95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

Tacoma's 190hp vs. 4runner's 183hp 5VZFE?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 11:36 AM
  #1  
22R-to-5VZFE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Fort Collins, Co
Tacoma's 190hp vs. 4runner's 183hp 5VZFE?

Quite simply I can't find any info on why the 4runner v6 makes 7 less hp and like 3 lbs less tq. than the same year Tacoma? Itake/exhaust differences? Intakes look the same to me. Stricter emissions or somthing?

Just wondering why my dads 95 tacoma lists more power than my 96 SR5 4runner? Same 5 speed manual tansmission. Thanks for any info.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 11:44 AM
  #2  
drguitarum2005's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,226
Likes: 0
From: Houston (home), Atlanta (school), Cincinnati (work)
tacoma weighs less due to less metal covering the bed?
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 11:46 AM
  #3  
4Runner202020's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
From: Fort Collins
i donno if that would effect the hp though. they dont base it off of weight, just engine output... maybe though.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 11:48 AM
  #4  
drguitarum2005's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,226
Likes: 0
From: Houston (home), Atlanta (school), Cincinnati (work)
thats true, that wouldnt affect it if its measured on a bare engine at the crank, it would affect it at the wheels. hmm.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 12:07 PM
  #5  
X-AWDriver's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
From: Littleton,CO
That minimal HP diff is most likely exhaust differences.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 12:28 PM
  #6  
Hugo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: Charlesbourg (Qc)
Exhaust routing is straighter in the Tacoma = mo powah.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 01:27 PM
  #7  
89macrunner's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,057
Likes: 1
From: Tempe, AZ
Weight has NOTHING to do with horsepower and torque. Yes it has an effect on acceleration.

Im pretty sure these engines are dyno'd on a stand with just the exhaust manifolds on them. The differences in specs are probably from different SAE testing specifications for different years. The new tacoma used to be like 260hp now due to new SAE specs. its only 240. The engine never changed.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 06:09 PM
  #8  
stormin94's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,222
Likes: 4
From: Lake County, CA/Sacramento
They might have changed the Standards for measuring Horsepower around that time. It may be measured at the flywheel for the Taco, and maybe at the wheels for the 4Runner. Just a thought...
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 06:34 PM
  #9  
22R-to-5VZFE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Fort Collins, Co
Yeah I know the rear diff is the 4.10 because I found the original window sticker in the glove box today. Sticker price was $32,000 too! YIkes!!

Anyone know what the rear diff in a 95.5 Tacoma with same motor and tranny is? Its extended cab but no badging any where.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 06:47 PM
  #10  
fillsrunner4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,906
Likes: 2
From: Woodinville, wa
if they were measured at the wheels the weight would matter just a bit. its only 7hp. if measured at the crank there would be no difference due to the fact its the same motor. i do know that you add more oil i believe to a 4runner which might slow the crank a bit but help better lubricate the motor since it has to push more weight. these are both 5spd right?
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 06:54 PM
  #11  
89macrunner's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,057
Likes: 1
From: Tempe, AZ
NO manufacturer does their dyno tests at the wheels..it would make their specs look lower.

Tranny prolly isnt even used for the dyno test.

And if its measured at the wheels weight would still have 0 effect on torque or horsepower..how much the vehicle ways has ABSOUTELY nothing to do with how much power its engine can make.

The differences are probably from SAE changes..thats it
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 06:59 PM
  #12  
22R-to-5VZFE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Fort Collins, Co
Yeah I guess I'll have to accept the SAE awnser. How about the rear end differences? Anyone know for sure?
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 06:59 PM
  #13  
Ian Rogers's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
From: Mill Valley, Ca
I think that it sums up to Cail smog stuff a 4-runner falls into a different class that a pick-up for emissions. So on the pick-up Toyota can change the fuel and timing. BTW i just put out 156 RWHP and 166 RWHP (stock/header)

Last edited by Ian Rogers; Sep 24, 2007 at 07:01 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 07:02 PM
  #14  
AppleJack's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
From: Medford, Oregon
It is as others mentioned, all in the exhaust. It's the same for Jeep Cherokee's vs. Wranglers even though they may both have a 4.0 Cherokee's have longer exhaust pipes that aid in building up the velocity of the out going exhaust, much like a long barreled vs. a short barreled rifle.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 07:09 PM
  #15  
CASTAIC 4RUNNER's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: Castaic, California
ill bet you wouldnt even notice 7 hp anyway
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 07:23 PM
  #16  
KevinInSac's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 6
From: Sacramento, CA (Carmichael)
Originally Posted by CASTAIC 4RUNNER
ill bet you wouldnt even notice 7 hp anyway
Funny, tons of people buy K&N cold air set ups for a supposed hp gain around that.


I don't codone the purchase of such units either. heh
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 07:34 PM
  #17  
Ian Rogers's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
From: Mill Valley, Ca
well 7hp at the wheels is 4.48% that something the butt dino can feel
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2007 | 07:40 PM
  #18  
Ian Rogers's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
From: Mill Valley, Ca
or like taking 165 # off the truck.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2007 | 06:09 AM
  #19  
X-AWDriver's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
From: Littleton,CO
Originally Posted by KevinInSac
Funny, tons of people buy K&N cold air set ups for a supposed hp gain around that.


I don't codone the purchase of such units either. heh

Cutting a hole in the airbox nets 7whp and that's free which makes me cringe even more when I see a freind spend $200+ on a filter setup.

I'm sorry but rearend dynos can't detect such minor HP increases unless you have a miracle butt since a dragstrip run won't show 7whp on a 4Runner and I know from experience. 20whp and then you might be able to tell but on a 4000lb vehicle it's just not really there.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2007 | 06:42 AM
  #20  
pat161's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
From: Central MA
I've always assumed the number difference was exhaust or some other slightly more restrictive piece on the Runners. I doubt it is a change in testing as all 3rd gen runners w/ the 3.4 are rated at 183 while all 95.5-04 V6Tacomas are rated at 190. It is strange though that there is no listed difference between the 4Runner and Tacoma equipped w/ the 2.7 they are all rated to 150.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:12 PM.