Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

Question: Is the 22RE an "Interference Engine"?

Old 08-12-2003, 09:49 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jrallan26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Urbandale, Iowa
Posts: 1,655
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Question: Is the 22RE an "Interference Engine"?

The engine in my 1992 Toyota 4x4 (22RE), Is it a "interference engine"?


Your input is highly appreciated.

Old 08-12-2003, 09:51 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Glenn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: ELN
Posts: 1,647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, it is.
Old 08-12-2003, 03:58 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jrallan26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Urbandale, Iowa
Posts: 1,655
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
that suck!
Old 08-12-2003, 04:09 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
jjdeneen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Lakewood, CA
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what does that mean.....
Old 08-12-2003, 04:23 PM
  #5  
Contributing Member
 
WATRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Duvall, WA
Posts: 5,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As was mentioned, yes, it is an intereference engine...

If the timing belt does break or jump a notch while the engine is running, the results will "interfere" in a serious way with your long-term savings plan. (Here's how it happens: in an "interference" engine, it's possible for open valves to hit an upward-moving piston, resulting in a collision that could best be described as "apocalyptic.")
Old 08-12-2003, 05:33 PM
  #6  
Banned
 
flecker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: White Mountains, Arizona (Yes it does snow in AZ)
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey Jrallen, when your timing belt chain broke... did you tweak a valve? That seriously sucks if you did... I remember your post a while back when you asked about the chain breakage. You may have to get a head re-done... KA-Ching! Hopefully I am mistaken
Old 08-12-2003, 05:47 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
Glenn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: ELN
Posts: 1,647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by WATRD
As was mentioned, yes, it is an intereference engine...

If the timing belt does break or jump a notch while the engine is running, the results will "interfere" in a serious way with your long-term savings plan. (Here's how it happens: in an "interference" engine, it's possible for open valves to hit an upward-moving piston, resulting in a collision that could best be described as "apocalyptic.")
This is not always true. I have heard more than one instance from reliable sources of timing chains breaking or coming off with no valvetrain or other engine damage. Much depends on the RPM the engine is turning. In the cases that I know of, the engine was idling when the chain broke. Everything was checked out at a machine shop and no damage was found.

On the other hand, if the chain breaks at high RPM, disaster is almost a certainity.
Old 08-12-2003, 05:52 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
Glenn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: ELN
Posts: 1,647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by jrallan26
that suck!
Designing engines as interference engines allows them to more easily achieve high compression, among other benefits.

If the maintenance is kept up, i.e., timing belts or chains replaced when manufacturer recommends and so forth, it's a non-issue.
Old 08-12-2003, 06:10 PM
  #9  
Contributing Member
 
WATRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Duvall, WA
Posts: 5,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Glenn
This is not always true. I have heard more than one instance from reliable sources of timing chains breaking or coming off with no valvetrain or other engine damage. Much depends on the RPM the engine is turning. In the cases that I know of, the engine was idling when the chain broke. Everything was checked out at a machine shop and no damage was found.

On the other hand, if the chain breaks at high RPM, disaster is almost a certainity.
It's not so much dependant upon the RPM as it is the position of the camshaft when the break happens. It's a luck of the draw thing and if you have a valve open and the piston comes up, *crunch*. Every interference motor I have ever shapped a chain on has required a tear down to see what the valves and pistons looked like. Not all have been damaged, but most have. At least with a non-interference motor, you can line everything back up, slide on a new belt and go on about your merry way.

