BFG MT in 255/85 and sand
Apr 17, 2006 | 08:34 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
BFG MT in 255/85 and sand
I have 285/75-16 BFG AT's and am looking at buying a new set of tires. While I would love to buy a set of BFG MT's or GY MT/R's, the reality is that is probably way more tire than I need. My 4Runner is my daily driver, and my commute is about 15 miles each way. My only off-roading includes driving on the beaches in Corolla, NC. I have been thinking about the BFG MT's in 255/85. This would give me similar if not greater ground clearance and aspect height. My '96 is flareless, so I think some people's concerns of a 255 looking too narrow might not apply as much. I could see how that tire would look narrow under Limited flares.
1. Is anyone running the BFG 255/85 (other than Expeditions West)? Comments? Pictures?
2. How are these tires, in any size, in the sand? Am I looking for trouble taking them out on the beach? I rescued four SUVs last summer with my AT's. I don't want to be on the other end of the tow rope this June.
Thanks in advance.
Brian
1. Is anyone running the BFG 255/85 (other than Expeditions West)? Comments? Pictures?
2. How are these tires, in any size, in the sand? Am I looking for trouble taking them out on the beach? I rescued four SUVs last summer with my AT's. I don't want to be on the other end of the tow rope this June.
Thanks in advance.
Brian
Apr 17, 2006 | 09:59 AM
#4
Banned
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 4Peanut
I like the look of the MT's. My question is, will it get me through the sand, or will I be exposed for the poser that I am?
The MT's should be fine on sand...lots of people do them. I think the most imporant thing is leaving a big footprint
Apr 17, 2006 | 11:29 AM
#7
Contributing Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
From: Simi Valley, Ca
Mine tend to dig more than anything in the sand. I never got stuck, but there was a couple hills I had problems getting up. I'm getting 2 285/75/16 BFG AT's for the rear to be used for sand.
Trending Topics
Apr 17, 2006 | 11:41 AM
#8
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by Localmotion
why are you thinking 255/85?
Apr 17, 2006 | 12:01 PM
#9
Registered User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,291
Likes: 0
From: 100 miles offshore as much as possible, & Springfield Oregon USA
You will need to air way down, the narrower tire combined with MT tread will dig like crazy. But you should still be fine. <head scratching why anyone would live with a less useful tread for their typical driving/wheeling style, faster treadwear, reduced handling, and increased noise 'for the look'.>
<oh wait, most of us do that....>
<oh wait, most of us do that....>
Last edited by Flamedx4; Apr 17, 2006 at 12:09 PM.
Apr 17, 2006 | 12:13 PM
#10
Banned
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Flamedx4
You will need to air way down, the narrower tire combined with MT tread will dig like crazy. But you should still be fine. <head scratching why anyone would live with a less useful tread for their typical driving/wheeling style, faster treadwear, reduced handling, and increased noise 'for the look'.>
<oh wait, most of us do that....>
<oh wait, most of us do that....>
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ashamsuddin
General Vehicle Related Topics (Non Year Related)
17
Jul 22, 2024 03:59 AM
kawazx636
The Classifieds GraveYard
34
Oct 6, 2021 03:03 PM
nvwiggins
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
13
Jun 16, 2016 03:05 PM
FS[GreatLakes]: 33x12.5x15 bfg ko a\t
muddpigg
Axles - Suspensions - Tires - Wheels
8
Nov 2, 2015 05:36 AM
