95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

97 4runner 3.4ltr mpg??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 10:24 AM
  #1  
fishin4life0228's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
97 4runner 3.4ltr mpg??

So I bought this runner about 6mths ago with plans to make it a camping/trail rig I got some money into it and all that good stuff now. Im totally realizing that i get like 12.5 mpg avg.. I do kinda a lot of city drive but still it sounds outragous. I might as well be driving a 77 cadilliac with a big block. Could there be somthing wrong. I do have jardire exhausat and deckplate mod but thats it as in engine. Thanks in advance
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 10:27 AM
  #2  
FilthyRich's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,218
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, Va
bad 02 sensor??
dirty air filter??
bad fuel filter???
dirrty MAF sensor???
incorrect tire pressure???
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 10:29 AM
  #3  
rimpainter.com's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,916
Likes: 1
Correct calculation?
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 10:37 AM
  #4  
fishin4life0228's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
I changed fuel filter air filter... What am i not worth my calculation haha... 210 miles on a full tank i get.. I will check MAF and 02 today.. thanks for the posts guys!!
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 10:41 AM
  #5  
rimpainter.com's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,916
Likes: 1
Fill up, reset the trip meter. Run it close to E. Divide gallons used by total miles traveled. Repeat 3X (at least), calculate average.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 10:41 AM
  #6  
MTL_4runner's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 3
From: Montreal, QC Canada
Originally Posted by fishin4life0228
I changed fuel filter air filter... What am i not worth my calculation haha... 210 miles on a full tank i get.. I will check MAF and 02 today.. thanks for the posts guys!!
The calculation should be done:
(mileage @ this fillup - mileage @ last fillup) / (gal of gas @ this fillup)

Repeat for more accuracy.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 01:32 PM
  #7  
dragr1's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,707
Likes: 1
From: Auburn, AL
Make sure you use the gallons at fill up, b/c a lot of the 4Runner gas gauges are not accurate, such as mine, and will read empty and still have 4-5 gallons in them.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 06:20 AM
  #8  
X-AWDriver's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
From: Littleton,CO
How amny gallons are you filling up with? Sometimes I only get a little over 210 a tank but I only can squeeze in 15 gallons at fillup so that's more like at least 14mpg.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 08:23 AM
  #9  
Gerdo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 1
From: SouthWest Littleton, Colorado
I would bet on a dirty MAF. You are right My low fuel light comes on and I drive 30-40 more miles. I start to get nervious about running out of gas, it only takes 15 -15.5 gals. The tank on a 2000 is 18.4 gals. I get 20 -21 MPG on my 2000 even when pulling a trailer up the mountains I still get 19 mpg. I just did a trip to SLC and back with 4 adults, the back full and a hitch carrier full and got 20 mpg. At 12.5 mpg you have something wrong.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 08:26 AM
  #10  
Rick F.'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,066
Likes: 0
From: Far western Kentucky (transplanted from central PA)
Be sure you do the calc like MTL_4Runner said, fill-up to fill-up. Forget the PER TANK crap. You want per gallon, and the calculation works whether you put 4 gallons or 14 gallons in...
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2006 | 03:25 PM
  #11  
werdwerd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by fishin4life0228
So I bought this runner about 6mths ago with plans to make it a camping/trail rig I got some money into it and all that good stuff now. Im totally realizing that i get like 12.5 mpg avg.. I do kinda a lot of city drive but still it sounds outragous. I might as well be driving a 77 cadilliac with a big block. Could there be somthing wrong. I do have jardire exhausat and deckplate mod but thats it as in engine. Thanks in advance
I bought a 97 4runner about 2 months ago and have the same problem.
I need a tune up and hope that will help! it sucks!
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2006 | 04:50 PM
  #12  
cancow's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
I get 16 in the city and I thought that was bad.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2006 | 08:09 AM
  #13  
X-AWDriver's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
From: Littleton,CO
Actually I've been getting over 230 a tank lately (I think tire pressure was low before) and only getting 14 gallons in when I think it's empty so I'm up just over 16mpg which I can deal with.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2006 | 08:30 AM
  #14  
MTL_4runner's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 3
From: Montreal, QC Canada
Tire pressure is a biggy with fuel economy.....about 1 psi lost for every 10 degree drop.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2006 | 11:01 AM
  #15  
vegaskurt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
From: Reno, NV
Im getting about 15 to 17 mpg right now. On long freeway trips its closer to 19. I recently did the fuel filter so I hope it goes up a little more (fingers crossed).

When I got the truck the mpg was bad but it improved after running an injector cleaner, changing the plugs, wires and air filter. Cleaning the MAF is next and the O2 is dead last on my list.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2006 | 12:52 PM
  #16  
surf4runner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,476
Likes: 1
From: so.cal
is there much of a diff between the 3.4L in gen2 vs gen3?

seems like the gen2's get worse MPG.

im stock and get 300mi+ b4 the idiot light comes on, never had below 18mpg
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2006 | 10:24 AM
  #17  
X-AWDriver's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
From: Littleton,CO
2nd gen Runners have a 3.0 and it generally gets worse gas mileage and has 30 less ponies so you get kicked in the nuts twice.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2006 | 11:18 AM
  #18  
Toyo-Mama's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: SW Michigan
Don't forget to count any discrepancies with over sized tires... my 33's have my numbers (both speedo and odo) off by about 18%, and consequently, my mpg figures as well. Even so, my gen1 3.0 (lifted with the 33's) only gets 14mpg, my old gen1 with stock tires gets 17mpg, and my gen2 3.0 got 15 before the thrown rod.

Last edited by Toyo-Mama; Mar 18, 2006 at 11:19 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2006 | 07:50 AM
  #19  
amorphous's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
From: Greenleaf, Ore
Originally Posted by Toyo-Mama
Don't forget to count any discrepancies with over sized tires... my 33's have my numbers (both speedo and odo) off by about 18%, and consequently, my mpg figures as well. Even so, my gen1 3.0 (lifted with the 33's) only gets 14mpg, my old gen1 with stock tires gets 17mpg, and my gen2 3.0 got 15 before the thrown rod.
yah, if you have 285s (metric 33"s) and your old size was a metric 31" - you need to multiply by 1.072 to get your "true" gas mileage. It might be better than you think!

aaron
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2006 | 04:40 PM
  #20  
jwbehm's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
14.5 mpg here on a stock 99 4Runner 4x4 manual. I think my tire pressure is messed up though. Hopefully it will be better once it gets warmer
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:40 PM.