Last edited by WATRD; 08-12-2003 at 07:35 PM.
Old 08-12-2003, 07:31 PM
  #10  
Guest
 
4RUNR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North Pole
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is the 3.4l interference also?
Old 08-12-2003, 07:33 PM
  #11  
Contributing Member
 
WATRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Duvall, WA
Posts: 5,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by 4RUNR
Is the 3.4l interference also?
Nope
Old 08-12-2003, 07:54 PM
  #12  
Guest
 
4RUNR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North Pole
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Excellent. There's a sticker on my timing belt cover which says it was changed in the middle 50k miles. Kind of early?
Old 08-12-2003, 07:58 PM
  #13  
Contributing Member
 
WATRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Duvall, WA
Posts: 5,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think 60k is the recommended interval, so I don't think that is unreasonable. I change mine out every 30k. Better safe than sorry and I have no desire to have one fail when I need it most.
Old 08-12-2003, 08:03 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
Plays_with_Toys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Parker, Colorado
Posts: 1,564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Every 60k??? Is this for belts only, or also for chains? I don't think the chain on mine has ever been replaced, but I don't have the time or money to get into my engine to change it right now, but I'd like to know for future referance.
Old 08-12-2003, 08:18 PM
  #15  
Contributing Member
 
WATRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Duvall, WA
Posts: 5,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry, I should have been more specific. 60k is for a belt. The chains have a much longer service interval in most cases.
Old 08-12-2003, 08:36 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
Glenn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: ELN
Posts: 1,647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Plays_with_Toys
Every 60k??? Is this for belts only, or also for chains? I don't think the chain on mine has ever been replaced, but I don't have the time or money to get into my engine to change it right now, but I'd like to know for future referance.
60K is for belts. If you have a 22R or 22RE, the timing chain guides are the major concern.
Old 08-12-2003, 08:53 PM
  #17  
Contributing Member
 
WATRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Duvall, WA
Posts: 5,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here's a bit more along those lines.

http://www.4x4wire.com/toyota/reviews/doatimingchain/
Old 08-13-2003, 05:37 AM
  #18  
Registered User
 
Highland Runner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Highlands, NC
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 22-re is an interference engine. I have an exhaust valve sitting on my desk to remind me. The chain broke on my sister in law after she bought my 93 truck. It happened when she was starting the truck. Only minor damage. The valve was just slightly bent and the piston had a barley noticable dent. I fixed the chain and bent valve in about 8hrs. Kind of a PITA. I think if an engine (Toyota) has a belt its non interference, with a chain its inteference. There was about 130,000 miles on the truck when it happened. The 22-re doesn't have great guides or a double chain like the old 20r and 22r. You can replace the single row chain with a double from LC Engineering. Check out http://www.lcengineering.com/EngineAccs.htm . Part # 19-205 half way down the page.
Old 08-14-2003, 02:16 PM
  #19  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jrallan26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Urbandale, Iowa
Posts: 1,655
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
!UPDATE! to my 22RE dilema

Is the motor in my 1992 Toyota 4x4 (22RE), Is it an "interference" engine or not?

Update: Just removed the head and front cover. Discovered the head is fine (no bent valves and no bad pistons). Good news! The front cover is toast! Luckily no water jackets were trashed. There is a lot of aluminum bits floating in the motor so we are going to replace the oil pump and water pump and remove the oil pan and clean it for good measure.

The breakdown is actually a blessing in disguise, the head gasket looked like it was on its last legs.

So the parts list includes:

LC Engineering dual timing chain set
LC Engineering front cover
head gasket (OEM)
oil pump (OEM)
water pump (OEM)
Gasket set (OEM)
Head Bolts (ARP)

Am I forgetting anything?

Thanks everyone for all of your help.

Jonathan
Old 08-14-2003, 03:06 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
Glenn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: ELN
Posts: 1,647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: !UPDATE! to my 22RE dilema

So the parts list includes:

LC Engineering dual timing chain set
LC Engineering front cover
head gasket (OEM)
oil pump (OEM)
water pump (OEM)
Gasket set (OEM)
Head Bolts (ARP)

Am I forgetting anything?

Thanks everyone for all of your help.

Jonathan
Sounds like a great plan, but why choose a dual timing chain set over a single? I'm not flaming you or anything, I'm just curious. There are single chain kits with metal backed guides from DOA Racing or engnbldr.com that are less expensive and don't rob as much horsepower.

Last edited by Glenn; 08-14-2003 at 03:07 PM.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Question: Is the 22RE an "Interference Engine"?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:40 PM.