All Other Toyota Swaps I4, I6, Lexus V8

1UZFE swap into 2nd Gen 4Runner

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 16, 2005 | 08:43 PM
  #101  
Flygtenstein's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,216
Likes: 1
From: Fort Collins, CO
Coupler leaks. Right through the middle. First mine crapped the seal, now mine leaks through. Common enough on the auto's, only two don't.

The coupler is the same auto to 5 spd on late model stuff. The auto causes problems because of higher pressure, thinner fluid and being right near a jet.

I am not putting as many miles on the truck anymore, so I don't really give a darn about it. It leaks, keep an eye on it.

I have not read all the ways suggested, but Marlin has, supposedly, tried them all. Machining limitations prevent a pure billet piece, not to mention you need to get something down in there to push on the shaft to get it out.

My cheap advice? Stop calling Marlin, they are frying bigger fish. This problem is only a problem for maybe 25 people, and that could be off. It will get fixed when it is fixed. Get one with JB Weld and run it. This is a pretty minor part of a huge project.

At Marlin, talk to Dave. You will never, or almost never get to Marlin and Dave is as good as it gets.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 09:00 AM
  #102  
Praufet's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 833
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth/College Station, TX
Hey why not cut the couple in half and weld it back together with a disc in between the two pieces? You'd have to make a spacer it increase the width of the adapter plate most likely, but is should work.
More ascii art

Old piece

=========
23 28

new
23 28
====|=====
^^
weld there

Not sure how good you are with Al mike but your new welder sure looks like it is up to the task.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 09:57 AM
  #103  
firemedic's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
From: Camas, WA USA
I'm not a welder, but I imagine since all the power from the engine goes through that one piece, they wouldn't want to subject a weld to that kind of force, it would also have to be a perfectly lined up, and balanced/centered finished piece, probably tough to do...
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 10:16 AM
  #104  
Praufet's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 833
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth/College Station, TX
true, but not impossible, just throwing ideas out there. Still don't see why you can just cnc it.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 10:32 AM
  #105  
dlbrunner's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,137
Likes: 0
From: phoenix
How close does the output shaft and input come where the coupler joins them? The machined piece sounds good, but if the input and output shafts are almost touching then the ends may need to be lopped off a little 1/32" or so to allow the barrier to be in place
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 10:33 AM
  #106  
mt_goat's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 5
From: Oklahoma State
Yeah I'm guessing that the coupler is made of hardened/ heat treated steel and welding would destroy those properties. Plus as someone said, you need to be able to use a puller to get it off the shaft so you wouldn't want the center to be blocked with solid steel.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 10:44 AM
  #107  
bamachem's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 0
Likes: 1
Cebby, SS3, Cheese, etc:

This may be a uneducated question, but why not just use some Permatex FIPG on the splines of both sides before you install the coupler? Once the FIPG sets, it should be durable enough to last, and would be just enough of a seal between the two to prevent the fluid loss AND it would flex w/ the thermal expansion/contraction. It would have a good 2-inches of surface to adhere to and should be fine for holding under pressure. Not only that, but it would seal it but wouldn't be permanent so the coupler would still be removable...

It might be worth a try anyway.

Last edited by bamachem; Jun 17, 2005 at 10:46 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 10:53 AM
  #108  
Cebby's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,199
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Well, Marlin is sending his Epoxied version to me that supposedly solves the problem. I'm curious to see how they did it. So far, I think Andy's solution might be the easiest to try if it comes to that.

That sucker is definitely hardened steel. I'm not sure how something like this is made. I don't think they are CNC'd only because it would be difficult to get a tool down inside this thing to cut the grooves. The inside dia is only like 1 1/4 or so.

They told me like a week for the coupler to get done - I've been trying to get through today to see if they can send everything else now so I can build the case assembly sooner.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 11:05 AM
  #109  
mt_goat's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 5
From: Oklahoma State
Originally Posted by bamachem
Cebby, SS3, Cheese, etc:

This may be a uneducated question, but why not just use some Permatex FIPG on the splines of both sides before you install the coupler? Once the FIPG sets, it should be durable enough to last, and would be just enough of a seal between the two to prevent the fluid loss AND it would flex w/ the thermal expansion/contraction. It would have a good 2-inches of surface to adhere to and should be fine for holding under pressure. Not only that, but it would seal it but wouldn't be permanent so the coupler would still be removable...

