Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

New Cam, how about new rockers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 25, 2008 | 11:02 PM
  #1  
drew303's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,880
Likes: 2
From: Olympia, WA
New Cam, how about new rockers?

Ok, so I just drove down to engnbldrs shop today and got a new cylinder head (woohoo!), full rock guard gasket set and new headbolts. I'm doing this top-end as right as I know how.

I got a brand new 260 cam and its in there. The motor is put back together but Im waiting till the morning to turn it over (dont wanna wake the neighbors with the break in)... but that gets me to my question. I've read that if the rockers look fine (no gouges in the old cam or rocker lobes, and the part that hits the valves has the hour-glass wear pattern its OK).

My rocker assembly all looks fine, no abnormal wear (to my eye).

Wondering what people do for new cam installs, if your rockers look GOOD is it cool to re-use em or does everyone have them resurfaced? replaced? whats the deal.

thanks
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2008 | 12:23 AM
  #2  
Jeenyus04's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: washington
I reused mine, no big deal, the only thing is to look for the wear where the rockers on on the shafts because sometimes that other thingy (sorry lol) that sits next to them on the shaft to keep them lined up will start to wear in to them. Also people replace the adjusting screws for the valves because those can wear uneven. your call.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2008 | 06:07 AM
  #3  
InternetRoadkill's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 6
From: San Antonio, Texas
You risk destroying the new cam by re-using the rockers. The cam may not break-in properly.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2008 | 07:27 AM
  #4  
corax's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,133
Likes: 7
From: PDX
Originally Posted by InternetRoadkill
You risk destroying the new cam by re-using the rockers. The cam may not break-in properly.
run your finger lengthwise along the rocker over the shiny part the cam pushes on. do you feel the small "dip" in that pad? that was worn over many miles to the previous cam. In a perfect world you replace the rockers with the cam. However I've done it both ways (usually due to lack of money) with no problem. If the "dip" is barely noticable, you should be OK.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2008 | 08:11 AM
  #5  
drew303's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,880
Likes: 2
From: Olympia, WA
I felt no dip(s) on any of the rockers, they all still have their dome like shape or rounded figure with no gouges or anything abnormal.

I also lubed the crap out of it all with the high pressure assembly lube. During the the initial valve adjustment (turning the crank 360) the the rocker pads moved smoothly on the cam lobes. in other words no weird pattern in any of the grease on the lobes.

Well im gonna go do the break in now. See what happens, hell with it =p
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2008 | 08:37 AM
  #6  
saitotiktmdog's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 776
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
I have reused rocker assemblies on several engines with no issues. Just inspect them as the previous poster has stated to be sure it is still good.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2008 | 10:00 AM
  #7  
rusche's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 450
Likes: 1
From: Hayden, ID
When I rebuild mine and put in a 268 cam I reused my rocker assembly, not problems to speak of after about 1,000 miles.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2008 | 10:13 AM
  #8  
abecedarian's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,723
Likes: 6
From: Temecula Valley, CA
when new, the cam and rocker wear into each other. microscopic differences in the hardness of the contact surface across the face of the cam lobe and rocker cause the two to wear down the softer parts of the surfaces until they both match each other and the load is distributed evenly over the surfaces. there are microscopic grooves on the the rocker which will definitely not match the cam surface and will unnecessarily wear down the cam lobes. and usually, the wear rate increases over time.

for humor's sake I ask, would you change a brake rotor and not the pads? would you hone a cylinder without replacing the rings, or vice versa? would you surface your flywheel and not change the clutch and pressure plate? If the rocker shafts were worn out, would you not replace the rockers?

Last edited by abecedarian; Aug 26, 2008 at 10:15 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2008 | 10:59 AM
  #9  
surf4runner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,476
Likes: 1
From: so.cal
Originally Posted by drew303
See what happens, hell with it =p
if your not replacing them (best idea) then at least polish/refinish the old. gives a new surface for the new cam.




there is never time to do it right the first time, but always time to do it over.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2008 | 11:11 AM
  #10  
saitotiktmdog's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 776
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Originally Posted by abecedarian
when new, the cam and rocker wear into each other. microscopic differences in the hardness of the contact surface across the face of the cam lobe and rocker cause the two to wear down the softer parts of the surfaces until they both match each other and the load is distributed evenly over the surfaces. there are microscopic grooves on the the rocker which will definitely not match the cam surface and will unnecessarily wear down the cam lobes. and usually, the wear rate increases over time.

for humor's sake I ask, would you change a brake rotor and not the pads? would you hone a cylinder without replacing the rings, or vice versa? would you surface your flywheel and not change the clutch and pressure plate? If the rocker shafts were worn out, would you not replace the rockers?
Check what the manual says about the wear tolerances. They have those for a reason. As long as it is till within spec than its ok. So yeah I would hone a cylinder and put the old rings back in if the rings and cylinder were still within spec. Especially if on a budget. In a world where money grows on trees than no. Rockers will cost from 60 to 115 for a set and then you have to redo the rocker assy. Which one should not mess with themself. Heard of bad things happening when this is done. So bet on 300 dollars or more for a new/rebuilt assy with labor. Becasue if you replace the rocker you then must also replace the rocker shafts($85) using the above posters theory. Not trying to bust anyones balls here. Yes it would be ideal but necessary no. However I would check with the company that the cam is purchased from. For example LC Engineering will not warranty the cam if new rockers are not installed. In this case it may be worth replacing the rockers. Otherwise I would not worry about it.

Last edited by saitotiktmdog; Aug 26, 2008 at 11:24 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2008 | 12:52 AM
  #11  
drew303's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,880
Likes: 2
From: Olympia, WA
It's running fine so far, I inspected it again tonight and to the naked eye nothing is wearing abnormal.

Besides, what exactly is the worse that could happen? How could a rocker actually destroy a cam lobe so bad that it impaired performance... ON a 22r? They, even new don't run as beautifuly smooth as some motors. They forever tick some and mis some so.... I'm beginning to learn its a 22r and not brain surgery =p
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LittleUgly
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
15
Jan 2, 2020 01:30 PM
moparbay
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
5
Oct 6, 2015 09:24 AM
tylermx71
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
13
Sep 29, 2015 08:49 PM
whiteyota93
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
11
Sep 29, 2015 02:31 PM
voiddweller
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
16
Sep 28, 2015 11:21 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:39 AM.