Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

Engine Swap vs 3.0 Engine Rebuild

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 7, 2014 | 09:52 PM
  #1  
spaceycayce's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Engine Swap vs 3.0 Engine Rebuild

Hi All....I know I haven't posted in a long while, I've been busy with other life duties.

Anyway, It's time to feed the beast.

Tl;DR: I want to do either a swap or engine upgrade. What would you do, what is your take on both and why or why not.

I have a 95 with a SAS, 35's, Winch, custom Flowmaster 40 and cat back exhaust, however the problem is the cat got stolen so I had to put in a Califonia legal one due to insurance reasons. That being said I'm not adverse to registering it TRAIL ONLY, if i need to do this to pass smog. Smog is the least of my concerns. There was no recall on the 3vze per the dealer as it was one of the last built by Toyota.

That being said, I've researched a good bit and found out a good bit of information, but have lots of questions. I work in IT and that is where my strengths are currently. But most of my staff are gear heads and know their stuff. I have access to many resources so that is why I want costs for a "friend" mechanic and say a normal one. I also want to know parts costs, time, headaches, etc.

I just want opinions and use you all as a sounding board. I appreciate any and all help in the past, now and future. Here goes:

Option A. Engine Swap- Domestic, Toyota/Lexus/ Diesel
Vs.
Option B. Rebuild with the following: Wiesco or JE Pistons
Micropolish the crank
Blueprint balance
Port and polish head
5 angle valve job
Extrude honed intake manifold
Throttle body upgrade
Headers
xpipe
1 injector upgrade –stock using 7mge or 1 UZ
Reply
Old May 9, 2014 | 04:40 PM
  #2  
james92toy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
ENGINE SWAP!!
I have to admit i am a 3.0 hater. So i think anything would be better.
Heres mine. 1994 gm 4.3 , l460e
It will cost more, take longer than you think to do a swap.
For me the pro's. Super easy to work on , parts are every where , parts are cheap, 195 hp stock. Great power and drivability . Fits like a stock motor. Cal smog legal.
The con's. Bad gas milage 13mpg average around town 16 mpg freeway. Which is about what my 3.0 was getting.
Would i do again , hell yes. My 4runner is a 92 obd1 smog . I wanted to stay obd1 because its a little easer to pass. If i was to do again i would think about the toy 3.4 a little more, swap is easer . Also i wanted an auto and the gm 4.3 works very well with an auto. I don't think i would ever want to wheel/drive stick again.
Name:  DSC00448.jpg
Views: 885
Size:  363.0 KBName:  43almostdone013.jpg
Views: 851
Size:  213.7 KBName:  radiatorhose001.jpg
Views: 804
Size:  90.1 KBName:  IMG_1285_zpsbdbe2e4a.jpg
Views: 776
Size:  115.2 KB

Last edited by james92toy; May 10, 2014 at 10:31 AM.
Reply
Old May 9, 2014 | 05:03 PM
  #3  
JasonYota's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,121
Likes: 1
From: Mobile, Alabama
I vote engine swap also.
I've read and seen too many people that dump money into a 3.0 to have them fail again.
You didn't state if you had manual trans or auto trans.
You need to pick an engine that fits your power needs
Reply
Old May 11, 2014 | 07:28 PM
  #4  
coopster's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 695
Likes: 103
From: exo-reality -wave if you see me; Front Range, CO
Yeah, I'd go swap. And if you want to toss performance $$ at something, you're further ahead. (Started a 3.slow rebuild, got bad machine work done; stalled out, its an anchor now. Looking for a 3.4 probably now; although watching some of these 4.7 swaps on here too.. My tundra's a 4.7; pretty sweet).
Reply
Old May 12, 2014 | 04:31 PM
  #5  
donomite49's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,463
Likes: 4
From: monroe nc
can't go wrong with a 3.4 imo...

i get between 14 city and 20 hwy depending on how hard i drive it.

haven't really tried to max out the hwy miles though, if i drove 60-65 mph i probably be in the low to mid twenties.
driving a 3.4 is awesome, compared to the 22re i had.
Reply
Old May 12, 2014 | 06:37 PM
  #6  
james92toy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
I don't doubt the 3.4 is little more efficient . But my milage is in a lifted rig with 35' tires , fj 60 axles , full roll cage , winch ..... Weighted in at 5000 pounds unloaded. Ive heard a 3.4 in a similar rig gets close to the same maybe 1 or 2 mpg better .
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Goddamnboh
3.4 Swaps
12
May 11, 2016 09:22 PM
God's Bounty Hunter
Pre 84 Trucks
6
Jul 8, 2015 12:54 PM
Vargntucson
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
0
Jul 4, 2015 12:15 PM
Alex Bessinger
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
4
Jun 28, 2015 10:05 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:23 PM.