General Vehicle Related Topics (Non Year Related) If topic doesn't apply to Toyotas whatsoever, it should be in Off Topic
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

FJ60 or 1st gen 4Runner?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 29, 2008 | 02:20 PM
  #1  
cosmo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 109
Likes: 2
From: Longmont, CO
FJ60 or 1st gen 4Runner?

I have been considering buying either an FJ60 Land Cruiser or an 84-85 4Runner.

I know the LC has more torque and hp, but is also probably quite a bit heavier. Either way I want a solid axle. I have heard that the 2F/3F engines are bulletproof, but then again so is the 22R.

Which would you choose?
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2008 | 03:15 PM
  #2  
toy power's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
land cruiser!
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2008 | 03:31 PM
  #3  
4rnr's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
From: Plainfield, IL
Even the fj60 owners I know would rather have a mini. especially when it comes to wheeling the 60 is a fat, underpowered, heavy, trail clogger. Its beautiful though. The mini is lighter, cheaper, more reliable, more capable, larger aftermarket, more parts, more in junk yards...

I love land cruisers, but in my not so humble opinion, the FJ60/62 is the worst land cruiser, best looking, but most worthless by far!

BTW I own a fj62.
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2008 | 03:54 PM
  #4  
Belize Off Road Team's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,850
Likes: 1
From: Edmonton, Alberta
Land Cruiser is my vote
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2008 | 03:59 PM
  #5  
cosmo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 109
Likes: 2
From: Longmont, CO
what's the rev limit on the 2F? isn't it around 4500?

My dad took his carbed '85 22R up to 7600 once... scary.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2008 | 10:18 AM
  #6  
cosmo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 109
Likes: 2
From: Longmont, CO
no replies yet, so...


BUMP!!!
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2008 | 10:47 AM
  #7  
jct61765's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: Rindge, NH
Are you buying for a daily driver, with some offroad? If daily driver you have to look at the gas mileage.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2008 | 10:52 AM
  #8  
4Crawler's Avatar
Contributing Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,821
Likes: 34
From: SF Bay Area, CA
Probably would help to know your intended use and needs. 2 doors or 4? More bare bones or a more comfy interior? Keep it (near) stock or build it up? Probably have more build up options on the pickup/4Runner than the '60. I used to drive an FJ55 and now an '85 4Runner and the 4Runner is hands down better all around. Never driven a '60, but have a buddy who used to drive a 1st gen 4Runner and he swapped to a '60 when he hit first child got old enough to go wheeling and he had a 2nd one on the way. 2 doors just did not cut it with the family and he needed to carry more gear with the wife and kids. I think he now has an FJ80.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2008 | 11:09 AM
  #9  
JamesD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,074
Likes: 1
From: Binghamton, NY
Fj60 is what I would get. So much cooler than the 4Runner.

James
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2008 | 12:09 PM
  #10  
toyNG's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 648
Likes: 1
From: Redlands, CA
If it were me I'd go with the Land Cruiser. The 60 is such a beautiful rig! I really want one! As far as wheeling characteristics, I wouldn't know, as I've never wheeled one.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2008 | 06:22 PM
  #11  
MYFJ6O's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: PACIFIC NW WASHINGTON
4300

4300 is all mine will do with the 33sX10 tires on

Originally Posted by cosmo
what's the rev limit on the 2F? isn't it around 4500?

My dad took his carbed '85 22R up to 7600 once... scary.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2008 | 06:25 PM
  #12  
littlecommando's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
From: Powder Springs, GA
id go with the land cruiser, but thats just because its soo hard to find the other 2 you listed
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2008 | 06:43 PM
  #13  
duel's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
fj40 troop carrier!
or any of the other half a dozed fj40 variants.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 11:04 AM
  #14  
bigarms23's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 0
From: Kingman AZ
the land crusier has the bigger ring and pinion so i vote crusier but if you want a removale top than 4runner
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 12:57 PM
  #15  
tibbycruiser's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
I would go with the Landcruiser also, the 4 runner is not going to get much better gas mileage and feels so cheap and tinny compared to the LC.
I have had them both.
The LC is also very capable in stock form, throw an OME lift and a locker in the rear and you will be set.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2008 | 03:34 PM
  #16  
Diesel_Freak's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
From: PDX, Oregon
Runners hardly feel cheap and while they may be smaller, they're every bit as stout. I LOVE my 1st gen 4runner, but Personaly I wouldn't want a newer one. That's a personal preference thing, the newer gens are sweet, they're just not my style. I love how utilitarian the 1st genRunner/2nd gen trucks looks and everytime I get in my truck I imagine I'm back in Australia heading out into the bush. Comparitively, the 60 will haul more stuff, and IMO if swaped to some form of Diesel would make one awsome long haul but still very off road capable type rig.

It really comes down to what you want.

-The WB of a 1st Gen runner is about perfect and the size is a real asset out ohn the trail. They're smaller, yes, but they can still haul alot of stuff for their size, I'm always amazed at that'll fit back there. For a 2 Person expedition they're great. 3 people is doable, and 4+is a pain in the ass. That said, they'll haul 5 people out to wheel and back for a day trip thing.

-The 60 is bigger and as I said is more of a family hauler. They're really roomyu inside and are pretty dam comfortable cruising down the highway if they have some sound deadining added to them. They're really very capable trail rigs as well, but like a full size, their size can get them into trouble. Couse all that wheel base can also make them climb very very well.

Tough Call, and finding a 1st gen runner in really good shape is getting tougher by the year.

Hope to see a build one of these days.
Cheers

Dave
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2008 | 05:53 PM
  #17  
wardriver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: 26.3 road miles from the AT (VA)
I had a few FJ40's and a Trekker and now a 2nd gen 4runner- I would take and FJ back any day in a heartbeat...

Why did sell ALL of them again
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RedRunner_87
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
84
Jun 1, 2021 01:51 PM
mskalmus
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
9
May 28, 2017 07:51 AM
coryc85
Misc Stuff (Vehicle Related)
0
Jul 6, 2015 04:07 AM
HRDC0R19
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
3
Jul 5, 2015 06:43 PM
CJ94yota
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
2
Jul 3, 2015 10:14 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:20 PM.