concern, I want my buddy to have a soft ride and decent flex. Not that you had much chance to flex them at pismo. My trucks coming along, I don't want to hijcak your thread about it, I'll post on my old thread when i get it back. So if 1-1.5" is enough for us (Which it is) would you recommend this pack vs. a downey complete spring pack?
#26
Ya know, I will have to measure front and rear and give the actual height and get back to you. I have 4" alcan springs on the back with extended greasable shackles. The truck sits very level from front to back. But it did get good articulation while we were in Moab.
#33
Originally Posted by deathrunner
jmach- what diameter are your OME torsion bars? where did you get them, and how much?
No one can find any info on them. Thanks
No one can find any info on them. Thanks
www.offroadsolutions.com.
http://photos21.flickr.com/32822830_afe667f081.jpg
This pic is not the best, but I guarantee that when you held the stock one in one hand and the OME one in the other there was definetly a difference between the 2. The alignment shop looked at the whole set up kind of weird but the truck alligned fine. The mechanic said that I was probably at my limit on height for the torsion bar. But it rides smooth and absorbs all the bumps well at high speed as well as when wheeling. I am vey happy with it.
JMach
#34
I always kinda equivalated more torsion crank with more flex. I have the same thickness torsion as you, but I can only touch the compression bumpstops if flying through whoops or flexing with the nose pointing downhill. I think our shocks might be the difference.
I have 2.5" diameter shocks your's appear to be 2" or less. Perhaps mine are too aggressively filled with nitrogen or valved too stiff. I have already dropped the nitrogen from 200psi to 150psi. It helped a bit too. I do about 60% flexy stuff and 40% quick stuff so I will probably want to valve my shocks in favor of softness.
It looks like the coolf flex shot from Moab might have been pointing downhill, which would make sense.
I have 2.5" diameter shocks your's appear to be 2" or less. Perhaps mine are too aggressively filled with nitrogen or valved too stiff. I have already dropped the nitrogen from 200psi to 150psi. It helped a bit too. I do about 60% flexy stuff and 40% quick stuff so I will probably want to valve my shocks in favor of softness.
It looks like the coolf flex shot from Moab might have been pointing downhill, which would make sense.
#36
Originally Posted by deathrunner
I always kinda equivalated more torsion crank with more flex. I have the same thickness torsion as you, but I can only touch the compression bumpstops if flying through whoops or flexing with the nose pointing downhill. I think our shocks might be the difference.
I have 2.5" diameter shocks your's appear to be 2" or less. Perhaps mine are too aggressively filled with nitrogen or valved too stiff. I have already dropped the nitrogen from 200psi to 150psi. It helped a bit too. I do about 60% flexy stuff and 40% quick stuff so I will probably want to valve my shocks in favor of softness.
It looks like the coolf flex shot from Moab might have been pointing downhill, which would make sense.
I have 2.5" diameter shocks your's appear to be 2" or less. Perhaps mine are too aggressively filled with nitrogen or valved too stiff. I have already dropped the nitrogen from 200psi to 150psi. It helped a bit too. I do about 60% flexy stuff and 40% quick stuff so I will probably want to valve my shocks in favor of softness.
It looks like the coolf flex shot from Moab might have been pointing downhill, which would make sense.
#38
Not to be a jerk, but before you answered me about the torsion thickness, I had sent an email to OME (I am impatient), here is what I got back in response to the diameter question:
23.4mm diameter, compared to stock 22.6mm diameter
So your bars are actually 23.4mm according to OME, that would explain why your front end flexes so well, plus your weight distrobution because of the rock.
I'd consider getting lighter bars, but I do like doing some high speed stuff and I'd hate to have it too soft. How does your perform under quick conditions?
23.4mm diameter, compared to stock 22.6mm diameter
So your bars are actually 23.4mm according to OME, that would explain why your front end flexes so well, plus your weight distrobution because of the rock.
I'd consider getting lighter bars, but I do like doing some high speed stuff and I'd hate to have it too soft. How does your perform under quick conditions?
#39
Originally Posted by deathrunner
Not to be a jerk, but before you answered me about the torsion thickness, I had sent an email to OME (I am impatient), here is what I got back in response to the diameter question:
23.4mm diameter, compared to stock 22.6mm diameter
So your bars are actually 23.4mm according to OME, that would explain why your front end flexes so well, plus your weight distrobution because of the rock.
I'd consider getting lighter bars, but I do like doing some high speed stuff and I'd hate to have it too soft. How does your perform under quick conditions?
23.4mm diameter, compared to stock 22.6mm diameter
So your bars are actually 23.4mm according to OME, that would explain why your front end flexes so well, plus your weight distrobution because of the rock.
I'd consider getting lighter bars, but I do like doing some high speed stuff and I'd hate to have it too soft. How does your perform under quick conditions?
My truck is fun to drive over dips in the road or just flying up my drive way gutter, you feel nothing in the front end due to it absorbing so well. Here in Colorado, our sort of wheeling is "slow speed" due to the amount of rocks on the trails. the front end does very well on this and actually smoothed out the ride compared to my 90 toy without the Chaos. Not at all like Moab. The rear end is a different story. Rides real rough back there.
#40
I looked up the 25mm OME torsion bars on the internet and found that these are
used on the Land Cruiser. That would make sense since Land Cruisers are so big and heavy. If I put those on my truck there probably would be no suspension, ride like a brick probably.
used on the Land Cruiser. That would make sense since Land Cruisers are so big and heavy. If I put those on my truck there probably would be no suspension, ride like a brick probably.


