Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

Catalytic removal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 28, 2006 | 04:13 AM
  #1  
psychobillyman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, WI
Catalytic removal

Hi,
I’ve got a quick question. I’ve got a 1988 4runner and think my cat might be plugged up, so I was just curious if I could just remove it. I have never removed a cat from an EFI engine; I figure it should be fine, just wanted to know for sure.


Thanks,
Jake
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2006 | 04:16 AM
  #2  
AH64ID's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,655
Likes: 0
From: Idaho
Yes you can, but you will find (search and see) that most people dont like their cats gone. I did mine and all it did was stink, horribly. IMO get a carsound (magnaflow) replacment...

but to answer your original question, it wont affect your EFI at all.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2006 | 06:01 AM
  #3  
brandontrek's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 0
From: Miami FL
running a straight pipe is just annoying...i think you get a much better sound and smell out of a magnaflow highflow. if your in the market hit up cootees with a pm. he hooked me up with one in 2 days....
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2006 | 06:49 AM
  #4  
trythis's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City
Please don't run without a converter. That stuff up there , in the air that causes athsma, etc. (smog) is caused by the crap coming out of YOUR (and my) exhaust. Running without a catalytic converter is like driving 20 cars from the 1970s. We all make polution, why add to it unecessarily. That whole tread lightly bit includes the air.
Sorry for the rant, but there it is.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2006 | 06:53 AM
  #5  
Churnd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,087
Likes: 1
From: Hattiesburg, MS
It affected mine. I suspect it caused the 02 sensor to report faulty readings, therefore causing my idle to fluctuate between normal and lower than normal. Sometimes I thought the engine was gonna die. I put a Carsound cat on, and it fixed the idle issue, and I noticed no performance loss from it. I actually gained some low end torque without sacrificing high end HP.

Plus, it's horrible for the environment. Don't hack it off.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2006 | 06:57 AM
  #6  
Bumpin' Yota's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,689
Likes: 4
From: Sarasota, FL
Originally Posted by Churnd
It affected mine. I suspect it caused the 02 sensor to report faulty readings, therefore causing my idle to fluctuate between normal and lower than normal. Sometimes I thought the engine was gonna die. I put a Carsound cat on, and it fixed the idle issue, and I noticed no performance loss from it. I actually gained some low end torque without sacrificing high end HP.

Plus, it's horrible for the environment. Don't hack it off.
Well the O2 sensor is actually upstream of the cat so it shouldnt alter the readings of it... Im willing to bet the idle issues were propagated by the lack of backpressure, turning up the idle probably would have helped. But I agree on a NA gasser id leave the cats. Now a turbocharged application would be a whole different ballgame!
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2006 | 07:02 AM
  #7  
Churnd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,087
Likes: 1
From: Hattiesburg, MS
Originally Posted by Bumpin' Yota
Well the O2 sensor is actually upstream of the cat so it shouldnt alter the readings of it...
Right, but it's pretty close and takes a 360* reading, so I'm sure the lack of backpressure (read, exhaust gas) had some effect on it's reading.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2006 | 07:15 AM
  #8  
DirtCheap's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 102
Likes: 1
From: S.F Bay Area, Currently in TX
No, it does not affect the O2 sensor.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2006 | 07:48 AM
  #9  
whitetaco02's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
where can i get a carsound cat at? I am very interested and what kind of price am i looking at?
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2006 | 08:02 AM
  #10  
DirtCheap's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 102
Likes: 1
From: S.F Bay Area, Currently in TX
You can buy a comparable replacement cat at any local muffler shop, ie.. Midas, Mieneke, etc. The O2 sensor is not in the loop at idle.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2006 | 08:23 AM
  #11  
maxpower_hd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
I bought a chepo cat at advanced auto for about $99. It was a direct fit and works fine. I could not pass inspection with my old one ewven though it still performed fine.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2006 | 09:03 AM
  #12  
Tdubbs05's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 341
Likes: 3
From: Los Altos, CA (Flagstaff, AZ for college)
i don't mean to be liberal ( b/c i sure as hell am not) but i'd have to agree that its time to actually start thinking about pollution control. after living in the bay area, ca for the past 19 yrs, the smog has definitely gotten more and more noticable. before now i always thought it was such trash how ca smogs cars, but now i realize it's a good thing...
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2006 | 10:30 AM
  #13  
Elton's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 12,261
Likes: 7
From: Siletz,Oregon
Carsound 14'' $62 shiped Carsound 16'' $67 shiped .... i took off my cat on my 22re and it didint do nothing but make it a little louder plus you can get a ticket for not haveing one

Last edited by Elton; Jul 28, 2006 at 04:09 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2006 | 10:35 AM
  #14  
X-AWDriver's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,549
Likes: 0
From: Littleton,CO
I ran my turbo Eclipse cat-free for performance reasons but on a NA engine the gains are so insignificant it's not worth the trouble of adding pollution;my Eclipse also only saw about 5000 miles a year and was primarily a track car.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2006 | 02:04 PM
  #15  
tampabayota's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 460
Likes: 1
From: TAMPA BAY
so you shouldnt run without a cat on a turbo?
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2006 | 02:06 PM
  #16  
Churnd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,087
Likes: 1
From: Hattiesburg, MS
Originally Posted by tom renzoni
so you shouldnt run without a cat on a turbo?
Shouldn't run without a cat on a fuel injected engine period.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2006 | 02:27 PM
  #17  
Bumpin' Yota's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,689
Likes: 4
From: Sarasota, FL
Originally Posted by tom renzoni
so you shouldnt run without a cat on a turbo?
Technically and legally you have to have a cat.

But with a turbo you cannot reduce backpressure post turbine enough! Lowering backpressure behind that turbine severely lowers EGTs which help save yer engine. If I do turbo my yota ill be pulling the cat or getting a huge arse cat that will provide zero restriction. Until then im keeping my carsound Hi Flow cat!
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2006 | 03:40 PM
  #18  
rimpainter.com's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,916
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Bumpin' Yota
Well the O2 sensor is actually upstream of the cat so it shouldnt alter the readings of it...
That's true, but information needs to be added. The 5VZ has two sensors; one before the cat, and one after. Chris' idle probably got jacked up because the second "sniffer" saw much lower EGT's, therefore the signal back to the ECU was whacked out (my theory anyway).

I agree with others, it is best to run a cat on a daily-driven vehicle. Carsound is the way to go.

Last edited by rimpainter.com; Jul 28, 2006 at 03:42 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LotOMiles
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
8
Sep 14, 2015 11:45 PM
Rickstwowheels
Newbie Tech Section
6
Sep 9, 2015 06:12 PM
FJtoyman
Engines - Transmissions
2
Sep 8, 2015 04:47 AM
gp66
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
5
Sep 7, 2015 08:29 AM
AkitaDog
Vehicles - Trailers (Complete)
0
Sep 3, 2015 09:01 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:20 AM.