Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DashLynx

The 3.0 Hypothesis - if you've had a headgasket fail, read...if you have headers too

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-2007, 05:24 AM
  #41  
Contributing Member
 
mt_goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oklahoma State
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by TNRabbit
"Do a retorque after full warmup."

Who the eff is going to pull everything off their 3.0 to re-torque the heads after the first warm up???

That would be a gigantic PITA.
Maybe that's why he now just says follow the FSM.

Originally Posted by TNRabbit

How 'bout it, Ted? Some clarification?
He did say this:
Yes, time consuming, but much faster and less costly than another set of gaskets
Old 04-05-2007, 05:29 AM
  #42  
Contributing Member
 
mt_goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oklahoma State
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
That is probably a lot easier to do with the 22re too.
Old 04-05-2007, 05:35 AM
  #43  
Contributing Member
 
mt_goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oklahoma State
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Bumpin' Yota

Mt - does the 1/4 of 100% refer to the 33ftlbs?
I can't remember now, it was May 2004 when I saved that. Best to ask EB for sure.
Old 04-05-2007, 06:56 AM
  #44  
Contributing Member
 
TNRabbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: TENN Native Languishing in Virginia
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Bumpin' Yota
TNR - hahahaha I was thinking that myself. (26scfm@90psi...grrrrr!! lol) But Ill bet you after 500 or 1000 miles you'll probably need to check the valve shim clearnaces and that would be a perfect time to retorque. I know my compression is all over the place and ive got a very loud tick in the top end so I definately need to check my clearances....

Mt - does the 1/4 of 100% refer to the 33ftlbs?
26 CFM@90psi!! WOO HOO!! (twisting the knife...grrrr back atcha)

I think that meant 1/4 turn every time you reach a yield point (so that would be 3 backoffs total...?)


BUMPIN: Have you stethoscoped your tick yet?

Last edited by TNRabbit; 04-05-2007 at 06:58 AM.
Old 04-05-2007, 07:58 AM
  #45  
Registered User
 
elripster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Plainfield, IL
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Reusing a TTY bolt will typically result in higher clamping force on the gasket although like not as uniform as before yield.

The effect of stretching the bolt strain hardens it. It still has elastic properties, but it sort has a higher spring rate. You re-torque and again enter yield, you might be putting more clamping force on the head depending on the method. If all the FMS says to do is torque to a certain value, then the force is the same. If it is like the process used on, for example, older Mercedes 5 cyl diesels, you torque like 120ft-lb then turn each bolt one full revolution. In the latter case you would be putting more force on the heads.

As the gasket, threads, etc... settling, there harder bolt will not have as much distance over its range of tensions to relax while maintaining tension.

The bolts will anneal to some degree on the head so it is possible the effects of strain hardening are negated over time.

Frank
Old 04-05-2007, 08:32 AM
  #46  
Registered User
 
Bumpin' Yota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Sarasota, FL
Posts: 3,689
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by TNRabbit
26 CFM@90psi!! WOO HOO!! (twisting the knife...grrrr back atcha)

I think that meant 1/4 turn every time you reach a yield point (so that would be 3 backoffs total...?)


BUMPIN: Have you stethoscoped your tick yet?
Nope not yet, hmmmmm that would be a good tool investment! An automotive stethoscope! *runs out the door headed to Harbour Freight or Sears*
Old 04-05-2007, 09:15 AM
  #47  
Contributing Member
 
TNRabbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: TENN Native Languishing in Virginia
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 14 Posts
Here ya go, Bump:

http://www.northerntool.com/webapp/w..._385487_385487
Old 04-05-2007, 07:00 PM
  #48  
Registered User
 
Bumpin' Yota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Sarasota, FL
Posts: 3,689
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
ooooooh tooooools!! *runs to the freezer to get Credit Card out of gigantic block of ice*
Old 09-30-2007, 08:46 PM
  #49  
Registered User
 