It might be worth a try anyway.
As I understand it, that was the first thing Marlin tried and it failed for some reason.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 11:35 AM
  #110  
Robinhood150's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,033
Likes: 3
From: Wandering around Phoenix
To make the splines of the coupler they probably use a broach. Basically, it's the male side of the coupler made out of hardened tool steel and they force it through the steel which carves/scrapes out the teeth of the splines. Here's something I googled: http://www.usbroach.net/default_files/broaching.htm

To use a broach, it would need to protrude all the way through the coupler.

As for the permatex failing, I'd bet the torque mashes it all up even though the tolerances are close.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 11:40 AM
  #111  
Cebby's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,199
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Steve - I'd love to see a picture of this method in action. Sounds pretty cool.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 11:51 AM
  #112  
Robinhood150's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,033
Likes: 3
From: Wandering around Phoenix
Here's another:
http://its.foxvalleytech.com/MachSho...roachingIS.htm

I couldn't find any pictures of the process itself. Broaching is also how they cut gears.

You might be able to braze or solder a barrier in there, but if you'd have to find a solder that will wet to steel or a braze material with a low enough melting temp to not destroy the heat treat of the coupler.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 12:17 PM
  #113  
Robinhood150's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,033
Likes: 3
From: Wandering around Phoenix
My friend had this idea of using a rubber high bounce ball jammed in there...or alternatively, get a piece of rubber or better yet a thick piece of silicon gasket material (1/4"?) with a hole in the center. Put a bolt through the hole and a washer on each side. Tighten the bolt and the silicon will expand, sealing the tube. The only thing is we don't know if there's enough room for the bolt.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 12:34 PM
  #114  
Cebby's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,199
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh, PA
I guess we all have our own theories...

I was thinking of hydrocutting (oversize) the same profile as the void in the coupler out of thick silicon material or something with a lower durometer measurement - slightly thicker than the space between the two outputs, then force it down into the coupler. When assembling the case, by bolting the two halves together, the outputs would squeeze the material tightening the seal. Not sure if that would be hard on the bearings though...
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 12:47 PM
  #115  
Cebby's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,199
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh, PA
One more question - are twin sticks a worthwhile investment for a rig that doesn't see a lot of rocks (ie AZ,CO, CA type wheeling) and mostly East Coast terrain?

FROR has them for $150 currently - Marlins are $199. Not sure I even need that. I guess I can add it later.

Any thoughts on this?
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 12:50 PM
  #116  
Cebby's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,199
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by Robinhood150
Thanks for the link. That's pretty cool.

My stuff is going out today with the exception of the coupler.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 01:32 PM
  #117  
dlbrunner's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,137
Likes: 0
From: phoenix
Probably easier to put the twin stick on before the final fitting. From experience messing with linkages while the trans/transfer is in place is a pain. One vote for twin stick, not for any specific reason, but "just because". My Cj3a had twin stick transfer and it was cool to have 2 low for moving a heavy trailer around.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2005 | 04:04 PM
  #118  
sschaefer3's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,278
Likes: 0
From: Tempe, Arizona
I don't have a twin stick, it would not fit in my cup holder. For 2WD low all I have to do is hit the front case down.

Twin stick is cool, but certainly not necessary.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2005 | 02:42 PM
  #119  
Cebby's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,199
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by sschaefer3
I don't have a twin stick, it would not fit in my cup holder. For 2WD low all I have to do is hit the front case down.

Twin stick is cool, but certainly not necessary.
I'm not convinced I would ever need it. That being said, I can think plenty of other things to with the money.

Thanks for the input guys.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2005 | 04:04 PM
  #120  
Cebby's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 11,199
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh, PA
A little more progress today and some comparisons...

6 bolts to remove the VZ bellhousing from the A340F. (the ones around the perimeter - the 4 uppers take a 14mm socket, the 2 lower take a 17mm)



Unbolt the kickdown cable (10mm socket):



Off she comes...



A shot of the A340F without the bellhousing:


Last edited by Cebby; Jun 18, 2005 at 04:25 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:35 AM.