Offroad Tech Discussion pertaining to additions or questions which improve off-road ability, recovery and safety, such as suspension, body lifts, lockers etc
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Coil-sprung Tacoma?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 06:50 AM
  #1  
copperhead_69's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Okinawa, Japan and Georgia
Question Coil-sprung Tacoma?

I'm in the very, very early planning stages for a SAS on my Taco. I have already decided on using (H)eep coils and a three-link on the front axle. Next comes my rear axle. When looking at a new "unlimited" (H)eep, I noticed it has a 103 in. wheelbase, the same as my Taco.(ok, so it's off by .3 of an inch, close enough!) I would prefer to use production pieces because of simplicity and lack of money. I'll be using D44's and 37 inch BFG's with my 2.7/manual and twin-stick t-case.

What are peoples thoughts about using (H)eep "unlimited" front and rear suspension lift components?
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 10:03 AM
  #2  
deathrunner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,969
Likes: 1
From: San Diego CA
kinda a cool idea. LIke to see how it turns out.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 10:44 AM
  #3  
BajaRunner's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,122
Likes: 6
From: 5th Gen San Diegan, California
I was reading something about this on TTORA. Some of the guys there tried this, but, I cant remember if it was a bad idea or good idea. Try searching there in the SAS tech forum for TJ coils.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 02:26 PM
  #4  
gumbo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
From: arlington,tx
I am planning something similar in the front. I have a full width D44 and will be using radius arms (probably from James Duff) with coilovers and a panhard.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 05:35 PM
  #5  
Avsfreak1234's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Estes Park Co
sounds good! tell us the details when your done. Im thinking about something similar but dont know it its worth the time and money.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 06:00 PM
  #6  
Flygtenstein's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,216
Likes: 1
From: Fort Collins, CO
Why?

Budget and axle swap do not play well together.

Making a separte coil and shock set up in front really is a waste of time. Going with coilovers is cleaner and easier.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 07:28 PM
  #7  
superjoe83's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,864
Likes: 1
From: Oregon City, Oregon
or air shocks, cheaper to buy and tune compared to coilovers

Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 07:35 PM
  #8  
AxleIke's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 6
From: Arvada, Colorado
go with leafs if you have a lack of money, they work very well, and are easier to do, and cheaper...
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2005 | 07:25 AM
  #9  
Flygtenstein's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,216
Likes: 1
From: Fort Collins, CO
Air shocks?

Another utter waste of time for a truck that sees street too.

There is one way to do a super flexy linked front that is streetable and wheelable. It comes from Fox, Sway-Away, Bilstein, etc.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2005 | 04:05 PM
  #10  
superjoe83's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,864
Likes: 1
From: Oregon City, Oregon
Originally Posted by Flygtenstein
Air shocks?

Another utter waste of time for a truck that sees street too.

There is one way to do a super flexy linked front that is streetable and wheelable. It comes from Fox, Sway-Away, Bilstein, etc.
why are you against the Fox nitrogen charged shocks?
in my opinion, they are equal to coilovers, but much cheaper, about 220 a shock, Ive ridden in 2 trucks/buggies that had these, they rode fine on the road
i not trying to question your knowledge, but I'm curious to why your so set on coilovers?
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2005 | 07:02 PM
  #11  
Flygtenstein's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,216
Likes: 1
From: Fort Collins, CO
They are not the same.

A coilover is more adjustable, tunable, etc. To say they are comparable is not correct.

To say one could use them is.

I had the chance, got an education and did not pick air shocks.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2005 | 07:37 PM
  #12  
slyang1012's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
From: Diamond Bar, CA
This will be intresting....Air shocks VS coilovers VS leafs?
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2005 | 07:58 PM
  #13  
AxleIke's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 6
From: Arvada, Colorado
leafs do not fall into the same category as coilovers...the only thing they have in common is that they are springs, and they can hold an axle under a truck...coilovers perform much better than leafs, but they have to be done correctly, and that's more difficult than it looks...leafs are cheap, and pretty bomb proof...copperhead69 said that "I would prefer to use production pieces because of simplicity and lack of money" and i suggested leafs since coilovers do not fit with "lack of money"...
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2005 | 05:25 PM
  #14  
copperhead_69's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Okinawa, Japan and Georgia
First off, thanks for everyone's input, but like I said this is in the very early planning stages now. All I have is a bunch of chicken scratch and numbers. Also, I am in the Army and I will be on the ground in Iraq before this year is over. I won't even be able to drive my Taco until 2007.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LCE_Performance
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
0
Oct 1, 2015 01:03 PM
bryan34w
Buying & Selling Advice - Feeler/Gauging Interest
12
Sep 30, 2015 02:50 PM
irv
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
7
Sep 29, 2015 01:04 PM
charlie_fong
General Vehicle Related Topics (Non Year Related)
0
Sep 27, 2015 10:06 PM
Project90
Solid Axle Swaps, All Years
0
Sep 24, 2015 11:40 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:55 AM.