95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

Two steps cooler plugs= worse mileage?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 2, 2007 | 01:45 PM
  #1  
Donovan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: Merced, CA
Two steps cooler plugs= worse mileage?

I finally installed my irridium plugs in the truck and went with a cooler plug to reduce ping with the supercharger. The ping seems to have been cured but I seem to now be getting worse mileage. I also cleaned off my MAF when the intake was apart. Is this normal with the cooler plugs?
I haven't noticed any change in power.
Thanks
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2007 | 02:09 PM
  #2  
Greedy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 495
Likes: 2
From: Woodinville, WA
Are they IK 20 or IK 22's? If you have just the S/C you probably only need the 20's - one step cooler. If they are too cool of a plug they may be fouling and leading to worse mileage..
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2007 | 03:21 PM
  #3  
Donovan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: Merced, CA
Originally Posted by Greedy
Are they IK 20 or IK 22's? If you have just the S/C you probably only need the 20's - one step cooler. If they are too cool of a plug they may be fouling and leading to worse mileage..
I have to go home and look at the box as I can't remember. I used the ones on Sparkplugs.com as a reference for stock and went from there.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2007 | 07:48 PM
  #4  
fullmann's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: Back in Colorado....
I installed the colder plugs that came with the trd 7th kit & 160 degree thermostat, I havent wired up the actual 7th injector yet, but my truck got around 20.7 mpg the first tank right after the supercharger went on, and now the ecu seems to be getting used to the charger and I'm sitting at 310 miles on 3/4 of a tank. Im thinking that should put me right at about 23mpg.

I'll hafta see what happens when I get the actual 7th wired up. I expect my mileage to take a little hit, but not that bad........hopefully.

I assume you reset the ecu after you did the plug swap?
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2007 | 08:46 PM
  #5  
jimbob's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
21 mpg ?!?!?!?! Good lord --- I'd kill to get that kind of mileage!
I bought my runner with the SC already on it and I would get a consistent 17 mpg ---- after I put the (TRD) 7th on, I can't even break 16 - usually running 14-15mpg. I attribute some of it to the REVOs, but...

What am I missing here?

It runs good - no pinging. I don't do alot of WOT runs for fear of blowing the tranny (IPT is in the future) --- I've learned to be kind to the tranny. I know its running rich --- but THAT rich? Makes me think that there is no problem running a 2.2" pulley -- but would that run richer?

Contemplating talking with Jason to see what the 7th controller might do for me --- but I'm alittle leary of heading down the tuning road - that was the whole reason for going with the TRD 7th (I was able to run it for a year under warranty). I'm even contemplating replacing the O2 in case its in a slow death spiral.

All the threads about SCs --- seems like everyone is having their own set of issues.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2007 | 08:57 PM
  #6  
QSVeilside's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by jimbob
21 mpg ?!?!?!?! Good lord --- I'd kill to get that kind of mileage!
I bought my runner with the SC already on it and I would get a consistent 17 mpg ---- after I put the (TRD) 7th on, I can't even break 16 - usually running 14-15mpg. I attribute some of it to the REVOs, but...

What am I missing here?

It runs good - no pinging. I don't do alot of WOT runs for fear of blowing the tranny (IPT is in the future) --- I've learned to be kind to the tranny. I know its running rich --- but THAT rich? Makes me think that there is no problem running a 2.2" pulley -- but would that run richer?

Contemplating talking with Jason to see what the 7th controller might do for me --- but I'm alittle leary of heading down the tuning road - that was the whole reason for going with the TRD 7th (I was able to run it for a year under warranty). I'm even contemplating replacing the O2 in case its in a slow death spiral.

All the threads about SCs --- seems like everyone is having their own set of issues.
You should have no problems running the 2.2" pulley with the 7th injector. I did it before going with the 2.1" and walbro fuel pump. No knock codes, no lean codes, no audible ping, plugs look good.

You're running a LOT of weight. You might consider removing anything you don't need - bull bars, running boards, etc, and going with stock sized LIGHT weight tires 265/70/16... oh yes, there can be a discrepancy of 12 to 15 lbs per tire depending on your choice. BFG AT's - great tires, but at 50 lbs per tire these kill performance and MPG.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2007 | 09:01 PM
  #7  
jimbob's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by QSVeilside
....going with stock sized LIGHT weight tires 265/70/16... oh yes, there can be a discrepancy of 12 to 15 lbs per tire depending on your choice. BFG AT's - great tires, but at 50 lbs per tire these kill performance and MPG.
But... its a 4RUNNER ... you HAVE to have big knarly tires
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 07:56 AM
  #8  
Donovan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: Merced, CA
Originally Posted by jimbob
But... its a 4RUNNER ... you HAVE to have big knarly tires
Yeah really, I have 285 Nittos on the truck and I get about 290 miles on about 16.5 gallons of gas. However the mileage is off slightly since the tires are larger then stock. I expect to get worse mileage with the bigger tires, but it seems to have gone down since putting in the new plugs?
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 08:11 AM
  #9  
Greedy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 495
Likes: 2
From: Woodinville, WA
I got about 220 miles on 14 gallons of gas with my stock rims and tires on. With my old set-up I was at about 190 (88 lbs total weight per tire/rim!). So it does make a big difference. With my new volk's and 32's I should be right around stock numbers if not a little better.

Have you pulled the plugs to see what they look like?
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 01:14 PM
  #10  
metalhed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 470
Likes: 1
From: Sacramento California
I also put the 2 step cooler plugs in and had a drop in MPG, used to get 19-20 with Bosch 4 prong plugs in, went to the irridum plug and only get 17-18 now. I also moved much closer to work, 2 miles versus 11 miles.

Sefoamed, cleaned MAF, etc.. nothing brought the MPG back. going to replace the O2 sensor and see if that helps some. might try 1 step vs 2

but at $8-10 each= ouch to the wallet

2 step helped with the ping, Bosch plugs rattled like rocks in a soup can.

01 Tacoma, S/C
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2007 | 01:58 PM
  #11  
Donovan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: Merced, CA
Originally Posted by metalhed
I also put the 2 step cooler plugs in and had a drop in MPG, used to get 19-20 with Bosch 4 prong plugs in, went to the irridum plug and only get 17-18 now. I also moved much closer to work, 2 miles versus 11 miles.

Sefoamed, cleaned MAF, etc.. nothing brought the MPG back. going to replace the O2 sensor and see if that helps some. might try 1 step vs 2

but at $8-10 each= ouch to the wallet

2 step helped with the ping, Bosch plugs rattled like rocks in a soup can.

01 Tacoma, S/C
Could be that the shorter trip is actually costing you mileage if you don't get on to the freeway. (still saves in overall gas consumption over a given time). I'm getting about the same mileage as you.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Eggslinger
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
22
Jun 8, 2019 03:32 PM
RaginAsian91
Engine Swaps
4
Mar 30, 2019 09:17 AM
montanatruck
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
15
Feb 26, 2017 07:07 AM
greenbuggy
3.4 Swaps
4
Jul 23, 2015 11:51 AM
Snort
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
1
Jul 9, 2015 03:58 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:18 AM.