Notices
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

426 Hemi Powered Yoda

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-02-2005, 05:31 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
trx125's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Youfalla, Al
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
426 Hemi Powered Yoda

I think I am going to dump the 22RE and swap in a 426 Hemi, 2"BL, and 5.29's and Loockers both front and rear. All I have to do is sell my house and mortgage my wife and kid! Any Takers
trx125 is offline  
Old 02-02-2005, 05:51 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
kyle_22r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 3,981
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
might as well make it a mid engine, a 426 is about the size of an entire toy front end
kyle_22r is offline  
Old 02-02-2005, 06:04 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: West Columbia, SC
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

88toy4x4 is offline  
Old 02-02-2005, 06:34 PM
  #4  
Contributing Member
 
uboatcmndr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: springfield, mo
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"How much for your girls? I want to buy your daughters. Sell them to me." not an exact quote but you get the idea. John Belushi in The Blues Brothers. Bore and stroke a chevy small block maybe(383) .
uboatcmndr is offline  
Old 02-02-2005, 10:38 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
kyle_22r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 3,981
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
never understood the 383 thing...why not just run a 400?
kyle_22r is offline  
Old 02-02-2005, 10:42 PM
  #6  
Banned
 
jimbo74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Nor*Cal
Posts: 6,590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kyle_22r
never understood the 383 thing...why not just run a 400?


becasue a 400 is bigger then a 350 with a 400 crank
jimbo74 is offline  
Old 02-03-2005, 03:13 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
3car's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Crystal River, Florida
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by jimabena74
becasue a 400 is bigger then a 350 with a 400 crank
say what? in terms of cubic inches, obviously. physical dimensions are the same.
3car is offline  
Old 02-03-2005, 03:35 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
Phssthpok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The Land of Beer and Coffee
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 3car
say what? in terms of cubic inches, obviously. physical dimensions are the same.

Chevy made a 400 small block as well as a 400 Big block .

The small blocks external dimentions are dang-nigh identical, but the big block is ...well.. bigger.

I never did understand the whole 383 thing myself. The only reason I can see going that route is the ability to get the longer stroke (better mechanical leverage = more torque) without having to get the extra (gas consuming) cubic inches. In addidtion, the reciprocating mass at the end of the connecting rod (read: The pistons) have much to do with the max rev capability of any given engine. Bigger pistons = more mass = greater possibility of rod stretch/failure at higher RPM, so a 383 stroker would probabbly have a higher redline, ergo the reason they are so popular with the musclecar crowd.....Torque of a big block, withthe redline of a small block.
Phssthpok is offline  
Old 02-03-2005, 03:40 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
91 4Runner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ameliasburgh, On. Ca.
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Use an Olds 403 more torque
91 4Runner is offline  
Old 02-03-2005, 04:00 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
ayoung101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: detroit, mi
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
but the 350 small block is one of the easiest and cheapest engine to get (including parts) in the world. ESPECIALLY in america. that's why most people use it for a swap. it puts out decent power stock, and can put out plenty of power when modified. and for an american engine, it's one of the more reliable engine. when and if i ever blow my 22re, i'm probably gonna swap in a built 350 (383). they're so easy to find and to work on, ya know? i would PREFER a toyota v-8, to keep it a toyota, but those are rather rare and quite expensive. even the smaller engines that are toyota are rare and expensive to find stateside. until then though, my 22re can go almost everyplace my offroading buddies with their big block chevy 454's can go, so i don't have any complaints.

not to mention, a chevy 350 will get about the same gas mileage on my truck (if not BETTER) than my 4cyl 22re! i only get about 15 mpg with my hog! and that's on a good day!
ayoung101 is offline  
Old 02-03-2005, 04:20 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
ken.vs.ryu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hmmm i wanted to put a yota v8 in a dodge ram. :confused:
ken.vs.ryu is offline  
Old 02-03-2005, 07:40 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
ayoung101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: detroit, mi
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ken.vs.ryu
hmmm i wanted to put a yota v8 in a dodge ram. :confused:
by all means, if you can get a toyota v8 for a decent price, then do it. i'm just saying that they're not easy to come by. especially in comparison to a chevy 350.

