Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

1st hand input on exhaust size?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 15, 2011 | 06:30 AM
  #1  
fierohink's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,437
Likes: 96
From: Frederick, MD
1st hand input on exhaust size?

I currently have a stock manifold and cat with a custom 2" SS exhaust through a cherry bomb style muffler and out behind the rear wheel on a 22re.

This is for those with 2.25" and 2.5" exhuasts: When you upgraded from stock did you notice a bigg improvement in larger pipe size? Or do you think 2" is fine and a header is really where the improvement comes from?
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2011 | 06:57 AM
  #2  
xxxtreme22r's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 13,574
Likes: 72
From: Wilkes-Barre, PA, USA
Exhaust size is gonna depend on where you want your torque gain to be.

2" will geared towards lower RPMs where 2.25" will gain torque in a higher RPM range and 2.5" will be in even higher RPM ranges.

I have a 2.25" from a header back, no cat through a thrush turbo. And like it for the most part. Since the truck came with the header, I cannot speak as to factory manifold versus header.

But I do know the factory manifold is a 4 - 2 - 1 style, where most other headers are 4 - 1 style, except the TRD/Thorley, and I believe NWOR ???? has a 4 - 2 - 1 header as well.

With a 4 - 2 - 1 header the torque gain is gonna be in the lower RPMs compared to a 4 - 1 header.

Although gains throughout the entire RPM will be seen, just will be more noticeable in certain RPM ranges based on what size exhaust pipe and type of exhaust manifld/header is used.

This also all depends on air intake as well. Which will further the improvement of an exhaust size change.

IMO, changing exhaust size shouldn't be done until you get at least a better air flow though the motor. Whether it be a deckplate mod, CAI, or just a K&N drop in filter.

Too large of an exhaust size for the setup can also cause a loss in some cases. Ie, you don't want to run a 3" exhaust on a normally aspirated 4cyl or even a factory boost 22rte.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2011 | 07:15 AM
  #3  
fierohink's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,437
Likes: 96
From: Frederick, MD
I feel like I've made imprvements on the intake side, I'm not running a bigger afm, yet, but I have a k&n and deckplate. And there was a noticeable improvement in throttl response and launch with those.

I know my 2" is bigger than stock (1.75"?) an wasn't sure if it would be worth while to go 2.25 or 2.5" or just leave it.?
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2011 | 08:33 AM
  #4  
peow130's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,887
Likes: 16
From: Spokane, WA
Probably not. Like said, the 2" will give better low end as opposed to the others.
2.25 does sound good, though.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Team420
Early Land Cruisers
1
Dec 30, 2015 01:31 PM
justdifferentials
Just Differentials
1
Aug 15, 2015 05:25 PM
coffey50
Offroad Tech
17
Jul 28, 2015 10:55 AM
Gravel Maker
RuffStuff
1
Jul 27, 2015 06:53 PM
TDonkey
93-98 T100s
0
Jul 26, 2015 10:14 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:02 PM.