Offroad Tech Discussion pertaining to additions or questions which improve off-road ability, recovery and safety, such as suspension, body lifts, lockers etc
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

who wants to get rid of the idler arm and centerlink?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 05:57 PM
  #1  
Napoleon047's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, MO
who wants to get rid of the idler arm and centerlink?

and i dont mean an SAS

it seems the weakness in the IFS steering is mainly the idler arm, followed by a bent centerlink.

a standard tie rod between the two knuckles would not work very well because the suspension would be acting independently while the steering would try to tie them together.

so, after looking at the steering on a jeep (yeah i know) i thought why not? this is known as an inverted-y setup


this is on a long travel kit at full extension. on my stock IFS, no t-bar crank etc, the linkage would sit almost perfectly flat.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 06:28 PM
  #2  
colsoncj's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,644
Likes: 2
From: Monett, MO (Springfield)
I don't think its that bad of an idea... my only thought is try and find common parts to do it with, so if something does break, you can run to your local parts store and pick up a new one. and hopefully at a cheaper price than a yoda idler.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 07:16 PM
  #3  
joez's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,252
Likes: 0
From: Elwood, Il
That is exactly what ford did on their TTB suspensions. After that dissaster of a front end, i dont know why anybody would coppy it. The main problem is that the suspension and steering linkage move in completely different arcs and put a lot of stress on the joints, and wears everything out quite fast. I personally think its a bad idea.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2004 | 05:19 AM
  #4  
ZUK's Avatar
ZUK
Registered User
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 26
From: Prescott AZ
Originally Posted by joez
That is exactly what ford did on their TTB suspensions. After that dissaster of a front end, i dont know why anybody would coppy it. The main problem is that the suspension and steering linkage move in completely different arcs and put a lot of stress on the joints, and wears everything out quite fast. I personally think its a bad idea.


joez has a valid point.....after I looked at the angle the lower A arm goes thru....and the angle that the tie-rod goes....they are different which means when you hit a bump the wheels violently toe in then out. Not a good thing. Nice try though. ZUK

Last edited by ZUK; Oct 22, 2004 at 05:21 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2004 | 06:26 AM
  #5  
Shane's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,000
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Originally Posted by joez
That is exactly what ford did on their TTB suspensions. After that dissaster of a front end, i dont know why anybody would coppy it. The main problem is that the suspension and steering linkage move in completely different arcs and put a lot of stress on the joints, and wears everything out quite fast. I personally think its a bad idea.
Hello Nail, meet Hammer.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2004 | 08:07 AM
  #6  
Napoleon047's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, MO
meh, thats why im going SAS
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2004 | 02:19 AM
  #7  
alanbobalan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
From: chino hills, ca
SAS, way to go for me but i don't have the money right now. boooooo! but soon....... SAS from all pro and i will be in good shape
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ladybugRC
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
458
Aug 21, 2020 10:41 AM
live4soccer7
84-85 Trucks & 4Runners
3
May 11, 2016 06:52 PM
ktm192k
Pre 84 Trucks
1
Oct 1, 2015 08:47 AM
JookUpVandetti
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
10
Sep 30, 2015 08:58 AM
tylermx71
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
13
Sep 29, 2015 08:49 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:48 PM.