95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners 4th gen pickups and 3rd gen 4Runners

just test drove 05 Tacoma

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 10:26 AM
  #1  
jacksonpt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
From: Binghamton, NY
just test drove 05 Tacoma

Probably going to be a lot of these threads in the coming weeks, but here's mine...

2005 Tacoma
V6 Double Cab
Long Bed
TRD Sport Package
$30,322

Drove it about 15 miles... a brief stint on the highway, some around town stuff... some smooth roads, some time in pothole hell.

First Impressions:
It's a beautiful truck. Lines are sleek, but still fitting for a truck (except for the hood scoop ).

Interior is very comfy... seats are great, controls/steering wheel/dash/etc. is right where it should be.

Power was decent. Certainly better than my truck, but not what I was expecting. Powered right along, but was not quick. Will get you into traffic, but not exactly confidence inspiring. Power was definitely better from 50-80, but from 10-40mph it was not significantly different from my 8-year old truck on power sapping 33" MTs.

Ride quality was good. Took some getting used to though. I'm used to my super stiff suspension that doesn't soak up anything but also doesn't lean in turns. Initially I thought the truck felt huge because of the way it "wallowed' in the turns, but I quickly got used to it and thought the truck handled reasonably well for a stock truck and rode well. The Tacoma was smooth, felt pretty solid, and generally felt good.

Overall I liked it, but I was not wowed by it. I was very excited about the truck, and perhaps that's part of my problem, but it did not impress me. And for $30k, I expected to be impressed.

At this moment, I'm undecided about whether or not I want to buy one. I hope to get one for an extended test drive soon.

Last edited by jacksonpt; Oct 19, 2004 at 10:38 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 10:34 AM
  #2  
BT17R's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,918
Likes: 1
From: Da Gorge, Oregon
Both the throttle and transmission are electronically controlled with adaptive AI. I found that after a few hours of "spirited" driving that the truck became noticeably quicker. It would spin it's TRD Off-Road Package tires from a standing start on dry asphalt to the point that TRAC kicked in. I drove a short bed that's only 45 lbs. lighter than a long bed, an insignificant difference. How did you like the turning radius? Ride quality?
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 10:39 AM
  #3  
jacksonpt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
From: Binghamton, NY
Originally Posted by BT17R
Both the throttle and transmission are electronically controlled with adaptive AI. I found that after a few hours of "spirited" driving that the truck became noticeably quicker. It would spin it's TRD Off-Road Package tires from a standing start on dry asphalt to the point that TRAC kicked in. I drove a short bed that's only 45 lbs. lighter than a long bed, an insignificant difference. How did you like the turning radius? Ride quality?
Sorry... I forgot to comment on the ride - I added a section in my previous post.

Turning radius... didn't really notice it. I only drove around town, so I didn't really test it, but I didn't feel the lengthy wheelbase at all.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 11:02 AM
  #4  
BT17R's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,918
Likes: 1
From: Da Gorge, Oregon
Thanks for the ride quality comments. I drove the Off-Road Package and thought the ride was soft but supple with a long travel suspension on both ends, a little moreso on the front. I didn't notice any wallowing, though. In fact I was impressed that on paved two-lane mountain twisties it was so stable once the suspension compressed. The specs indicate that the Sport Package is tuned more for on road ride and handling, so I wonder if you were feeling the effects of a wheelbase substantially longer than the short bed I drove?
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 11:03 AM
  #5  
SLC Punk's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,862
Likes: 0
From: SLC, UT
Have you driven the Tundra with the VVTi V8 (2005)? If so, how do they compare with each other? For $30K, you are looking at Tundra DC SR5 TRD prices.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 11:06 AM
  #6  
jacksonpt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
From: Binghamton, NY
Originally Posted by BT17R
Thanks for the ride quality comments. I drove the Off-Road Package and thought the ride was soft but supple with a long travel suspension on both ends, a little moreso on the front. I didn't notice any wallowing, though. In fact I was impressed that on paved two-lane mountain twisties it was so stable once the suspension compressed. The specs indicate that the Sport Package is tuned more for on road ride and handling, so I wonder if you were feeling the effects of a wheelbase substantially longer than the short bed I drove?
Like I said above... once I got used to the ride, I didn't notice the wallowing - it was mostly just the first few miles. My truck has virtually zero body roll/lean in the turns under normal driving. The Tacoma didn't have a lot (certainly better than any domestic truck I've driven), but there was noticably more roll than with my truck.

