Offroad Tech Discussion pertaining to additions or questions which improve off-road ability, recovery and safety, such as suspension, body lifts, lockers etc
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

4.56's for 35's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 16, 2005 | 11:19 PM
  #1  
Keggo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 1
From: Bakersfield, CA
Question 4.56's for 35's?

I was just looking at a chart about good gearing ratios for different size tires... now... it said 4.56's were best overall performance for 35's. This kind of confuses me... on that chart it leaned toward "better fuel economy" with this combo. I was thinking about going with 35's and was wondering what you guys thought would be a good gearing ratio to switch in.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2005 | 11:40 PM
  #2  
93YODER's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: ft.collins colorado
4.56S are more the enough for a vehicle with a big motor, but in a toyota with 35 inch tires,5.29s would work best.
Remember that if you take a engine out of its power range it will cost you gas milage too...

225/70R-15 Tires = 4.10 or 4.30 gears
31 x 10.5-15 Tires = 4.56 or 4.88 gears
32 x 11.5-15 Tires = 4.56 or 4.88 gears
33 x 9.5-15 Tires = 4.88 or 5.29 gears
33 x 12.5-15 Tires = 4.88 or 5.29 gears
35 x 12.5-15 Tires = 5.29 gears

Last edited by 93YODER; Apr 16, 2005 at 11:44 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2005 | 02:38 AM
  #3  
leebee's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: marlbank, canada
i noticed keggo has the 5 spd, i thought the 4.88's were the preferred gears for 35's. usually 5.29's are for the autos when you go 33 and up. ive changed over computers and i cant find all my info for regearing yet, i am going from memory and its not what is used to be!

lee
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2005 | 02:57 AM
  #4  
jon_7248's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
From: Grapevine TX
Originally Posted by 93YODER
4.56S are more the enough for a vehicle with a big motor, but in a toyota with 35 inch tires,5.29s would work best.
Remember that if you take a engine out of its power range it will cost you gas milage too...

225/70R-15 Tires = 4.10 or 4.30 gears
31 x 10.5-15 Tires = 4.56 or 4.88 gears
32 x 11.5-15 Tires = 4.56 or 4.88 gears
33 x 9.5-15 Tires = 4.88 or 5.29 gears
33 x 12.5-15 Tires = 4.88 or 5.29 gears
35 x 12.5-15 Tires = 5.29 gears

Hmm, Not sure for auto trans, but 5spds can run 33s with 4.56s nicely (for daily, offroad, and highway) so 4.88s would do nicely for 35s. If you went to 529s, you would have high RPMS all the way down the highway. Personally I plan on running 255/85r16 (a true 33) with 4:10s and know they will do fine. I also ran 33x1250s on 410s with the old 22re and only had problems with hills. But that engine wasnt a v6 so it's had problems with hills with 29s and 4.10s
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2005 | 10:44 AM
  #5  
Keggo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 1
From: Bakersfield, CA
Thanks for the help. Originally I was thinking 5.29's since it's a big tire and I thought it would even out the rpm prob. I had just heard since it was a bigger ratio that they were easier to break... I think I heard that The more I think about 35's the more I want 'em! would a 3" susp. lift and a 2" body lift be sufficient for tires that size?
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2005 | 12:39 PM
  #6  
AxleIke's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,464
Likes: 6
From: Arvada, Colorado
This equation works if you are stock and want to regear back to stock power w/bigger tires.

(New Tire diameter/Old tire diameter)*stock gear ratio
I'm pretty sure the diameters have to be in inches.

