Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

Retrofitting Variable Valve Timing?

Old Aug 24, 2008 | 05:52 PM
  #1  
CoedNaked's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Retrofitting Variable Valve Timing?

For those of you who know anything about variable valve timing, do you think that there is potential to retrofit variable valve timing controllers on older engines? Perhaps this is just a dream I thought up the other day...but maybe worthy of discussion?

Here's something I stumbled accross recently (kind of interesting read I guess). http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?...6&DISPLAY=DESC

Edit: here's another interesting link: http://www.vvpower.com/

Last edited by CoedNaked; Aug 24, 2008 at 05:54 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 06:08 PM
  #2  
DeathCougar's Avatar
Donny, you're out of your element
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,692
Likes: 58
From: Marysville, WA
that second link kinda seems like the ol Helix power tower, know what I mean?

however, there isn't any way to put a VVT system in our 22R or 3VZ engines. you would have to completely change the cams so the gears were able to move, as in the VVT-I, VVTL-I, and VTEC systems.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 06:22 PM
  #3  
aviator's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 11,334
Likes: 0
From: COTKU,Ontario,Canada
Interesting stuff... from reading the first link it would seem to be posible with their system but it sounds very involved and complex, you might be better off just to buy an engine with VVT and install it.

The second link http://www.vvpower.com/ seems to use a much simpler solution but I would be concerned about the durability of the valve within the valve set up, the motor trend article link is interesting though, it might be worth more research.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 06:24 PM
  #4  
aviator's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 11,334
Likes: 0
From: COTKU,Ontario,Canada
Originally Posted by DeathCougar
that second link kinda seems like the ol Helix power tower, know what I mean?

however, there isn't any way to put a VVT system in our 22R or 3VZ engines. you would have to completely change the cams so the gears were able to move, as in the VVT-I, VVTL-I, and VTEC systems.
I agree with your first point cougar but it might warrent more research.
as for the second point when you get to the bottom of the patent app. notice thingy they actually say that the heads would need reworking and install of a new cam system.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 06:37 PM
  #5  
Mic09dcsm's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 620
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio
That is sooooo impractical, even with VVT-i our engines (the V6) would still suck, single overhead cam per bank and 2 valves per cylinder, no sir.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 06:44 PM
  #6  
DeathCougar's Avatar
Donny, you're out of your element
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,692
Likes: 58
From: Marysville, WA
Originally Posted by aviator
I agree with your first point cougar but it might warrent more research.
as for the second point when you get to the bottom of the patent app. notice thingy they actually say that the heads would need reworking and install of a new cam system.
Yea, i know that part. I think he is thinking more of an easy bolt in application. There really isn't any practical reason to install VVT-i in our trucks. For the amount of money you would spend, you could have a 1GR WITH VVT-i already installed.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 07:18 PM
  #7  
abecedarian's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,723
Likes: 6
From: Temecula Valley, CA
it'd probably be easier to implement a centrifugal force based system that would simply advance or retard the cam timing based on engine rpm- advance the cam at idle and retard it at speed in order to move the powerband higher as rpms increase.
perhaps a fluid based system could be incorporated with an intermediate follower between the cam and valve that could also vary lift to some degree.
hmm... hydraulically adjustable rockers....
wouldn't be much different in operation than a diesel injection pump....

*the above idea and suggestions are hereby copyrighted by me upon publication on the Internet....
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 08:13 PM
  #8  
seaofnames's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: Burnaby, BC
Originally Posted by Mic09dcsm
That is sooooo impractical, even with VVT-i our engines (the V6) would still suck, single overhead cam per bank and 2 valves per cylinder, no sir.
This is the best reply yet!

No point in trying to stuff more air in an already restricted and limited valve train.

It could be worth it on the 5vz, but I'd rather just swap the lexus 4.0L V8 in my runner than mess with the heads/computer that much.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 08:14 PM
  #9  
just a 22re's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,801
Likes: 2
From: milwaukee, WI baby muddin in the streets!!
i think its a very good idea, I also had a dream of making an all coil style head witch means theres no oil no coolant or anything to go in the head and here then you would be able to flick a switch and go from lots ol power to eco and then stock for smog things but i dont know just an idea i had a long time ago that i still didnt make into working state but i did make one a long time ago lots fo work!!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bigjstang
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
21
Jun 2, 2025 03:56 PM
RedRunner_87
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
84
Jun 1, 2021 01:51 PM
smiley52
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
8
Jul 11, 2015 05:16 AM
Gamble_STi
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
2
Jul 7, 2015 07:54 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:43 PM.