Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

Ebay find: High Output 3vze

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 08:53 PM
  #1  
CoedNaked's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Ebay find: High Output 3vze

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/3-0L-...spagenameZWDVW

Another ebay find: LCE Headers for a 22RE.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Toyot...spagenameZWDVW

NWOR 3vze chrome headers for a manual:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/TOYOT...spagenameZWDVW

Last edited by CoedNaked; Dec 4, 2007 at 08:56 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 09:01 PM
  #2  
98sr5tacoma's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
haha i like the description for the guy selling the 3.0 he says should be putting out 400 horsepower hahahah please if anything its putting out maybe as much as a 3.4 stock but thats pushing it
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 09:09 PM
  #3  
apalmer1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
From: Bend, OR.
400hp at the crank maybe... I could see like 200-250 but thats the absolute MAX i could conceive coming from one of those engines
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 09:15 PM
  #4  
98sr5tacoma's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
yeah but with just a mild rebuild and headers are gonna get youu maybe a 30 horse boost. fullly built and race prepped (which that definately isnt) could put out 400 I bet but with forced induction and all the other goodies
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 09:46 PM
  #5  
crolison's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,571
Likes: 2
From: TN
hey i think if i had a 400hp engine it might be resting on something better than a used tire.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 09:48 PM
  #6  
CoedNaked's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Well look at the spec's, assuming they are true. High compression pistons with an 11.5 to 1 ratio - makes you almost wonder if you could burn diesel with the thing it's got such a high compression ratio. You'd probably need 94 octane PLUS octane boost. Then it's got high duration camshafts which probably make it idle so rough you probably gotta keep your idle up at 1500 RPM's. Then he says he bored it .100 over. That's a decent "chunk" of a bore. It looks like it has NWOR headers - (ball and socket design right?).
I'd love to see if this engine is indeed "true," and I'd also be interested in what other parts or things have been done to handle that high of a compression ratio.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 11:16 PM
  #7  
az4x4runner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 16
From: Yavapai County, Arizona
Originally Posted by 98sr5tacoma
yeah but with just a mild rebuild and headers are gonna get youu maybe a 30 horse boost. fullly built and race prepped (which that definately isnt) could put out 400 I bet but with forced induction and all the other goodies
I doubt a 3.0 could handle forced induction.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 11:57 PM
  #8  
olharleyman's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,607
Likes: 2
From: maryland
I am think'n if I was going to rebuild a motor to that extent I would at least clean every thing up if not repaint it all to make it look like I just did a ass load of work to it especially since its all torn down and its the cheapest part of the rebuild then I would want it on a engine stand for sure not a tire.

And with that much hp I would Patient that recipe and sell it as a kit to guy's like us since no one else is doing any kind of hp like that.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 12:15 AM
  #9  
notanymore's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
From: Wenatchee WA
i think that guy with that engine needs to put the crackpipe down because i highly doubt that that is putting out anywhere close to 400hp. and am i the only person that thinks being bored .100 over is just way to much? but that is a nice find on the lce headers
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 02:20 PM
  #10  
liferunner2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by az4x4runner
I doubt a 3.0 could handle forced induction.
You really don't think so. Maybe not with the stock HG problems, but most of the Toyota bottom ends are much more stout than they need to be for whatever application that Toyota intended for them. I'm sure you could run moderate boost pressure on a stock bottom end.

Chris
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 02:25 PM
  #11  
swaycleveland's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
From: north ridgeville ohio
im thinking you CAN get 400hp out of it with one minor mod NOS lol dont think it will last more then one or 2 sprays but ya might get that out of it and monkey might faly out of my ....
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 02:31 PM
  #12  
elripster's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 3
From: Plainfield, IL
How many of the posters here so far have built and dyno'd 3.0 engines for high performance. I'll take a wild guess: none.

So basically all that has been posted criticizing the engine and seller is baseless conjecture. Good got that out of the way.

If I were to consider bidding on this engine I would ask the seller for his sources to the claim and contact/research them. He has not provided a dyno slip and really should give more substantiation to his claim. I would also inquire as to the smog-ability of this engine for those who live in states where it matters.

Frank
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 02:35 PM
  #13  
tc's Avatar
tc
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,875
Likes: 3
From: Longmont, CO
I don't think 400HP at the crank is out of the question, with as built as that motor is. The ones TRD built for Ivan Stewart back in the day were making mor than that. The one thing I learned about car engines in Thermodynamics is that compression cures all!

The 3.0 will definitely handle forced induction. That's what the "Z" in 3VZE means. (Agreed, it will have to be with good head gaskets)

The thing is that he probably has a fortune and a ton of time into building it to that extent.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 06:09 PM
  #14  
InternetRoadkill's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 6
From: San Antonio, Texas
There's no way that's making anywhere near 400HP. I'd place it closer to 200HP for a N/A engine.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 06:13 PM
  #15  
Greg_Canada's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 1
From: Toronto
Originally Posted by tc
I don't think 400HP at the crank is out of the question, with as built as that motor is. The ones TRD built for Ivan Stewart back in the day were making mor than that. The one thing I learned about car engines in Thermodynamics is that compression cures all!

The 3.0 will definitely handle forced induction. That's what the "Z" in 3VZE means. (Agreed, it will have to be with good head gaskets)

The thing is that he probably has a fortune and a ton of time into building it to that extent.
LOL no dude ure wrong. the "z" or "t" has to come after the dash "-"
Example, 3.slow
3vz-e

mk3 supra motor
7m-gte

ae86 motor
4a-ge

mr2 supercharged
4a-gze

almost

oh and there was an ivan motor for sale a few months ago, i believe it was over 300hp, it had dry sump oiling, headers, and ITB's (independent throttle bodies).... 12:1 and redline of like 8000rpm... that would be a fun 3.fast... hehehe....oh and thanks for posting those links... htose NWOR headers are 20 min from me! i've never found any in canada before!....
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 06:15 PM
  #16  
dropzone's Avatar
Fossilized
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 19,771
Likes: 456
From: PNW
I wondering if he is charging extra for the cracked fan.
Also nice that he is leaving all the intakes open on top for whatever to fall into...
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2007 | 06:46 AM
  #17  
tc's Avatar
tc
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 8,875
Likes: 3
From: Longmont, CO
OK - maybe so.

But there's plenty of 5VZ-FE's running around with boost and no issues, and it's basically the same bottom end.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2007 | 06:55 AM
  #18  
jagger_snitt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland,Tn
$1,500 isn't a bad price if it runs. You can nit pick all day but not a bad price.
The headers and centerforce clutch make up alot of his price. $211 for the cheapest centerforce II and at least $300 for the headers means your paying $1,000 for the engine. To each his own. He did leave him self an out "So now I have a (sopposed to be) close to the 400HP range" Haha. It would be worth checking out if your close.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2007 | 12:13 PM
  #19  
DudeBud's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,871
Likes: 0
From: WA ,monroe
Originally Posted by tc
OK - maybe so.

But there's plenty of 5VZ-FE's running around with boost and no issues, and it's basically the same bottom end.
not the bottom end that's the problem.


.100 over on the bore is dumb thats to close to water jackets then he goes on to say that these motors can take a .180 bore
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2007 | 12:30 PM
  #20  
Belize Off Road Team's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,850
Likes: 1
From: Edmonton, Alberta
im thinking if there was REALLY away to get a 3.0 from a Runner/pick-up to get up too 400+hp im almost certain that someone else would have done it by now and posted it somewhere!
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:33 PM.