Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

gearing and tire size...

Old Dec 8, 2008 | 08:09 PM
  #1  
rangerruck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
gearing and tire size...

I am still confused while reading some other past threads.
Am I right in thinking that the higher the number is on your rear gearing, you should get higher mpgs? and if you do have higher gearing, say above 4:3 , you can add on taller tires and still get better gas mileage? If you add taller tires to the 4:3 or smaller ratios, does this hurt gas mileage?
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2008 | 08:26 PM
  #2  
tc's Avatar
tc
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,875
Likes: 3
From: Longmont, CO
A higher number on the gear ratio is a LOWER gear. If you add larger tires, you need lower gears (higher numerically) to keep the RPM's in the right range to balance power and efficiency.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2008 | 10:09 PM
  #3  
Matt16's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,377
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by rangerruck
I am still confused while reading some other past threads.
Am I right in thinking that the higher the number is on your rear gearing, you should get higher mpgs? and if you do have higher gearing, say above 4:3 , you can add on taller tires and still get better gas mileage? If you add taller tires to the 4:3 or smaller ratios, does this hurt gas mileage?
Your mpg-ratio correlation is correct. Toyotas of this era like to rev and don't like to be lugged. Throttle position determines mpg.

Like on your bike as a kid, Low gears (1st, 2nd etc) are numerically high (3:1, 2.5:1), whereas high gear (4th, 5th) are numerically low 1.2:1, 0.9:1).
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 07:13 PM
  #4  
RatLabGuy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Matt16
Your mpg-ratio correlation is correct. Toyotas of this era like to rev and don't like to be lugged. Throttle position determines mpg.

Like on your bike as a kid, Low gears (1st, 2nd etc) are numerically high (3:1, 2.5:1), whereas high gear (4th, 5th) are numerically low 1.2:1, 0.9:1).
This is all correct, they do seem to like higher RPMs.
However, you have to keep in mind that the odometer is based off of the transmission gearing, and it dosn't "know" that the differential gears have changed.
So if you were to change gears, but not tire size, then the odometer wil lread incorrectly and provide misleading MPGs.
For example, change from 4.10 to 4.88 = ~20%. *assuming tires do't change*, odo reads 300 mi... it's off by 20%, actual mileage is only ~240.
That said, even w/ accounting for the "math error", actual MPGs seem to be better (in my own experience at least) with the overal gear-to-tire ratio higher than stock (higher overall RPMs).

i'm now running 5.29s on an A/T 4Runner (orig 4.30) w/ only 32s, and MPGs better than ever.

Last edited by RatLabGuy; Dec 9, 2008 at 07:15 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 07:21 PM
  #5  
Matt16's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,377
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by RatLabGuy
This is all correct, they do seem to like higher RPMs.
However, you have to keep in mind that the odometer is based off of the transmission gearing, and it dosn't "know" that the differential gears have changed.
So if you were to change gears, but not tire size, then the odometer wil lread incorrectly and provide misleading MPGs.
For example, change from 4.10 to 4.88 = ~20%. *assuming tires do't change*, odo reads 300 mi... it's off by 20%, actual mileage is only ~240.
That said, even w/ accounting for the "math error", actual MPGs seem to be better (in my own experience at least) with the overal gear-to-tire ratio higher than stock (higher overall RPMs).

i'm now running 5.29s on an A/T 4Runner (orig 4.30) w/ only 32s, and MPGs better than ever.
Its a pretty easy calculation than is easily done in your head at the pump when comparing mpg. TC likes to point out that the speedo/ odo is wildly inaccurate, and that GPS is a better way of telling distance and speed.

Last edited by Matt16; Dec 9, 2008 at 07:23 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 07:46 PM
  #6  
tc's Avatar
tc
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,875
Likes: 3
From: Longmont, CO
In my experience they have been. The ONLY reason to do the conversion is to compare your mileage before/after.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 07:48 PM
  #7  
Matt16's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,377
Likes: 5
I knew it. lol

Last edited by Matt16; Dec 9, 2008 at 07:50 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 10:16 PM
  #8  
Jay351's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,055
Likes: 10
From: maple ridge, British Columbia, Canada
Acording to the "your speed" thingy on the hwy, My speedo is about 2-3km/h faster...
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 10:55 PM
  #9  
Matt16's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 5,377
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by Jay351
Acording to the "your speed" thingy on the hwy, My speedo is about 2-3km/h faster...
My speedo is 12km/h (~7mph) faster. I moved the needle so that way people I let borrow the truck drive slower and I am reminded to slow down. Initially I was trying to compensate for 4.10s and 31s, then I regeared.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 11:03 PM
  #10  
Jay351's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,055
Likes: 10
From: maple ridge, British Columbia, Canada
Maybe I should do the same, trick myself into thinking my truck is faster
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 11:29 PM
  #11  
thook's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,656
Likes: 16
From: NW Ark on wooded ten acres...Ozarks at large!
It'll never work. Yer just not that dumb....

MPG's is also determined in part by RPM's. The signals the distributor sends to the ECU based on revolutions of the crank/cam sychronization determines injector pulse. The higher the frequency of injector pulse (in conjunction with spark frequency), the more fuel you are, of course, using. So, it's not just throttle position. You could have a slightly opened throttle yet be revving high in the RPM's (gearing comes into play here) and still be gobbling the gas.

Just an FYI. You may commence with the throwing of beer cans in my general direction....
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 02:00 AM
  #12  
abecedarian's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,723
Likes: 6
From: Temecula Valley, CA
considering civilian GPS coordinates are accurate to within 30 feet, give or take, a run starting at A,B and ending at X,Y is at most off 60 feet.
leaving you with only the inaccuracy of exactly how much fuel was in the tank and exactly how much was left when you were done....
even using the automatic pump shut off can be off up to a gallon.

sheesh. be happy with a 10% margin for error.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 09:49 AM
  #13  
tc's Avatar
tc
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,875
Likes: 3
From: Longmont, CO
Sure, it's not just throttle position, but one step in gears or tire size results in about a 200 RPM difference, making the mileage AT MOST 10% different, (or about 2MPG) but it's not really.

Compare that to the difference in fueling rate between barely on the gas when you're in the powerband and flat to the floor when you're not, and that is 100's of % difference!
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 12:41 PM
  #14  
thook's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,656
Likes: 16
From: NW Ark on wooded ten acres...Ozarks at large!
Probably why TPS adjustment is critical to proper timing, eh?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
XtraCab
Solid Axle Swaps, All Years
18
Apr 12, 2020 05:25 AM
coffey50
Offroad Tech
17
Jul 28, 2015 10:55 AM
justdifferentials
Just Differentials
0
Jul 22, 2015 08:26 PM
PlayAwhile
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
5
Jul 20, 2015 11:36 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:30 AM.