To find your ratio, look up the code on the plate under your hood.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2005 | 03:24 PM
  #7  
BruceTS's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,315
Likes: 0
If I had to do it all over again, I'd go with 4.56 gears. With the 3.4L it has more than enough power to pull 35's with 4.88's, but it does hurt fuel ecomony. I see you have the 3.0L, in your case the 4.88's would probably serve you the best.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2005 | 07:45 PM
  #8  
jon_7248's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
From: Grapevine TX
Originally Posted by Keggo
The more I think about 35's the more I want 'em! would a 3" susp. lift and a 2" body lift be sufficient for tires that size?
Hmm, on a 91' you may be able to get away with it if you didnt go offroad. The tire height isnt the problem, it's the width. Thats why I plan on getting a play set of tires that are 34x1050r16 with only 2" lift on my tacoma.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2005 | 06:48 AM
  #9  
Keggo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 1
From: Bakersfield, CA
Originally Posted by BruceTS
If I had to do it all over again, I'd go with 4.56 gears. With the 3.4L it has more than enough power to pull 35's with 4.88's, but it does hurt fuel ecomony. I see you have the 3.0L, in your case the 4.88's would probably serve you the best.
Cool cool. I'd probably have to get a shop to change em out for me, huh? I'm sure it'd be cheaper if I just unbolted everything myself and took them the third members... am I right in thinking this?
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2005 | 06:59 AM
  #10  
Keggo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 1
From: Bakersfield, CA
Originally Posted by jon_7248
Hmm, on a 91' you may be able to get away with it if you didnt go offroad. The tire height isnt the problem, it's the width. Thats why I plan on getting a play set of tires that are 34x1050r16 with only 2" lift on my tacoma.
Yeah.. but I do go offroading. I'll probably end up getting 15x10's with something like 3.5" backspacing... for the tires I'll go the route of 35x12.5
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2005 | 08:12 AM
  #11  
Biff's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by Keggo
Cool cool. I'd probably have to get a shop to change em out for me, huh? I'm sure it'd be cheaper if I just unbolted everything myself and took them the third members... am I right in thinking this?

I'm removing the 3rd members and taking them into a shop to install 4.56s, and dual ARBs. Total savings $1200, more than enough for a nice winch.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2005 | 09:12 AM
  #12  
Keggo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 1
From: Bakersfield, CA
Awesome... I'll have to take them off myself then! thanks for the info! Maybe I can take them to the same shop you are since L.A. is so close to Bakersfield.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2005 | 09:25 AM
  #13  
jimbo74's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,590
Likes: 0
From: Nor*Cal
5.29s with 35s would be most ideal.

it would give an effective ratio of 3.63 if you factored having stock 31s with stock 4.10 gearing originally

in the same instance, if you put 5.29 gears into the vehicle with 31s your effective ratio would be 5.97 as compared to the 35s.....

this is a little bit confusing so let me explain... lets say you have 31s and have 4.10s.... well if you use those same 4.10s with 35s, you will have an effective ratio of 3.63

in the same instance, if you put 5.29 gears into the vehicle with 31s your effective ratio would be 5.97 as compared to the 35s.....
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2005 | 09:40 AM
  #14  
Biff's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
I'm taking my 3rd members into 4bydoctor in Burbank.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2005 | 08:54 PM
  #15  
Keggo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 1
From: Bakersfield, CA
Originally Posted by Biff
I'm taking my 3rd members into 4bydoctor in Burbank.
When you go, tell him you referred someone to him. Maybe if and when I go he'll give you a discount on some future work.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2005 | 08:12 AM
  #16  
Biff's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by Keggo
When you go, tell him you referred someone to him. Maybe if and when I go he'll give you a discount on some future work.

Will do. Whats your name?
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2005 | 09:12 PM
  #17  
Keggo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,820
Likes: 1
From: Bakersfield, CA
My name is Kevin Galloway. We should meet up sometime and go wheelin'.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2005 | 09:28 PM
  #18  
anthony1's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 1
From: torrance, CA.
YOu can get away with 2" BL and 3" suspension lift but don't plan on going offroad.

You'll have to crank the t-bar pretty high...unless you use Downey 3" IFS lift kit or Rancho...

I did it just to drive around after I put elocker and 5.29 in the rear while waiting to do SAS. Even with that much t-bar cranked, it still rubs on some bumps in turns.

As far as gear, 5.29 with 35's is better than 4.88. it's a little lower than stock but 4.88 is still too tall for our 3.0 engine. It seems like it'll be best if it's some where in the 5.10 range.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2005 | 04:51 AM
  #19  
934rnr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 1
From: mayport FL
I have 5.29's and a 35's but I have a 4 cylinder in my 82. I think 4.88's would have been better for the street however.
If I do goto a 5mge or 6mge supra motor later down the road I am probably going to drop 4.56's into it.

If I had a newer 90-95 runner again I would just score some 4.88's from a automatic out of the junkyard.

my 2cents

Last edited by 934rnr; Apr 25, 2005 at 04:52 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dirtrider0129
Buying & Selling Advice - Feeler/Gauging Interest
10
Jun 24, 2015 12:24 PM
turdo
The Classifieds GraveYard
1
Mar 31, 2006 11:08 PM
byron4
Offroad Tech
12
Oct 14, 2005 04:34 PM
4Runner92sr5
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
3
Jun 5, 2005 10:20 AM
86runner
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
29
May 27, 2005 06:49 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:33 AM.