i haven't heard of too many people putting foreign engines into domestic vehicles though. keep us posted.
ayoung101 is offline  
Old 02-03-2005, 07:43 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
naksukow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Big Bear or Tahoe
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you can get lexus 4.0 V8 very cheap.
naksukow is offline  
Old 02-03-2005, 08:11 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
ayoung101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: detroit, mi
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by naksukow
you can get lexus 4.0 V8 very cheap.
really? how much and where? and how easy would it be to put in my truck? and with which 4wd tranny?

i never really thought about a lexus engine in my truck. . . . . . .
ayoung101 is offline  
Old 02-03-2005, 08:39 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
naksukow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Big Bear or Tahoe
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would search your local bone yards first, then try some of the online sites. It won't be a drop in solution, you will need to spend some time on wiring, fabrication, etc.

**edit I have seen some people pic them up complete with harness and acc. for under $500.**
naksukow is offline  
Old 02-03-2005, 09:16 AM
  #16  
Registered User
 
Flamedx4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: 100 miles offshore as much as possible, & Springfield Oregon USA
Posts: 3,291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 383 small block is a great offroad engine. More torque, and a longer stroke gets better mileage. High rpm is not good with long stroke, (you want to rev get a 327) but you don't want high rpm off road, you want lots of low end torque. It's easy, cheap, and dead reliable. That's why its so popular.
Flamedx4 is offline  
Old 02-03-2005, 12:18 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
kyle_22r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 3,981
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by 91 4Runner
Use an Olds 403 more torque
yes but unless it's one of the super rare blocks from a car with a tow package, it has windowed main webs and isn't really strong. in general terms, quality-wise with the buick-oldsmobile-pointiac family, pontiac is the best, buick is good, and oldsmobile is poor.

i'm quite partial to buick engines, if i was swapping in a V8 i'd look into a buick/rover 215 -- 5lbs more than a 22R since it's all-aluminum. also, the smallblock ford gets overlooked despite being nearly as cheap to build as a smallblock chevy. it's 100lbs lighter than the chevy, shorter and narrower.
kyle_22r is offline  
Old 02-03-2005, 03:17 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
Phssthpok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: The Land of Beer and Coffee
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kyle_22r
also, the smallblock ford gets overlooked despite being nearly as cheap to build as a smallblock chevy. it's 100lbs lighter than the chevy, shorter and narrower.
Meanwhile the Mopar LA engines seem to be the kicked puppy of the litter. The 318 is nigh indestructable, the 340 is a legendary screamer, and the 360 shines best when grunt is needed...all three have excellent Tq charisteristics for their respective displacement, owing largely to their 6.123" long connecting rods. (by comparison, the 'trick' rods for chevy are 6" even)
Phssthpok is offline  
Old 02-03-2005, 04:39 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
kyle_22r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 3,981
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
i think the thing about mopar is that nobody ever seems to really know much about them. i've heard they have a lower power-to-weight ratio than ford or chevy, but don't have any proof to back it up. i know i've seen a 318 swap done into a celica.

i'd imagine it would be a cool, unique swap -- if you can get some aluminum heads!

my favorite non "big 3" V8s are the amc 304-360-401. only problem is that none of them have been produced in over 20 years except the 360(production ended in the early 90s with the demise of the FSJ wagoneer, the 5.9 in newer jeeps is a mopar 360)
kyle_22r is offline  
Old 02-03-2005, 05:02 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
SD70MAC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lilburn, GA
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe you can also help me put a Cat C-16 or maybe a Cummins N14 in mine!
SD70MAC is offline  


Quick Reply: 426 Hemi Powered Yoda



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:01 PM.