Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

Install pics - TRD Supercharger on top of '89 3.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 10, 2010 | 09:32 AM
  #1  
OutlawMike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 710
Likes: 2
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Install pics - TRD Supercharger on top of '89 3.0




Ya, that is about as close to installed as you can get one of those on a 3.0. Had to put it on there just to dream about a 3.4 swap with the S/C.

My buddy bought it off Craigslist for his '97 4Runner. 120k miles on the S/C. We did a rebuild on it, replaced all of the bearings and seals, except for the bearings and seals that are in the rotor assembly. Those seemed just fine and pulling the rotors and gears off of the shaft opens up severe timing issues when you reassemble, better left to someone with a jig for pressing them back together and making sure the rotors and gears are timed to perfection.

Should get it on his rig in two or three weeks.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2010 | 09:37 AM
  #2  
250000_yota's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
From: Longmont, CO
you scared me there for a second...
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2010 | 09:47 AM
  #3  
Elton's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 12,261
Likes: 7
From: Siletz,Oregon
^ ^

Last edited by Elton; Sep 10, 2010 at 09:48 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2010 | 09:48 AM
  #4  
Magnusian's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 1
From: Downtown Heckronto, Ontario, Soviet Canuckistan
Hey now, just because the SC on the 3.0 is a joke, doesn't mean you should take a dump on the thread. :/
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2010 | 10:17 AM
  #5  
diablo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: Graham,WA.
Wow,cool
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2010 | 10:20 AM
  #6  
dieselloco427's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 297
Likes: 1
From: Norfolk, VA
Sweet!! I thought about putting a turbo on my 3.0 - but no where to put it in the engine compartment.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2010 | 10:34 AM
  #7  
tumor21's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
From: Fremont, CA
damn! you almost had me searching the web for 3.0 runners to buy. Good lil trick thread though... you got me. LOL
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2010 | 11:23 AM
  #8  
okie81's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,816
Likes: 0
From: Nor, CAL
Can't wait to see the hood scoop
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2010 | 11:34 AM
  #9  
camo31_10.50's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,334
Likes: 4
From: Vian, OK
what was the differences between the 1st gen SC and the 2nd gen SC?
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2010 | 11:40 AM
  #10  
tried4x2signN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 4
From: Nashville TN. I can help you if you're close BUT NOBODY CAN HELP YOU IF YOU DON'T FILL YOUR LOCATION IN!
lol... I'd just slam the hood then outline the dent with a paint pen so you know where to cut
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2010 | 11:50 AM
  #11  
OutlawMike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 710
Likes: 2
From: Santa Rosa, CA
What was the deal with the spamming posts? Maybe I hit a nerve with someone. I thought it was kind of funny last night at 10:00 when we finished the rebuild and layed it on there. Ahhh, to have a 3.4.

According to my buddy, there are actually 4 generations of the S/C for the 3.4 They all use an M62 S/C, no difference in the actual S/C rotors, gears, etc.

The first three are all with the tan colored, multipiece aluminum housing. The first one shipped with a two pulley idler/tensioner arrangement on a plate. The second version eliminated one of those pulleys, as there were belt issues. The third version got rid of the tensioner plate all together and went with a dynamic tensioner.

