95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

170 Thermostat ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 06:20 AM
  #1  
saulgoode's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
From: Houston
170 Thermostat ?

I'm going to flush my radiator this weekend and change out the thermostat while I'm at it, I was wondering if putting in a 170 therm on a stock 3.4 would have any added benefit over a 180 therm? I searched thru the threads and all I could find was engines that have the SC and or URD. Any feedback is appreciated!
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 06:58 AM
  #2  
mt_goat's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 5
From: Oklahoma State
It would help cool your auto tranny better, but I see you have a Hayden cooler so you may not need that benefit.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 07:37 AM
  #3  
saulgoode's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Will it give any performance such as better mpg, more hp assuming that the engine will be running cooler? Are there any drawbacks to using a cooler therm on a stock engine as opposed to using the 180 therm?
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 07:39 AM
  #4  
04 Rocko Taco's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 0
you want to make sure that your engine does warm up to 'operating temps' it burns gas more efficently that way, and helps keep the oil the right consistency, but I would think that 170 is as good as 180, my thinking is that it may not help a lot, but I dont really see that it can hurt.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 08:13 AM
  #5  
mt_goat's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 5
From: Oklahoma State
Originally Posted by saulgoode
Will it give any performance such as better mpg, more hp assuming that the engine will be running cooler? Are there any drawbacks to using a cooler therm on a stock engine as opposed to using the 180 therm?
Nope, if anything it will hurt the fuel economy just a fraction.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 08:15 AM
  #6  
Finelygotone's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento
Here is a good article on the benefits and drawbacks of using different temp thermostats. http://www.carnut.com/ramblin/cool3.html Looks like 180 is a good combination between power and engine wear.....

I think the reason a 170 is used at all is to help combat localized hot spots and the dreaded "pinging" that can be induced by supercharging and higher cylinder pressures/intake charge temperatures.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 08:32 AM
  #7  
saulgoode's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally Posted by Finelygotone
Here is a good article on the benefits and drawbacks of using different temp thermostats. http://www.carnut.com/ramblin/cool3.html Looks like 180 is a good combination between power and engine wear.....

I think the reason a 170 is used at all is to help combat localized hot spots and the dreaded "pinging" that can be induced by supercharging and higher cylinder pressures/intake charge temperatures.
Good link, I think I'll just change out the old therm and put in an OEM 180 therm and flush the system. Thanks everyone for the feedback!
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 08:33 AM
  #8  
mt_goat's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 5
From: Oklahoma State
Yeah, good link. Thanks
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 08:59 AM
  #9  
X-AWDriver's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
From: Littleton,CO
A bottle of Redline's Waterwetter does actually help maintain a little cooler head temp. I ran a bottle of this and a 10/90 mixture of coolant/water in my Eclipse in during summer race season.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 09:01 AM
  #10  
jimbob's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Hmmm.... kinda makes you wonder about the 160 (I believe) that TRD puts in the 7th kit - don't it???
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 09:35 AM
  #11  
saulgoode's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally Posted by jimbob
Hmmm.... kinda makes you wonder about the 160 (I believe) that TRD puts in the 7th kit - don't it???
That's kinda why I started this thread, in searching all I found was 160 and 170 therm's in engines that were SC'd.

By the way not to digress from the topic, does anyone recommend a brand of flush or should I just stick with water?
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 11:37 AM
  #12  
MTL_4runner's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 3
From: Montreal, QC Canada
Originally Posted by saulgoode
That's kinda why I started this thread, in searching all I found was 160 and 170 therm's in engines that were SC'd.

By the way not to digress from the topic, does anyone recommend a brand of flush or should I just stick with water?
Just flush with water, the flush chemicals can do more harm than good.
Check out this thread for all the coolant info (warning, possible info overload):

https://www.yotatech.com/forums/show...900#post811900
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 12:44 PM
  #13  
saulgoode's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Jaime,

That is some well informed reading, Thanks for the heads up!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kawazx636
The Classifieds GraveYard
34
Oct 6, 2021 03:03 PM
wberry85
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
8
May 17, 2016 05:45 PM
White Stripe
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
4
Oct 6, 2015 10:47 AM
rmill05
84-85 Trucks & 4Runners
0
Sep 27, 2015 01:43 PM
LotOMiles
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
8
Sep 14, 2015 11:45 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:46 AM.