Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

does a K+N FIPK filter kit help much?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 01:40 AM
  #1  
yotaluver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 754
Likes: 2
From: Fairfield, PA
does a K+N FIPK filter kit help much?

title says it all.. more mpg? more power? thanks.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 02:03 AM
  #2  
bob200587's Avatar
Contributing Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,546
Likes: 1
From: Nashville, TN
Not enough for what they charge for it. It's not a mod that will ever pay for itself, thats for sure. I got a K&N filter a while back....I like not having to change them if I'm in a dusty caravan or something, but I know Amsoil filters are even better. I don't know if there is one for 22RE or not. I'd like to get one tho.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 07:22 AM
  #3  
MNBOY's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
From: Sitka, AK
I put one on one of my older trucks, in combination with a header. Not sure if it was one thing, the other, or both together, but it seemed to squeak out some better throttle response and my mileage went up. Lots of the guys on here will tell you not to get it, that it lets too much dust and crap through. I never had that problem, and used it in some pretty bad conditions, but I was good about oiling it and washing regularly. I haven't heard anything good about the drop in filters, but the FIPK you are looking at doesn't seem to have the same poor fit problems.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 07:55 AM
  #4  
AH64ID's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,655
Likes: 0
From: Idaho
Amsoil doenst make one :-(, but I am getting a TrueFlow before my next wheeling adventure. I will use my K&N for street, but not the trail.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 08:12 AM
  #5  
Elton's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 12,261
Likes: 7
From: Siletz,Oregon
i have a k&n fipk on my truck and compared to my freinds truck that had the stock air box mine had a little more power and better thorrtle response
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 08:17 AM
  #6  
rdlsz24's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 6
From: Northern IL
There was a K&M drop-in installed on mine when I bought it... it seems like it does the job, and being cleanable is a plus.

Rob
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 09:56 AM
  #7  
Bobakazi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR
I like mine. Maybe it is in my head, but I do feel a little better throttle response than before I had it. I have had mine for many years with no problems. And you really are not supposed to clean them very often, according to the recharger kit. It says right on the box,
"Performance hints: Service every 50.000-100,000 miles on street driven applications. Service more often in off-road or heavy dust conditions. Let the dirt "build up" work for you; it will not hurt the performance and actually help filter the air."
I only clean mine once every couple of years, or when it looks really nasty. Plus, I really like the way they sound! A strong suction noise when you first step on the gas, and the engine sounds more throaty.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 09:59 AM
  #8  
Tacoclimber's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,659
Likes: 0
From: Between a rock and a hard place, AZ
I'll chime in here. I did the deckplate, ISR, and TRD filter (essentially the same thing as a K&N FIPK) all in the same day, and there was a definite noticable difference in throttle response and hp. I'm not talking 20 horses here, but it was definitely more peppy. And I second Bobakazi....it sounds way cooler...
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 10:17 AM
  #9  
ebelen1's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,963
Likes: 0
From: Socal
This is a cool thread b/c there are a lot of haters on this board about the FIPK for 3rd gens. Gadget even has a dyno that shows it loses power.

All that said, it was one of my first mods and I like it. Better throttle response, looks cool and sounds meaner. Haven't had the same issues that others have had w/ it fouling up the maf. Overall, it was worth it to me.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 10:22 AM
  #10  
Saint_Berzerker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
I didn't spend a load and get a KN, but I got a cheaper "copy cat" and it helped out. I did the stock air box removal and all that. When you dive into it, you see how little air the stock box gets. It makes it a little louder I think, but I think it responds a little better. I don't think my mileage went up very much if at all.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 11:48 AM
  #11  
yotaluver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 754
Likes: 2
From: Fairfield, PA
ok thanks guys
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 12:02 PM
  #12  
kyle_22r's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,981
Likes: 4
From: Lacey, WA
i'd rather run no filter than run a K&N. sure, it won't keep the larger rocks out of your engine, but you save $50...
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 12:05 PM
  #13  
Tacoclimber's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,659
Likes: 0
From: Between a rock and a hard place, AZ
Originally Posted by kyle_22r
i'd rather run no filter than run a K&N. sure, it won't keep the larger rocks out of your engine, but you save $50...
:pat: There's one in every family...
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 12:35 PM
  #14  
FilthyRich's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,218
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, Va
this is funny...WHEN i HAD MY 94 Jeep XJ, I ran an FIPK and it was great. Helped with power and mileage, but with the Toy (3.4), it sounded meaner, but I threw a CEL and got worde MPG. I think it depends on the vehicle and motor
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 12:49 PM
  #15  
Tacoclimber's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,659
Likes: 0
From: Between a rock and a hard place, AZ
It's probably similar to the TBS issue. My buddy with a Chevy Vortec put one on and it dyno'd at something like 15 more hp. But for the Toyotas, we get zip. I blew money on a TBS when I first got my truck and other than an interesting whistle that sounds like a turbo spooling up, it really didn't make a difference. But when I did the Deckplate, ISR, TRD filter... It was definitely different, both sound wise, and in throttle response, and I did notice that once I got to 3400 RPMs, man that thing would kick!
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 01:48 PM
  #16  
91ToyTrck's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
From: Roanoke, VA
I had the FIPK on my 92 toyota. I was running 4 suspension 3 body and 35 inch tires. I felt a greater throttle response and saw a slight improvement in my gas mileage.

I now have a 91 toyota ( again with the 3.0L ) but I did Cootees ISR Tube. I saw a very noticeable increase in gas mileage. I haven't dont any other mods to go along with or changed out my filter. I think this is an easier route to gain the same improvements. I like the fact that I'm not sucking hot air into my intake anymore.

I wont diss the FIPK, but I think there are cheaper solutions.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2006 | 10:37 AM
  #17  
celica's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,769
Likes: 1
please post the link to cootees ISR tube mod
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
smthwsn357
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
15
May 1, 2024 07:28 AM
malteserunner
Early Land Cruisers (Build-Up Section)
89
Feb 9, 2018 06:59 AM
calderp
Engine Swaps
2
Aug 16, 2016 05:15 PM
justdifferentials
Just Differentials
1
Sep 17, 2015 06:14 PM
calderp
Pre 84 Trucks
8
Jul 27, 2015 09:58 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:24 PM.