237,750 mile timing belt
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: ga
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
237,750 mile timing belt
what i mean is 237500
this is what my belt looked like when i just changed it. no as bad as i thought, have seen worse from my 944.
this is what my belt looked like when i just changed it. no as bad as i thought, have seen worse from my 944.
Last edited by instigator; 04-19-2008 at 11:54 AM.
#6
those are thicker belts they use on the 3.0 and 3.4. they can go along time! now the thinner belt on my 92 camry 5sfe 2.2 would never go that long! mike
Trending Topics
#9
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The waterpump chrip is independent from the belt. Could have replaced the waterpump and kept the original belt!
I know I am going to keep the old ones I take off my truck for spares for whenever something crazy happens...belts are belts...
I know I am going to keep the old ones I take off my truck for spares for whenever something crazy happens...belts are belts...
#10
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
belts are belts and they are cheap and readily available i wouldn't hang on to the old ones. Even when they are off the vehicle they are going to continue to age and dry rot.
#13
Contributing Member
#18
Contributing Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Chadds Ford, PA
Posts: 1,744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Us 3.4l Owners are lucky that the engine is non-interference.
I would still change it on a normal basis.
96-98 supposedly had a weaker belt the the 99+ hence needing to be changed at 60K first unlike the 99+ that don't need to be changed till the first 90K.
Just a thought.
My first one was done at 60K (just before I got the truck)
I am at 127K, I need to look, i wanted to change it at 120K but just have not had the time.
I just rather be safe then sorry, I don't want to be stranded on the side of the road...
I would still change it on a normal basis.
96-98 supposedly had a weaker belt the the 99+ hence needing to be changed at 60K first unlike the 99+ that don't need to be changed till the first 90K.
Just a thought.
My first one was done at 60K (just before I got the truck)
I am at 127K, I need to look, i wanted to change it at 120K but just have not had the time.
I just rather be safe then sorry, I don't want to be stranded on the side of the road...
#19
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba Canada
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm doing my belt/waterpump in the next 3weeks. I'm not sure if its ever been done.I live in a pretty harsh climate in Canada, so i'm curious to see what mine will look like. Currently at 163k - 2000 SR5
#20
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: springfield mo.
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
my w.p. went to leaking is one of the reasons i did mine as well. my idlers were pretty rough. i wont let it go another 220,000 miles i would say every 100,000 it kosher. unless u just have trouble. Toyota is just playing it safe.