Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

feeling slightly overgeared with 3.0L 4.88 33x10.5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 1, 2007 | 10:15 PM
  #1  
taikowaza's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 784
Likes: 1
From: Dakotas
feeling slightly overgeared with 3.0L 4.88 33x10.5

when I switched to 4.88s from 4.56 with my 32x11.5 BFGs I could feel a big increase in torque.
since changing to 33x10.5 I am feeling overgeared and kind of wish I had gone with 5.29.
I remember both Zuk and Ganoid telling me that I could choose to 'go with the gusto' and gear a manual running 33s at 5.29, but I was worried that I would be redlining all the time. Just my opinion, the 32" tires were perfect with 4.88, and with 33" I'd say that 5.29 would be super sweet. I wish I could simply regear to 5.29 but with the truetracs in there it would be just too pricey. anyway, i still have power and it seems to be 'stock'...but I simply liked the extra torque that lower gearing brings! anybody else running 5.29 gears on 33" tires with a manual 2nd gen? I think that if I ever do it again that's what I'll choose. thanks for letting me vent guys!
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2007 | 10:27 PM
  #2  
olharleyman's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,607
Likes: 2
From: maryland
I run 35's with 5.29 and it's a big differance from the 32's and 5.29's and think with 33 it would be fine. I lose pulling on hill's but i have 220,xxx on my motor so that maybe a factor but the way they pull on flat ground I can run 80 no problem so I think I would pick up the pulling on hill's and still get 75-80with the 33's.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 05:18 AM
  #3  
thook's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,656
Likes: 16
From: NW Ark on wooded ten acres...Ozarks at large!
Hell, I WANTED to run 4.88's with 31's, buuuut....that didn't happen. I like renegade ideas.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 07:00 AM
  #4  
Jay351's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,055
Likes: 10
From: maple ridge, British Columbia, Canada
Now you got me worried, I just picked up a set of 4.88's
But Im sure since im already running 33's It will feel better
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 07:38 AM
  #5  
Tacoma750's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
4:88s and 33s should be pretty good man...i think 5:29s are to deep for 33s.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 07:46 AM
  #6  
CRONK4X's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: STOCKTON CA
With 35 How Do You Like 5.29 Can You Still Hit Freeway Speeds Ok
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 08:09 AM
  #7  
Djlarroc's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
I'm gona be running 32's pretty soon and I'm looking to go to 4.88s. I have a 22RE, Manual.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 07:35 PM
  #8  
taikowaza's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 784
Likes: 1
From: Dakotas
4.88 w/33s manual 2nd gen

don't get me wrong...the 4.88 gearing is 'fine' with the 33s on a manual, but
I compare it with the torque I felt when I had 32s and its less. I think it was mountaingoat who said that one of the best ways to get power in an older engine is gearing, I think that's true. IMHO i'd be happier having a lower gearing, for hills, and it would match the RPMs better. at this point, 5th gear is not so useful for me, if I want to have power I keep it in 4th gear even at 65/70MPH, 5th gear drops me way back down to below 3000 and just below my nice powerband even at highway speed, so I'm just missing it in 5th gear until I start going 75mph or so. just a little lower gearing would get me in the pocket even at 5th gear. anyway it's nitpicking, but I may look into regearing to 5.29 someday with the manual. it'll be pricey tho! what kind of coin would I be talking to have this done I wonder, surely too much for comfort

Last edited by taikowaza; Nov 2, 2007 at 07:36 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 08:05 PM
  #9  
elripster's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 3
From: Plainfield, IL
I ran 33's with 4.56's and 4.88's. The 4.88's were perfect. You might make sure your engine is in good tune. I could pull all the hills in San Diego in 5th gear with the AC on and people in my '89 3.0 with 33's and 4.88's. As it is, 4.88's leave you about 6% under geared.

Frank
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 08:09 PM
  #10  
Tacoma750's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Yea the 4:88s should be enough man..honestly. My buddy runs 4:88s and 35s on his 4 banger!!! and he still has 5th gear. You might be loosing power somewhere. When sthe last time u did plugs and wires? all that crap can hurt you..evry little bit counts
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 08:18 PM
  #11  
taikowaza's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 784
Likes: 1
From: Dakotas
I'll look into it!

tacoma750 and elripster...you've got me thinking! you could do all the hills in san diego in 5th gear with a/c on and people in? hmmm. don't think I could do the hills of seattle under those conditions...in fact I wouldn't even try it coming up from pike place market I have to be in 1st or second those hills are damn steep I am not from cali but I would say seattle and san fran have some pretty similar hills...never been to san diego but I guess it's steep too?
seems like I'm on my own thinking that 4.88 is not enough for the 33 manual so I will replace my taped wires (got burned on the headers!) and maybe that will help a bit! I checked on prices for regearing and it's completely out of the question...4.88 it stays! and...good to hear that you're happy with your 33/4.88 combo, I will enjoy the sweet setup I already have and stop bit&^ing
about my ratios!! ha thanks for the patience it's good to have this kind of support and encouragement! YT=primo
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 08:19 PM
  #12  
strykersd's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 569
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by elripster
I ran 33's with 4.56's and 4.88's. The 4.88's were perfect. You might make sure your engine is in good tune. I could pull all the hills in San Diego in 5th gear with the AC on and people in my '89 3.0 with 33's and 4.88's. As it is, 4.88's leave you about 6% under geared.
Even up the 52 West? My 4runner with stock tires and AC couldn't do that...

Oh and if your gears aren't enough for your tires, isn't that undergeared instead of overgeared?
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 08:20 PM
  #13  
Tacoma750's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
i want 4:88s for my toyota But i am gonna be running 37s lol (i have a motorswap) Im looking for someones stock third members....even 4:56s would do.
But for YOU...redo those wires man! wires and some platnum plugs
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 08:27 PM
  #14  
taikowaza's Avatar
Thread Starter
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 784
Likes: 1
From: Dakotas
elripster!

hey elripster just noticed that you're frank from sdori I love my coil spacers thanks for having those custom cut to 1" for me...also bj spacers rock thanks again man.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007 | 08:50 PM
  #15  
CJM's Avatar
CJM
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,940
Likes: 2
From: Central NJ
YOu actually went taller but less wide, that could have some effect ya know.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
r3dfish
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners (Build-Up Section)
54
May 16, 2016 10:31 PM
nonstop
General Vehicle Related Topics (Non Year Related)
7
Aug 11, 2015 09:26 AM
deepmarsh
84-85 Trucks & 4Runners
5
Aug 6, 2015 03:44 AM
jaretstuff
Axles - Suspensions - Tires - Wheels
1
Aug 4, 2015 02:08 PM
MTLroadierunner
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners
0
Jul 6, 2015 12:17 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:08 AM.