Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DashLynx

Mounting Shocks Outside of the Frame

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-11-2018, 07:58 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Jeremyks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mounting Shocks Outside of the Frame

Has anybody mounted shocks outside of frame on a Toyota pickup? Was thinking this would allow me to mount longer shocks without moving the gas tank. Keep in mind Im running a flatbed on this pickup.

Any advice, will it work?
Old 03-11-2018, 08:12 AM
  #2  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
muddpigg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Enterprise, AL
Posts: 4,374
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts
Would think it would interfere when axle flexs. I put spacers on the rear wheels to prevent tires from rubbing frame rails on IFS backspacing and 12.5 width tires. If your a flat bed your options are much more than us 4rnr guys. I repositioned my shocks /\ and didn't need to move tank.
Old 03-11-2018, 08:49 AM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Jeremyks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I should probably give a little more background on this pickup. I'm running a JD Fab LT front end with King Coil Overs. In the rear it currently stock besides +3 spacers to match the front width. Plans are to put Chevy 63 Leafs in the back and I'm hoping I will have enough to run a fox or king smooth body shock in the rear.
Old 03-11-2018, 09:16 AM
  #4  
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
muddpigg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Enterprise, AL
Posts: 4,374
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts
My experience with leaf springs is it is hard to get full range of flex on a mock up as compared to a link set up. It may clear or maybe not as axle travels. Assuming your looking to go fast over rough terrain the best config for shocks is straight up and down vrs having them angled. With a flat bed you can make or use (trailgear) a frame to allow this style of mounting. Of course you'll want shocks not to limit axle travel. If losing surface area on flat bed is not an option I'd consider the /\ configuration. The stock shock config of one forward and one aft will limit travel of axle as the mount points will bind on full droop.

The rear axle will flex on an radius ( ) thats when my tires would rub frame. Wasn't an issue when on road normal driving but became on when flexing at full stuff offroad.
Old 03-11-2018, 01:22 PM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Jeremyks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here's a pic of the flatbed. I know straight up would be best but I was thinking to angle forward towards the tool box on the bed to tie it in to make it look ok and utilize my bed space better.
Attached Thumbnails Mounting Shocks Outside of the Frame-img_6291.jpg  
Old 03-11-2018, 05:14 PM
  #6  
Fossilized
Staff
iTrader: (6)
 
dropzone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: PNW
Posts: 19,771
Received 448 Likes on 293 Posts
Originally Posted by Jeremyks
I should probably give a little more background on this pickup. I'm running a JD Fab LT front end with King Coil Overs. In the rear it currently stock besides +3 spacers to match the front width. Plans are to put Chevy 63 Leafs in the back and I'm hoping I will have enough to run a fox or king smooth body shock in the rear.
have you considered a T100 axle?
3" spaces put a lot of strain on components and it looks like you have already added a heavy ass bed to the truck...
Eliminating the spacers would help eliminate a point of fail
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
joecan
Newbie Tech Section
21
12-12-2011 12:05 PM
nix4x4
General Vehicle Related Topics (Non Year Related)
10
02-22-2008 10:53 AM
mrnick1979
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
4
10-13-2007 01:16 PM
ShortyzKustomz
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
2
03-03-2007 03:05 PM



Quick Reply: Mounting Shocks Outside of the Frame



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:49 AM.