Carbonado Redux Run - November 15th
#81
Re: ...
Originally posted by Ducky
Actually if you wouldnt mind, that would be great, till I get the site back to normal, Ill end up putting it up on wa4rocs site, but not in a timely fashion... so please go ahead.
Actually if you wouldnt mind, that would be great, till I get the site back to normal, Ill end up putting it up on wa4rocs site, but not in a timely fashion... so please go ahead.
David? How big is the file? I think that my inbound mail server has a 5meg limit...
Or, if you're comfy with FTP, then I can setup an account on a FTP server for you to upload it to.
I'll be out for the rest of the day, but lemme know!
#82
Originally posted by Ducky
Oh yea?... Im Deep in the bowels of the Applied Physics Lab... meaningless is especially true with all the crap going on here lateley... I could go on for hours... gotta love upper management....
... or not.
Oh yea?... Im Deep in the bowels of the Applied Physics Lab... meaningless is especially true with all the crap going on here lateley... I could go on for hours... gotta love upper management....
... or not.
#86
sounds like you guys had a blast! wish i could have been there, but i had a great time over in Idaho. nothin better than only spending $25 on a 600 mile round trip!
oh yeah i went on my own little trail ride up to tinkham on weds. heres some pics if you wanna see them....
http://community.webshots.com/user/kevywevy84
oh yeah i went on my own little trail ride up to tinkham on weds. heres some pics if you wanna see them....
http://community.webshots.com/user/kevywevy84
Last edited by KevyWevy; Nov 17, 2003 at 11:47 AM.
#89
Originally posted by Ducky
David,
Check your PM, I send you a pw and login to FTP to my site...
David,
Check your PM, I send you a pw and login to FTP to my site...
David... Do you need an FTP client? If so, grab WS_FTP (or WS_FTP LE at the bottom of the page) from here:
http://www.wsftp.com/downloads/index.html
#90
#93
#96
Originally posted by Ducky
Movies are up under Past Events near the bottom...
Movies are up under Past Events near the bottom...
#99
Its a Kodak DX....something or other, can't remember the exact model, but is 3.2 megapixels. Takes great pictures, but there's a pretty big reduction in quality with the video that it takes. Looks okay with a small screen, but if you try to blow it up, prepare for pixelation! Mike's digital video camera takes great video, I'm curious what he paid for it.
#100
Originally posted by IndieFIRE
hey david what kind of camra was that? how many mega pixals?
hey david what kind of camra was that? how many mega pixals?
One thing to keep in mind when shopping digital cameras is to know what your major intended use will be. If you're looking to paste up a bunch of shots to the 'net, then you don't need a gajillion pixels of resolution.
A 3.2megapixel camera will produce a raw image that's about 2400*1800 pixels in size, that's HUGE for posting to the net. As an example, all of my "big" pics are 800x600, or about 0.5megapixels; for example: http://www.midiwall.com/4Runner/dirt...Carbon_15.jpg. The point being that you're going to end up resizing them anyway...
Now, it's true that starting with a larger picture (more info) and then letting an app like Photoshop resize the image will give you better results, but there are practical limits.

If you're looking to print pictures, then a camera with 3.1mp's will give you great print pictures up to 8x10's. And, in this vein, the more pixels in the original image the better. But, I've gotten GREAT 4x6 print pictures on Kodak paper from my 2.1mp camera. fwiw, I use OFoto (http://www.ofoto.com).



