Fuel range update
#21
Originally Posted by midiwall
Yeah... wow. If nothing else, 2k is about the least efficient place for the 3.4L to run. Well, there's idling in your driveway, but that line below 2k is pretty boogy.
I hear that you're getting good mileage, but you're actually wasting fuel by shifting so early.
I hear that you're getting good mileage, but you're actually wasting fuel by shifting so early.
I'll try a higher RPM shift point, but that would typically require more acceleration = dumping fuel.
uberhahn
#23
Originally Posted by uberhahn
I should have made myself more transparent. Though I do shift at 2K, my attention is at minimizing acceleration. In some instances I even wait to accelerate on the highway until I start going downhill
I'll try a higher RPM shift point, but that would typically require more acceleration = dumping fuel.
I'll try a higher RPM shift point, but that would typically require more acceleration = dumping fuel.
These engines are designed to run at 3000-3500 RPM all day, that's the sweet spot. It's one reason why I get 18.5mpg on the highway at an 82mph _average_, but blow 12.5mpg in the city and stop & go traffic.
There are other factors involved of course, but one key one is the _efficency_ of the engine.
#24
Originally Posted by midiwall
These engines are designed to run at 3000-3500 RPM all day, that's the sweet spot. It's one reason why I get 18.5mpg on the highway at an 82mph _average_, but blow 12.5mpg in the city and stop & go traffic.
There are other factors involved of course, but one key one is the _efficency_ of the engine.
There are other factors involved of course, but one key one is the _efficency_ of the engine.
Despite what all the media talking heads are spouting about me driving 55 MPH will save me fuel - I find that 75 nets me better MPG than 55 ever will. Apparently they have not looked at the newer engines and the "sweet spot" that they operate.
Of course they are also telling me to roll down my windows while sitting in traffic. HA - here in Phoenix, I would like to see how long they would last with a 150 degree surface temp on a 4 lane highway.
#25
Ha, now I read all that ^ above.
Well this past tankful I tried an experiment. I drove conservatively for the majority of the tank - slow acceleration, freeway cruising at 65-70, um....that's it really, not much more to it.
My speedo/odo is off a bit, so that said...
The fuel light came on at 240 (Actual: 269) and I filled up at 250 (Actual: 280). I put in 16.75 gallons, so that means I got roughly 16.7 MPG. I bet if i really babied and drove efficiently in the right conditions I could get 300 miles to a tank.
It's no Corolla, but not bad I guess for lifted and armored on 35s.
Well this past tankful I tried an experiment. I drove conservatively for the majority of the tank - slow acceleration, freeway cruising at 65-70, um....that's it really, not much more to it.
My speedo/odo is off a bit, so that said...
The fuel light came on at 240 (Actual: 269) and I filled up at 250 (Actual: 280). I put in 16.75 gallons, so that means I got roughly 16.7 MPG. I bet if i really babied and drove efficiently in the right conditions I could get 300 miles to a tank.
It's no Corolla, but not bad I guess for lifted and armored on 35s.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FS[SouthEast]: Mercury Villager Fan & DCC Fan Controller
coryc85
Misc Stuff (Vehicle Related)
6
Sep 9, 2015 06:24 AM
GreatLakesGuy
The Classifieds GraveYard
8
Sep 4, 2015 09:27 AM
HookahRoo
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
4
Jul 20, 2015 07:06 PM