Then, the fourth version came out the black one. The housing is all one big sand cast piece of aluminum, so there are a lot less sealing surfaces. It uses the dynamic tensioner. I have not had my hands on one of those yet, so that is about the extent of my knowledge of that version.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2010 | 12:07 PM
  #12  
250000_yota's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
From: Longmont, CO
Just before i left the dealership, i got to put a brand-new-in-the-box 4th gen on a 2001 Taco. It already had TRD headers, an AEM intake and a off brand muffler. very easy to put on, and very nice.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2010 | 01:26 PM
  #13  
BMcEL's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 0
From: Oregon, USA
I bet the poor 3.0 was thinking 'ya, go ahead and try to get more power out of me...I'll show you stubborn' haahahah.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2010 | 01:57 PM
  #14  
xxxtreme22r's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 13,574
Likes: 72
From: Wilkes-Barre, PA, USA
ok I fell for it too, I was like whaaaaat?
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2010 | 01:59 PM
  #15  
OutlawMike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 710
Likes: 2
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Originally Posted by 250000_yota
Just before i left the dealership, i got to put a brand-new-in-the-box 4th gen on a 2001 Taco. It already had TRD headers, an AEM intake and a off brand muffler. very easy to put on, and very nice.
The tan ones are actually a pretty nice piece of work. I was impressed with the quality of both the machined surfaces and the castings. I did not see a lot of core shift in the sand castings, and they really took their time on the final pass on the sealing surfaces with the mill. All in all a quality unit.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2010 | 02:00 PM
  #16  
OutlawMike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 710
Likes: 2
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Originally Posted by bmcel
I bet the poor 3.0 was thinking 'ya, go ahead and try to get more power out of me...I'll show you stubborn' haahahah.
I think it was shaking in it's oil pan. Please don't do this to me!! I will blow a head gasket in the first five minutes at half throttle!!
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2010 | 02:16 PM
  #17  
Elton's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 12,261
Likes: 7
From: Siletz,Oregon
the cost of s/c a 3.4 id rather just stick in a 1uz
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2010 | 02:25 PM
  #18  
xxxtreme22r's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 13,574
Likes: 72
From: Wilkes-Barre, PA, USA
Originally Posted by Elton
the cost of s/c a 3.4 id rather just stick in a 1uz

it would be a 2jz-gte for me. can you say 1000HP
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2010 | 02:34 PM
  #19  
250000_yota's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
From: Longmont, CO
Originally Posted by OutlawMike
The tan ones are actually a pretty nice piece of work. I was impressed with the quality of both the machined surfaces and the castings. I did not see a lot of core shift in the sand castings, and they really took their time on the final pass on the sealing surfaces with the mill. All in all a quality unit.
I cant remember where i heard it, so dont quote me, but i heard the gray s/c's had bearing issues that were resolved in the black one...
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2010 | 04:21 PM
  #20  
OutlawMike's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 710
Likes: 2
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Originally Posted by 250000_yota
I cant remember where i heard it, so dont quote me, but i heard the gray s/c's had bearing issues that were resolved in the black one...
Had not heard that, could be true, but not based on this one particular unit.

This one had 120k miles on it and the bearings really were not bad. They seemed tight, but once we had them out, why put the old ones back in?

The snout bearings are just standard open cage ball bearings pressed onto a shaft. You can get them at any local bearing supply house. These two are lubed with the S/C oil in the nose assembly.

There are two needle bearings in the back of the unit that support the tail end of the rotors. Those bearings are not sealed, just cups that press into the rotor housing. They are essentially open to the air flow that goes through the S/C and are pre-lubed with a "special" high temp grease. If there were problems with bearings, I would suspect those two, as they only have the grease they come with. But, in this unit, the grease was still smooth, not dried out, and there seemed to be plenty in there.

There are two bearings behind the S/C gears (also lubed with the S/C oil) that support the front end of the rotors, we did not replace those, as I said above, due to timing concerns. There are no clocking features on the shafts, rotors, or gears, that we could find without pressing everything apart. I suspect they had a jig to line it all up and press it together. There are also two dynamic seals on the rotor shafts that seal the S/C oil into the nose housing. These were not leaking, so, that just reinforced the opinion of not messing with the rotor bearings and seals.

The actual S/C in this assembly is nothing special. It is an M62 S/C that has/does ship on a bunch of different production vehicles. I doubt the S/C rotor bearing design is custom for the Toyota application. The nose assembly may be, due to the need to get the belt pulley lined up and put the S/C in the best place for the airflow plumbing.

The link below shows the exact S/C that is in the housing TRD designed. The bearings on the back of the S/C housing are visible, same stuff we saw in this unit:

http://www.capa.com.au/eaton_m62data.htm

It was fund tearing it down and figuring out how it was designed, not something that I had been inside before, so it was a kick.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RedRunner_87
95.5-2004 Tacomas & 96-2002 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
84
Jun 1, 2021 01:51 PM
icentropy
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
22
Sep 16, 2020 02:47 PM
jerusry
Axles - Suspensions - Tires - Wheels
1
Oct 19, 2015 05:28 PM
Cplmike
Newbie Tech Section
5
Jul 8, 2015 08:47 PM
bryan34w
84-85 Trucks & 4Runners
0
Jul 6, 2015 05:53 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:33 PM.