95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

3.4 - Non Interference confirmed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 25, 2009 | 05:11 PM
  #1  
GVOLCRunner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
3.4 - Non Interference confirmed

So, Ive heard it from several people on here the 3.4 is a non-interference engine. YEPPIE, thats always a relief to know if the belt pops you wont due any damage.

BUT WAIT!

Gates - pretty reputable company in terms of info clearly states it is an interference engine??

SO anyone on here who ACTUALLY knows..works at a dealer? Not someone simply talking out their butt cause they heard it from someone who heard it from the Lorax?

Just really curious. Im not saying theres no way Gates is wrong..just would like a clear response.
Attached Thumbnails 3.4  - Non Interference confirmed-guide.jpg   3.4  - Non Interference confirmed-tacoma.jpg  

Last edited by waskillywabbit; Feb 25, 2009 at 06:15 PM. Reason: So there is no confusing other brainless noobs
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2009 | 05:16 PM
  #2  
96runner4x4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
the 5vz is a non interference motor. i know this because i have done my research. the worst that can happen to you, is that you would get stranded and call for a tow if the belt was to snap.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2009 | 05:22 PM
  #3  
waskillywabbit's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3
Likes: 20
Next time you get curious try using This information is ALL over the place and clearly this is a non interference motor.

Reply
Old Feb 25, 2009 | 05:33 PM
  #4  
GVOLCRunner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
AH HA. See theres what im talking about. I goggled the hell out of it. And what do I come to? GATES, a pretty reputable company telling me its an interference.

SO THERE!
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2009 | 05:36 PM
  #5  
waskillywabbit's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3
Likes: 20
Don't make me hurt you.

Reply
Old Feb 25, 2009 | 05:40 PM
  #6  
GVOLCRunner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
nah. I believe you..just wanted to make sure. Sure its just a mess up on Gates part..but wanna make sure.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2009 | 06:06 PM
  #7  
BigBallsMcFalls's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 847
Likes: 1
I checked out the Gates site and the comments section for cam belts
does NOT say interference. so the Gates info is correct. non interference.

I don't know where you find that info on Gates site...cuz I can only find correct info

http://www.gates.com/part_locator/in...cation_id=3598

Last edited by BigBallsMcFalls; Feb 25, 2009 at 06:07 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2009 | 06:12 PM
  #8  
jdsdj98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Hijacking the thread now - With all the reading we've all done on here regarding the 3.4/interference/non-interference/"miles-on-your-timing-belt" questions & answers, there doesn't seem to be a single person, not one, that's told us what happened when their timing belt snapped.

So, I now ask of 3.4 owners - Have you ever experienced a complete timing belt failure? If you haven't, do you know someone who has?

Maybe we're all such maintenance nuts that we actually do the right thing with the 3.4's maintenance.

But isn't it strange that people post far more often with problems than when things go right, yet there don't seem to be any stories about a snapped timing belt in a 3.4? That first hand experience would be the story that would answer the interference/non-interference question absolutely (even though we already know the answer), and would probably be an interesting read at the very least.

Tell those stories of snapped timing belts in the 3.4, if you have 'em, please!
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2009 | 06:48 PM
  #9  
arjan's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,610
Likes: 0
From: Mission, British Columbia
When a timing belt on a 3.4L snaps, then the only thing it interferes with is your pride.

Not fun sitting in a Toyota, parked on the side of the highway.

Haven't had a timing belt snap. Actually I've never been stranded in almost 20yrs of driving now.
Knocking on a lot of wood now by the way.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 06:34 AM
  #10  
BigBallsMcFalls's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 847
Likes: 1
I have had a timing belt snap. what you notice is a sudden loss of power, and MIL light comes on. it is exactly the same feeling as shutting off the engine while driving.

you have to get to the side of the road. and then you try to start it, it just cranks
and nothing else happens.


that is about it. it is a huge non-event
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 06:43 AM
  #11  
02_Limited's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
From: McLean, Virginia
Originally Posted by BigBallsMcFalls
I have had a timing belt snap. what you notice is a sudden loss of power, and MIL light comes on. it is exactly the same feeling as shutting off the engine while driving.

you have to get to the side of the road. and then you try to start it, it just cranks
and nothing else happens.


that is about it. it is a huge non-event
This happened to me too. The water pump bit the bullet right before the belt snapped. I was doing about 15 MPH after pulling away from a red light. The water pump chewed up two of it's bearings, made something of a snap-crackle-pop all in one noise (a la Rice Krispies) and the engine just died while I coasted to the shoulder
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 06:59 AM
  #12  
mt_goat's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 5
From: Oklahoma State
You guys that had one break, how many miles were on them?

Last edited by mt_goat; Feb 27, 2009 at 05:57 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 07:15 AM
  #13  
turboale's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,868
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY
On my white truck I had a belt slip two teeth when I sank my truck/hit a mud wall at 30mph. After draining all the fluids etc they called me and said it was dog slow. I said that shouldn't be the case and drove it confirming that something was not right. After a couple days they finally figured it out, the timing belt had somehow slipped two teeth. How, I have no idea as I killed the motor going into the hole (I knew I wasn't getting out and it was going to be wet). Either way, they put everything back and it was fine. Then 20k after that I slapped an S/C on it and it never skipped a beat!
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 08:34 AM
  #14  
raydouble's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, Washington
Originally Posted by mt_goat
Yuo guys that had one break, how many miles were on them?
I'd like to know this too, just out of curiosity.

Not that I'm going to push my luck, I'm changing mine at 90 K
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 12:49 PM
  #15  
txt4r's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: TX
Originally Posted by raydouble
I'd like to know this too, just out of curiosity.

Not that I'm going to push my luck, I'm changing mine at 90 K
I'd like to know, too. Did that happen to your 3rd Gen 4Runner? If so, how many miles on it when that happened? Thanks.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 12:56 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
A friend had his timing belt come loose after a poor timing belt job, does that count (left him stranded in another state)

Last edited by Roadtripr; Feb 26, 2009 at 02:49 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 01:27 PM
  #17  
Fink's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,076
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
I've heard anywhere from 80k-160k.
I always get mine done a little before 90k but I'm a preventative man.

Fink
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 03:07 PM
  #18  
slacker's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,375
Likes: 297
From: BC Canada
there is a simple rule with Toyota engines .. up to 2005 anyway .. and i'm sure will spark up a few skeptics and nay sayers but here is a fact!

any toyota vehicle with a timing BELT .. is NON- interferance .

any toyotas vehicle with a timing CHAIN ... is and interferance engine .



.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 06:13 PM
  #19  
pkt1213's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
I think mine had about 140 on it when I changed the belt and pump. I bought it with 110 and and I am sure it had never been done because when I changed it it looked the the tensioner had been on there since 98.
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 06:25 PM
  #20  
GVOLCRunner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
Oh and I resent being referred to as a noob. Ive rebuilt engines, trannys...been a garage monkey longer than some of you have been alive... was simply curious DANG IT!
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:27 AM.