Again... after 10 minutes, I didn't notice it and, for the most part, enjoyed the ride.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 11:08 AM
  #7  
jacksonpt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
From: Binghamton, NY
Originally Posted by SLC Punk
Have you driven the Tundra with the VVTi V8 (2005)? If so, how do they compare with each other? For $30K, you are looking at Tundra DC SR5 TRD prices.
I drove the VVTI V8 tundra about a month ago or so. Definitely a bigger truck... feels bigger, drives bigger, acts bigger. But I think the width is probably why moreso than anything else. The V8 has noticably more power from at any point below 60 (didn't really get either of them over 65 for any length of time). IMO, the tacoma is far more comfortable, but the tundra felt a bit more solid on rough roads.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 11:18 AM
  #8  
SLC Punk's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,862
Likes: 0
From: SLC, UT
Thanks for the info. So the V8 felt a lot stronger than the 4.0L... How would you say that 4.0L compares to the 3.4L Supercharged?

Sorry for all the questions, I really need to go and test drive them myself, but I just don't have time.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 11:57 AM
  #9  
jacksonpt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
From: Binghamton, NY
Originally Posted by SLC Punk
Thanks for the info. So the V8 felt a lot stronger than the 4.0L... How would you say that 4.0L compares to the 3.4L Supercharged?

Sorry for all the questions, I really need to go and test drive them myself, but I just don't have time.
The V8 was definitely stronger than than the 6, but not night and day. For daily driving/mall running, either would be fine. If you did any kind of towing/hauling, you'd probably want the V8 - especially considering how close the prices are.

I've never been in a SC 3.4, so I can't comment on that.

No problem with the questions... keep them coming - I'm happy to answer them as best I can.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 02:11 PM
  #10  
Schuey2002's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Did you (anyone above) drive the 6-speed in the new Taco, or was it the auto?? If so, how was the manual tranny? Was it silky smooth?

M-T minds are curious.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 02:21 PM
  #11  
jtmaxx7's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Mililani HI
$30K, WOW! That's way to much for a compact p/u. Is it still a compact?
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 02:31 PM
  #12  
Schuey2002's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
It looks more like a midsized truck than a compact.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 03:56 AM
  #13  
jacksonpt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
From: Binghamton, NY
I drove the auto, so no comments on the 6speed.

I think technically they are still classified as a compact truck, but for all practicle purposes, it's a midsize IMO. The Tundra is going full size soon, so the Tacoma would fit nicely in the midsize market. Not sure what Toyota's plans are for the FTX though.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 04:02 AM
  #14  
wv4runner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Damn....$30k+ for Toyota's entry model truck. I hope I'm more impressed than you when I drive it, especially for that money.

Last edited by wv4runner; Oct 20, 2004 at 04:13 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 04:10 AM
  #15  
jacksonpt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
From: Binghamton, NY
Originally Posted by wv4runner
Damn....$30k for Toyota's entry model truck. I hope I'm more impressed than you when I drive it, especially for that money.
That's the kicker for me... I wouldn't have any problem spending $30k on the Tacoma - it's that nice. But for $33ish, I can get a similarly equipped Tundra...
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 05:40 AM
  #16  
SLC Punk's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,862
Likes: 0
From: SLC, UT
Originally Posted by jacksonpt
That's the kicker for me... I wouldn't have any problem spending $30k on the Tacoma - it's that nice. But for $33ish, I can get a similarly equipped Tundra...
Same here. After I went and looked at one, I would spend $30K becuase it is really nice. But I could have a V8 Tundra (which would pull my boat better) for a tad bit more.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 05:46 AM
  #17  
jacksonpt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
From: Binghamton, NY
Originally Posted by SLC Punk
Same here. After I went and looked at one, I would spend $30K becuase it is really nice. But I could have a V8 Tundra (which would pull my boat better) for a tad bit more.
EXACTLY! For me, the draw to a tundra is the V8 and getting a bit more truck for basically the same money. The draw to the Tacoma is that it's faaar more comfortable (IMO) and the gas mileage is better.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 05:51 AM
  #18  
SLC Punk's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,862
Likes: 0
From: SLC, UT
Originally Posted by jacksonpt
EXACTLY! For me, the draw to a tundra is the V8 and getting a bit more truck for basically the same money. The draw to the Tacoma is that it's faaar more comfortable (IMO) and the gas mileage is better.
Well maybe you should wait until next year, then they will be introducing the 06 Tundra(should be redesigned). The 05 Tundra's will become really cheap!
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 05:56 AM
  #19  
jacksonpt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
From: Binghamton, NY
yea... but waiting has never been my strong suit. I'm eyeballing and FJ40 at the moment...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flying91
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
45
Apr 11, 2024 04:39 PM
Sleaker
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
17
Aug 26, 2020 06:03 AM
the1998sr5
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
15
Jul 14, 2020 08:35 PM
itzmywife's
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
2
Jul 25, 2015 04:55 PM
Poncho0206
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners
3
Jul 10, 2015 06:21 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:49 AM.