BFG MT in 255/85 and sand
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BFG MT in 255/85 and sand
I have 285/75-16 BFG AT's and am looking at buying a new set of tires. While I would love to buy a set of BFG MT's or GY MT/R's, the reality is that is probably way more tire than I need. My 4Runner is my daily driver, and my commute is about 15 miles each way. My only off-roading includes driving on the beaches in Corolla, NC. I have been thinking about the BFG MT's in 255/85. This would give me similar if not greater ground clearance and aspect height. My '96 is flareless, so I think some people's concerns of a 255 looking too narrow might not apply as much. I could see how that tire would look narrow under Limited flares.
1. Is anyone running the BFG 255/85 (other than Expeditions West)? Comments? Pictures?
2. How are these tires, in any size, in the sand? Am I looking for trouble taking them out on the beach? I rescued four SUVs last summer with my AT's. I don't want to be on the other end of the tow rope this June.
Thanks in advance.
Brian
1. Is anyone running the BFG 255/85 (other than Expeditions West)? Comments? Pictures?
2. How are these tires, in any size, in the sand? Am I looking for trouble taking them out on the beach? I rescued four SUVs last summer with my AT's. I don't want to be on the other end of the tow rope this June.
Thanks in advance.
Brian
#4
Originally Posted by 4Peanut
I like the look of the MT's. My question is, will it get me through the sand, or will I be exposed for the poser that I am?
The MT's should be fine on sand...lots of people do them. I think the most imporant thing is leaving a big footprint
#7
Contributing Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Simi Valley, Ca
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mine tend to dig more than anything in the sand. I never got stuck, but there was a couple hills I had problems getting up. I'm getting 2 285/75/16 BFG AT's for the rear to be used for sand.
Trending Topics
#8
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Localmotion
why are you thinking 255/85?
#9
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: 100 miles offshore as much as possible, & Springfield Oregon USA
Posts: 3,291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You will need to air way down, the narrower tire combined with MT tread will dig like crazy. But you should still be fine. <head scratching why anyone would live with a less useful tread for their typical driving/wheeling style, faster treadwear, reduced handling, and increased noise 'for the look'.>
<oh wait, most of us do that....>
<oh wait, most of us do that....>
Last edited by Flamedx4; 04-17-2006 at 12:09 PM.
#10
Originally Posted by Flamedx4
You will need to air way down, the narrower tire combined with MT tread will dig like crazy. But you should still be fine. <head scratching why anyone would live with a less useful tread for their typical driving/wheeling style, faster treadwear, reduced handling, and increased noise 'for the look'.>
<oh wait, most of us do that....>
<oh wait, most of us do that....>
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ashamsuddin
General Vehicle Related Topics (Non Year Related)
17
01-13-2023 03:17 AM
kawazx636
The Classifieds GraveYard
34
10-06-2021 03:03 PM
nvwiggins
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
13
06-16-2016 03:05 PM
FS[GreatLakes]: 33x12.5x15 bfg ko a\t
muddpigg
Axles - Suspensions - Tires - Wheels
8
11-02-2015 05:36 AM