3.4 Swaps The 3.4 V6 Toyota engine

3.4L mileage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 4, 2008 | 07:09 PM
  #1  
TomkiRider's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: Boonies
3.4L mileage

Waht kinda mileage have u guys been getting after a 3.4 swap?
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2008 | 07:34 PM
  #2  
mt_goat's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 5
From: Oklahoma State
I've been getting about the same as I did with the 3.0 (15-16 mpg) but I'm driving much faster (cruising 70-75mph). My truck weighs a little more now too. I haven't tried driving slow yet, I didn't swap in a supercharged 3.4 so I could drive like grandma.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2008 | 07:43 PM
  #3  
TomkiRider's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: Boonies
huh. i think im gettin a little more than that with my 3.0 but then again it is a bigger engine
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2008 | 07:45 PM
  #4  
mt_goat's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 5
From: Oklahoma State
You have a 5 speed too, that helps.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2008 | 08:40 PM
  #5  
RobD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,243
Likes: 5
From: Calgary, AB
Right now, I'm pulling around 450-475 kms per tank, which usually runs about 55 liters. For you non-metric types, that works out to around 19-20 mpg. I'm running a 5 speed with 33s, stock gearing.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2008 | 08:46 PM
  #6  
breknraj's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 899
Likes: 0
From: Summit County, Colorado
I see about 19-20 mpg on my truck - far better than the 14-15 I was getting with the 3.0.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2008 | 09:12 PM
  #7  
JGrund85's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 248
Likes: 1
From: Greeley, Colorado
I would like to say that I knew, but my truck is still in the shop...anyone got one running 35's with 5.29 gearing??
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 03:33 AM
  #8  
mt_goat's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 5
From: Oklahoma State
You guys in high elevations will always get better mileage due to less wind resistance. Other considerations are how fast you drive, 55mph is better than 75mph. Also don't forget some stations are now selling blends of ethanol which gets less mpg too, some won't even tell you either.

Last edited by mt_goat; Jun 5, 2008 at 03:35 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 04:53 AM
  #9  
breknraj's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 899
Likes: 0
From: Summit County, Colorado
Hey, Dale!

Although they might not tell you directly, the stations here in Colorado are required to tag the pumps with a sticker stating how much ethanol is in the fuel. All I have ever seen is 10% on standard gas pumps. It started out as a seasonal thing, but I believe that they run E10 year round, now.

The altitude certainly helps with our milage figures, but I can't say that I take it very easy on the truck on drives back and forth to Denver, and such. The 3.4 is just that much more efficient at producing its power (and I don't have the S/C, either). I would have to attribute most of that gain to the far better ignition system on the 3.4. The modified COP set up is WAY better than the distributor/coil ignition.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 05:00 AM
  #10  
mt_goat's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 5
From: Oklahoma State
Originally Posted by breknraj
... the stations here in Colorado are required to tag the pumps with a sticker stating how much ethanol is in the fuel.
That's good, wish they did that here. I suspect that most are now 10% here because it lowers the price. It may be hard to find pure gasoline now.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 05:24 AM
  #11  
X-AWDriver's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
From: Littleton,CO
Higher elevation usually comes with lots of hill and mountain passes plus our vehicles produce less power making them work harder so our gas mileage isn't really any better overall and I'm getting the same as the flat landers do.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 06:00 AM
  #12  
mt_goat's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 5
From: Oklahoma State
The best mileage I ever got was in Colorado in the 6000-8000 elevation range.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2008 | 07:47 AM
  #13  
Elvota's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,415
Likes: 9
From: Phx, AZ
I think about 16 or just more. About 4 mpg better on average than with the 3.0. My 4Runner has lot's of armor, winch, bumpers and all that jazz. Overall I am still really happy with the swap. More power and more range.

Originally Posted by JGrund85
...anyone got one running 35's with 5.29 gearing??
I am, but I think 4.88's might work better with 35's and the 3.4. I think my revs would drop for hwy driving and increase my MPG.

Then again, I kind of have an excuse to go 37's next time.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 02:57 PM
  #14  
Wheelingnoob's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 350
Likes: 1
From: Surrey, BC
I was considering doing a 3.4 swap for the power and the millage increase but I'm already getting 19mpg on the hwy with my 3.0, so maybe this will just be a power thing
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
primordialbeast117
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
11
Dec 19, 2015 12:23 PM
dzldust
General Vehicle Related Topics (Non Year Related)
7
Oct 6, 2015 05:39 AM
LCE_Performance
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
0
Oct 1, 2015 01:03 PM
EVars
84-85 Trucks & 4Runners
4
Sep 29, 2015 02:06 PM
83
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
18
Sep 21, 2015 06:15 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:22 AM.