Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

SAS with a drive flange? No hubs.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 4, 2017 | 05:30 PM
  #1  
gerth92's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 242
Likes: 23
From: Illinois
SAS with a drive flange? No hubs.

https://www.justdifferentials.com/TOY43421-60039-p/toy43421-60039.htm

For starters, I am building up a 1981 front axle for my 94 4runner. It had the lockouts stolen from it before it came to me. But that got me thinking, my fzj80 doesn't have lockouts and my 94 4runner doesn't have lockouts. If you are running an open front differential, why would you ever need to unlock the front hubs? My two current 4x4s don't. Can you not just use a 30 spline drive flange similar to the one in the link? Lock out hubs just seen like an unneeded extra point of failure. Has anyone seen or thought about this? Is there something about this that doesn't work?
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2017 | 06:37 PM
  #2  
millball's Avatar
Registered User
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 4,256
Likes: 681
From: Southern Arizona
There's no reason you can't do it.

All front end internals will turn all the time, as will the front driveshaft.

Early military jeeps were built like this.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2017 | 11:48 PM
  #3  
wyoming9's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 13,381
Likes: 100
From: I live in New Tripoli Pa out in the woods
Red face

The only downside is the constant running of the front axle parts .

If that is not going to be a issue go for it.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2017 | 05:16 PM
  #4  
gerth92's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 242
Likes: 23
From: Illinois
I am leaning towards it. The land cruiser is almost the exact same axle and it has spun for 230,000 miles. I'm sure a newly rebuilt axle can handle it. Worst that could happen is I have to unbolt the flange in an emergency.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2017 | 07:13 AM
  #5  
palmetto's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
I would just run hubs on the front unless this is a trail rig only. If theres no need to have all that spinning then why have all that spinning

Last edited by dropzone; Sep 7, 2017 at 04:44 PM. Reason: Censor picked up on language, keep it clean
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2017 | 07:25 AM
  #6  
RJR's Avatar
RJR
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,776
Likes: 110
From: Northern Colorado
It'll cost you a bit in gas mileage, maybe 5%, but other than that, there's no real downside. It's pretty much the same hardware as the rear drive line, and that spins all the time while you're driving the truck and no one gives that a second thought. Typical rear drive lines last at least 200,000 miles unless something goes wrong with the lubrication. There's validity to the argument that drive lines that are in continuous use last longer than ones that are used intermittently, because the wear surfaces stay coated in grease/oil and don't get rust spots from disuse and resultant oil film breakdown.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2017 | 09:39 AM
  #7  
palmetto's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by RJR
It'll cost you a bit in gas mileage, maybe 5%, but other than that, there's no real downside. It's pretty much the same hardware as the rear drive line, and that spins all the time while you're driving the truck and no one gives that a second thought. Typical rear drive lines last at least 200,000 miles unless something goes wrong with the lubrication. There's validity to the argument that drive lines that are in continuous use last longer than ones that are used intermittently, because the wear surfaces stay coated in grease/oil and don't get rust spots from disuse and resultant oil film breakdown.
so you assume hes not running a steer axle in the front?
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2017 | 04:45 PM
  #8  
dropzone's Avatar
Fossilized
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 19,771
Likes: 456
From: PNW
Originally Posted by palmetto
so you assume hes not running a steer axle in the front?
of course not, it's not a forklift..it's a comparison
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2017 | 03:58 AM
  #9  
palmetto's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by dropzone
of course not, it's not a forklift..it's a comparison
I just cant see where running flanges is a great idea on the street. I know the land crusiers use them but i cant see any advantage to them. Seems like the bad far outweighs the good. If you are too lazy to get out and lock hubs then you are too lazy to do a SAS in the first place.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2017 | 02:08 PM
  #10  
gerth92's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 242
Likes: 23
From: Illinois
Its also cost as well. Flanges are 100 for a pair. Good aisin hubs can be twice that. But with the gas use, it could take cost out of the comparison. And I don't mind locking the hubs every time. My pickup had them and it didn't bother me to lock them in for the day then unlock them when I remembered to. If it kills my gas mileage I might get hubs. I know my mileage will already be garbage with 4.88s.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:30 PM.