Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

using air conditioning= less power and mpg

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-20-2005, 08:00 AM
  #21  
Registered User
 
Rick F.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Far western Kentucky (transplanted from central PA)
Posts: 1,066
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's foolish to say there's no loss of HP with the AC on. ANY additional load on the engine equates to less power available at the wheels. Heck, even your alternator and power steering unit use some (however minor) of your engine's output.

There are some vehicle's (I don't believe Toyota's fall in this category) that, once the AC has been turned on, will NOT disengage the clutch on the AC compressor if you turn the AC switch off until the engine is shut off (for whatever reason). For those vehicles, I could understand not noticing any change when you turn the AC on and off. But there undoubtably IS a difference in wheel horsepower when the compressor is cycled on and off. Those that think I'm wrong should try their next attempt sober.
Old 05-20-2005, 08:39 AM
  #22  
Registered User
 
MudMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Gering, NE
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When I had my 87 Chevy Sprint, I would lose 10 Miles per HOUR when I turned on the A/C. But that was with a 1 liter 3 cylinder.
Old 05-20-2005, 09:15 AM
  #23  
Contributing Member
 
CynicX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My father used to be a trooper before he retired they Maryland State Police did testing on Crown Vic's and found they would get better MPG on average by keep the A/C on and windows up.

They did the test to help save gas money. Although someone driving around town all day will have opposite results they said on average, you get better MPG with your AC on.

This was also in a crown vic. I havent tested my truck, but I usually prefer the windows down....
Old 05-20-2005, 09:44 AM
  #24  
Registered User
 
Flamedx4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: 100 miles offshore as much as possible, & Springfield Oregon USA
Posts: 3,291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 93ToyKid
I notice no difference at all with it on or off on my 3.0.

I sure do. Big difference. Hardly notice it on my 5.4 F150 though.

You can't get something for nothing. The electricity to run the fan and the compressor clutch increases load on the alternator which the engine has to turn. That is a small drag, but the mechanical power needed to turn the compressor and pressurize the refrigerant is substantial - it all totals anywhere from 5 to 20 horsepower. Typically for a modern car-sized system it's 5 to 10 hp. The horsepower needed for this represents a substantial proportion of the excess power available, this power comes off the top - your reserves. On a big V8 this is hardly noticeable, on a smaller engine it can make a huge difference, especially when you consider that the engine is rarely making anywhere near it's peak power. So of course there is a performance loss, everyone who has driven a car in the summer and played with the ac has felt the difference. As for fuel consumption, there is no valid scientific rationale that allows you to use 10 extra hp and not have to burn fuel to get it. If that was so, why would it take so much extra electicity to run the air conditioning in your house? Energy that does work is energy consumed, whether it's electricity or gasoline or diesel... On our big motorhomes it takes 20 horsepower to run the a/c and 30 horsepower to run the hydraulic radiator fans!
Old 05-20-2005, 10:01 AM
  #25  
Contributing Member
 
Robinhood150's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wandering around Phoenix
Posts: 6,033
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Turning on your dome light affects your mileage, it's just so small you can't tell.
Old 05-20-2005, 10:09 AM
  #26  
Registered User
 
Flamedx4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: 100 miles offshore as much as possible, & Springfield Oregon USA
Posts: 3,291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep. Think about those guys with ten 100 watt lights on the roll bar and 6 more on the front bumper, cranking 5000 watts of stereo....
Old 05-20-2005, 10:36 AM
  #27  
Registered User
 
Rick F.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Far western Kentucky (transplanted from central PA)
Posts: 1,066
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just for fun (or for REAL, actually), 5000 watts is equivalent to 6.7 horsepower. And don't forget the efficiency of the alternator which means it takes a bit more power in to get those 5000 watts out.
Old 07-02-2005, 04:39 PM
  #28  
Registered User
 
axon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fort Belvoir, VA
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ganoid
On the freeway the AC is fine but in town during slow stop and go traffic your fan clutch will lock up to cool the AC condensor. The fan is what sucks the power out of your engine not so much the AC its self. The toyota fan clutch isnt a speedy device either it will slowly lock up and it will pretty much stay locked until you get up to freeway speeds for a while and the clutch cools off letting the fan unlock.
Good point

So do you guys think the "electric fan mod" would be a cure for this problem?

Last edited by axon; 07-02-2005 at 04:40 PM.
Old 07-02-2005, 05:36 PM
  #29  
Registered User
 
4slomo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi, I'm new, I've been reading posts for quite some time, but haven't had anything worthwhile to comment on until now. Here are the monthly average mpg data for the Audi A6 (2.7l, 200 HP, 5 sp auto, fwd) I had a 4 year lease on until just recently:

Month/Yr MPG
May-01 22.14
Jun-01 21.78
Jul-01 22.17
Aug-01 20.13
Sep-01 19.49
Oct-01 21.01
Nov-01 22.34
Dec-01 20.50
Jan-02 21.52
Feb-02 22.87
Mar-02 20.98
Apr-02 21.99
May-02 21.83
Jun-02 21.47
Jul-02 21.84
Aug-02 21.42
Sep-02 20.86
Oct-02 21.17
Nov-02 22.00
Dec-02 21.88
Jan-03 21.52
Feb-03 23.96
Mar-03 21.45
Apr-03 23.57
May-03 21.52
Jun-03 18.98
Jul-03 N/A
Aug-03 17.34
Sep-03 18.83
Oct-03 20.86
Nov-03 21.65
Dec-03 21.73
Jan-04 21.96
Feb-04 22.28
Mar-04 22.82
Apr-04 22.01
May-04 21.72
Jun-04 21.42
Jul-04 20.61
Aug-04 21.29
Sep-04 21.31
Oct-04 22.36
Nov-04 21.76
Dec-04 21.36
Jan-05 23.48
Feb-05 22.00
Mar-05 22.38
Apr-05 21.91

In the Phoenix area, you pretty much need to have AC on from May/June through Sept/Oct, and then you can leave it off and use economy (natural ventilation) the rest of the year. I usually kept my windows shut and used the car's ventilation system to minimize wind buffeting, so this provides a pretty good comparison of AC versus no AC. The data shows that there's not much variation in mpg using versus not using AC.

Sorry for the long post, I've seen others insert excel tables, but I wasn't able to figure how to do it for this one.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BeMiceElf
Misc Stuff (Vehicle Related)
7
10-10-2015 09:40 PM
tj884Rdlx
Newbie Tech Section
25
08-28-2015 12:04 PM
88sasturbotoy
Axles - Suspensions - Tires - Wheels
2
08-11-2015 01:56 AM
ryerye13
84-85 Trucks & 4Runners
3
07-14-2015 08:27 AM
skoti89
Offroad Tech
3
07-08-2015 12:05 AM



Quick Reply: using air conditioning= less power and mpg



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:49 AM.