Mr_Martinez1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bay Area CA
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by toyota_mdt_tech
You are dead on! The abolishion of asbestos created lots of headgasket issues for other makers also. The 1988 3.0 and 89 and mid way throough 90 used asbestos, we had zero problems with these (keep in mind, a failure rate of about 7% in 100K miles was considered normal, headgasket is kinda like a normal wearing item). The worst gaskets were design 1 from late 1990 to 1993. In 1994, it was improved and 95, final design gasket was used) They have a print seal which was facing upward which made the gasket stick to the aluminum, and float on the iron as it expanded. Well, the aluminum expanded at a greater rate, design 2, same deal, but more reinforcement. Design 3, print seal was moved on the block side of the gasket, and even more reinforcement added which was bascially more steel and the head was allowed to float eliminating deformed gaskets. As for the 3.4, they did use a composition gasket, but around 99, they went to a laminated all steel gasket with a coating to allow slippage, but no gasket distortion. Problem solved.
So i finally blew a headgasket 150k, ive decided to do it myself. Toyota did the "first" (which if i wouldve known all they were doin was a HG, i wouldve waited till it actually needed it) back at like 60k maybe less. ANyway, its a 92 4x4 p/u im goin to have the heads pressure checked (even though i can see the HG failure @#6, jus wanna make sure) a resurface, valve job, an if can find a decent price, a lil port matchin and Headers/exh system, timing, W/P while i have it apart, the works. WHat id like to know is what material or manufacturer should i be getting the gaskets from? or do i need to quit being cheap an go directly to the stealership?
Old 10-01-2007, 03:55 AM
  #50  
Contributing Member
 
TNRabbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: TENN Native Languishing in Virginia
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 14 Posts
Buy from www.engnbldr.com
Old 10-01-2007, 06:36 AM
  #51  
Registered User
 
intense's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
While we're on the subject:
Are there any aftermarket head gaskets people have tried? Were they better or worse than the OEM gaskets?

I'm gonna be taking my 4Runner offline over the winter and do a whole slew of maintenance items...with 280K on the clock (and not knowing the prior history), I think it's about time
Old 10-01-2007, 07:59 PM
  #52  
Registered User
 
toyota_mdt_tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: WA
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Mr_Martinez1982
...quit being cheap an go directly to the stealership?
Catch a lot more flies with honey then you will with vinegar.
Old 10-11-2007, 06:41 PM
  #53  
Registered User
 
mrnick1979's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if i use a mls head gasket when i do a engine rebuild on a 3.0 should that take care of the head gasket worries? or is there another better gasket?
Old 10-12-2007, 07:20 AM
  #54  
Registered User
 
n4ynu1010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Richmond , Va / Henrico Co.
Posts: 1,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Head Gasket Re-Torque

Well which would you rather do ................ Re-Torque or Replace again down the road due to not re-torqing .............It has always been a required step in every engine I have put together to re-torque after bringing up to operating Temp and letting completely cool down and generally almost every bolt needs a adj. according to calibrated torque wrench ..................................The Choice Is Yours .
Old 10-13-2007, 05:12 AM
  #55  
Registered User
 
corvey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I just got done putting mine back to together a couple of days ago and I used MLS gaskets on my 3.0. So far so good
Old 12-29-2008, 03:19 PM
  #56  
Registered User
 
1TuffSR5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
**thread resurrect**so it still has not been answered as to whether or not those who've done HG's and then installed headers have had to do HG's after having installed headers....
Old 12-04-2010, 06:39 AM
  #57  
Registered User
 
White4Runner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Any problems using MLS head gaskets after a couple of years? LC Engineering sells an MLS head gasket and new head bolts. They claim this solves the head gasket issues. Are they telling the truth?
Old 12-04-2010, 07:51 AM
  #58  
Contributing Member
 
mt_goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Oklahoma State
Posts: 10,666
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Be aware that there are stricter surface smoothness requirements (for head and block) with MLS gaskets.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alimant100
93-98 T100s
4
01-20-2016 05:58 PM
clok
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
1
08-01-2015 09:42 PM
defrag4
Vehicles - Trailers (Complete)
0
07-31-2015 10:50 AM
toofly1999
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
8
07-25-2015 07:09 PM
Coreyr384
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
2
07-10-2015 11:13 AM



Quick Reply: The 3.0 Hypothesis - if you've had a headgasket fail, read...if you have headers too



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:12 AM.