95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

4:88's and 33's a good conbo?

Old Jun 17, 2010 | 06:32 AM
  #101  
naksukow's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: Big Bear or Tahoe
I have 4.88s with 33s and wish I had gone with 5.29s. If you ever drive a fully loaded truck up at elevation 7,000+ feet, you will wish you had 5.29s to...LOL

and a supercharger.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2010 | 07:01 AM
  #102  
Mauzer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 529
Likes: 3
From: TX
Originally Posted by naksukow
I have 4.88s with 33s and wish I had gone with 5.29s. If you ever drive a fully loaded truck up at elevation 7,000+ feet, you will wish you had 5.29s to...LOL

and a supercharger.
Thats what I figured, I carry a lot of weight and its only going to get heavier.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2010 | 11:10 AM
  #103  
rideexileex's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: Seattle / Bozeman, MT
Originally Posted by paynemw
I have a 2000 T4R 5VZ-FE 5spd with 33's uparmored and I plan on doing a SC down the road... It sounds like either 4.88's or 5.29s..... i'm still unsure, I'm guessing 5.29s souly because scotty said they're pretty legit, and Brian2sun said those 5.29s will make the truck seem more stock, which would be legit... any suggestions? oh and redelixxixi whatever yer name is, why don't you do electric lockers all around, no air lines n
That's an option for the rear, but I haven't seen that for the front end. I also think the onboard air is a bit of a perk with the ARB.

But for everyone saying now that they want the 5.29's, how much actual highway driving to you do? I drive at 80mph quite often at 5000 ft
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2010 | 01:27 PM
  #104  
naksukow's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: Big Bear or Tahoe
Originally Posted by rideexileex
That's an option for the rear, but I haven't seen that for the front end. I also think the onboard air is a bit of a perk with the ARB.

But for everyone saying now that they want the 5.29's, how much actual highway driving to you do? I drive at 80mph quite often at 5000 ft

Its not the speed. Its the hill climbs. I have rock sliders, skid plates, heavy front and rear bumpers, winch with steel cable, high lift, OBA, tools, spare axle, wife, 2 kids, carseats, dog, fridge.....you begin to see the picture. My truck is very heavy loaded out for road trips. That and driving through mountain passes in California, Utah, and Colorado at 35 mph at 5500rpm made me wish for a little more gearing. All that weight up at 7000' + made for some interesting driving.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2010 | 01:02 AM
  #105  
paynemw's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach, VA
I def do a bunch of highway driving... and I do enjoy driving fast in the mountains... but now my concern is, will these 5.29 gears be good all around: wheelin', driving wild on the streets, towing, and highway speeds... I guess I should have included my task and purpose. Task: determine a gear ratio and brand to use on my 2000 T4R 3.4L 5spd uparmored Purpose: to know the best all around gear ratio to use for my truck to ensure I have a renaissance capable T4R... thanks for the future inputs
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2010 | 03:15 PM
  #106  
xcmountain80's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
From: Jupiter, FL
This thread has taken off! I still dont feel like you have addressed 285'2 32.8" tires with 4.88's. I like my 4.88 295 combo just fine, I get 17 mpg on average but don't deal with elevations often.

A
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2010 | 10:52 AM
  #107  
rideexileex's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: Seattle / Bozeman, MT
Originally Posted by xcmountain80
This thread has taken off! I still dont feel like you have addressed 285'2 32.8" tires with 4.88's. I like my 4.88 295 combo just fine, I get 17 mpg on average but don't deal with elevations often.

A
That's interesting because I'm getting about 17-18 mpg highway with 285's AT and 4.10's.

So to specify, obviously the lower gears (5.29) are better for the weight/hills, but for someone doing a lot of highway cruising in addition to occasional wheeling, 4.88 is in the best interest for keeping 75-80 on the highway?
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2010 | 02:55 PM
  #108  
oneraindog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: seattle, wa
is there a similar thread that talks about 4.88 with 33s in a manual 4cyl?
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2010 | 07:02 AM
  #109  
crolison's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,571
Likes: 2
From: TN
Originally Posted by oneraindog
is there a similar thread that talks about 4.88 with 33s in a manual 4cyl?
Get 5.29s, I ran them with 33's in my 4banger 4runner
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2010 | 03:55 PM
  #110  
ScottyC's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,477
Likes: 0
From: Ft Collins, CO
I saw this on the front page again and figured I would chime in.

Okay, so here you go:

A/T, 5.29s, 33s. @ 80mph you will be pulling 3016rpms

A/T, 4.88s, 33s @ 80mph you will be pulling 2782 rpms

M/T, 5.29s, 33s @ 80mph you will be pulling 3663 rpms

M/T, 4.88s, 33s @ 80mph you will be pulling 3379 rpms

So, compare it to stock:

A/T 4.30 gears, 265s @ 80mph 2610rpms

A/T 4.10 gears, 265s @ 80mph 2489rpms

M/T 4.30 gears, 265s @ 80mph 3169 rpms

M/T 4.10 gears, 265s @ 80mph 3022 rpms

And, if you want to calculate it yourself, here you go:
http://www.csgnetwork.com/multirpmcalc.html

FWIW, I now run 37s with the new rig. Solid axles with Land Cruiser 3rds in each axle. 5.29s and I still have the auto. I installed the Supercharger when it was down for the build up.

So, my new current setup is running 2690 rpms & 80mpg. The supercharger makes a major difference. And, the lack of having the front end turning 24/7 helps too. Without it I would be pretty unhappy with the setup though.

Last edited by ScottyC; Sep 27, 2010 at 04:04 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
coleypull15
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
24
Nov 3, 2015 07:41 AM
Michael oaks
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
18
Jul 27, 2015 11:47 AM
PlayAwhile
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
5
Jul 20, 2015 11:36 AM
TURBOrunnerNM
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
0
Jul 20, 2015 08:31 AM
Jnkml
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
3
Jul 6, 2015 01:20 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:17 AM.