890 vs 891
09-17-2007, 05:06 PM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
890 vs 891
I've searched until I'm blue in the face. I have 890's. I'm offroading alot more, haluing alot more, and camping alot more, BUT I dont want a kidney jarring ride in the rear. If I changed to 891's how would it ride with the N86C's vs. the N86's? Would it be bareable unloaded?
09-17-2007, 05:14 PM
#2
I've searched until I'm blue in the face. I have 890's. I'm offroading alot more, haluing alot more, and camping alot more, BUT I dont want a kidney jarring ride in the rear. If I changed to 891's how would it ride with the N86C's vs. the N86's? Would it be bareable unloaded?
09-17-2007, 05:27 PM
#4
What do you mean stock rear? It was all OME...I had the normal shocks, not the comfort ones...whatever part # that is..with 891s in the rear and 882s up front with a winch and ARB. 
09-17-2007, 05:32 PM
#5
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stock as in bumper wise. I've heard the 882's are extremely stiff. How do they compare to the Tundra's?
09-17-2007, 05:40 PM
#6
Bamachem bought my 882s and hated them cause they were so stiff...it is actually what got him looking into the Tundra stuff.
I have no idea how they compare to the Tundra lift but I would imagine the Tundra lift would ride much better....just a guess since that is what bamachem stuck with and has made so famous
I have no idea how they compare to the Tundra lift but I would imagine the Tundra lift would ride much better....just a guess since that is what bamachem stuck with and has made so famous
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Carbonized
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
5
02-10-2005 04:29 AM
4FonZ
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
15
04-12-2004 08:52 AM
