Notices
86-95 Trucks & 4Runners 2nd/3rd gen pickups, and 1st/2nd gen 4Runners with IFS

Which is the best deal?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 28, 2007 | 09:46 AM
  #1  
JEDI87's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
From: Gardnerville,Nv./South Lake Tahoe
Which is the best deal?

Since I sold my 87 we've been looking for another daily driver. My wife wants a 99 Jetta but I've never delt with them before and am hearing bad things so I found these. I am leaning towrds the 95 which has a new motor with paperwork and has a small dent by the tail light and about a 1' crease in the dr side door, no biggie though. I just found the 94 and will go look at both today. The 94 has 150,*** with 10,000 on the rebuild.
http://sacramento.craigslist.org/car/336925713.html
http://sacramento.craigslist.org/car/339516852.html

Last edited by JEDI87; May 28, 2007 at 09:47 AM.
Reply
Old May 28, 2007 | 10:06 AM
  #2  
shantz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: virginia
why would you want the Jetta unless it is a diesel?
I would go with a Camry, many good used ones out there
Reply
Old May 28, 2007 | 10:08 AM
  #3  
JEDI87's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
From: Gardnerville,Nv./South Lake Tahoe
My wife has wanted one for awhile, I'm not into them. I don't like the way camry's look, might be reliable but I want something that looks good too.
Reply
Old May 28, 2007 | 10:12 AM
  #4  
budddavid's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
either go for a yota or honda, you will get much better MPG and I know I would want to get the best MPG for a daily driver. I have known two people that had jettas, not sure of the years, but one was a lemon, kept breaking down over and over again. the other one he did not keep it past a year cause he did not like it.
Reply
Old May 28, 2007 | 10:17 AM
  #5  
Paul H.'s Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,454
Likes: 10
From: Eastern NC
I hate to say this but a V6 4Runner is not a good daily driver vehicle since you will be lucky to get 15mpg in city driving. You already have 2 4runners.
Is your wife going to be driving it or you?
Reply
Old May 28, 2007 | 10:18 AM
  #6  
spaugh's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Everyone I know with a VW or Audi (same engines) have had nothing but trouble with them. They look ok, but are just not reliable cars. Plus they cost more to fix than a Japanese car.

As as the runners you found, may I suggest you find a 96 and get the 3.4L V6 instead of the 3.0. I think you would be happier with a 3rd gen.
Reply
Old May 28, 2007 | 10:22 AM
  #7  
JEDI87's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
From: Gardnerville,Nv./South Lake Tahoe
I know i would like the 3.4 better but I only have the $5,000 from the 87 to play with right now. I have had a 91 runner and it was nice but the previous owner had abused the engine so I had to put some work into it. I would be driving i mostly. I did find a 96 runner with the 3.4 with 168,000 on it for $5,500 obo so I want to look at it on Wednesday if I don't find something else soon. We're down to 1 car right now as my formula has the new engine sitting next to it.

http://sfbay.craigslist.org/nby/car/338372028.html

Last edited by JEDI87; May 28, 2007 at 10:33 AM.
Reply
Old May 28, 2007 | 10:26 AM
  #8  
TNRabbit's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,787
Likes: 36
From: TENN Native Languishing in Virginia
I had a Jetta & a Golf GTI back in the 80s. They were pretty good, but the Japanese cars beat the pants off them in reliability & fuel economy. The only area the VW's were better was the steering was a LOT more precise (poor man's BMW)...

I've owned two Honda Civics & they were the most reliable autos I've ever had.
Reply
Old May 28, 2007 | 10:31 AM
  #9  
JEDI87's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
From: Gardnerville,Nv./South Lake Tahoe
Yeah, the deal on the Jetta fell through anyway so we're not going to look at anymore of them. We need a 5 seater for the kids too.

Last edited by JEDI87; May 28, 2007 at 10:47 AM.
Reply
Old May 28, 2007 | 11:33 AM
  #10  
ewong's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 3
From: Philly PA
I own a MKII (85-92) Golf.
IMHO the MKII chassis (93-99) are to be avoided unless yer a die hard VW fan. Swapping a MKIII motor into a MKII chassis tho is a different story
Reply
Old May 28, 2007 | 12:01 PM
  #11  
KevinInSac's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 6
From: Sacramento, CA (Carmichael)
Ugh, leather. I get bad enough swamp ass with my cloth seats. Sad to see the first gen go.
Reply
Old May 28, 2007 | 12:35 PM
  #12  
Robrt32's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 413
Likes: 1
From: Mississippi
I noticed in the first post with the runners for sale, the guy wanted to trade for a jeep.. that might euro ........LMAO.....sorry about that, i couldn't help it.. trading a Toy for a JEEP... That just makes me shiver!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply
Old May 28, 2007 | 04:54 PM
  #13  
trythis's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City
If you want a VW make sure you get the TDI. They have problems, but they get 50 MPG on the highway.
Reply
Old May 28, 2007 | 05:36 PM
  #14  
CJM's Avatar
CJM
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,940
Likes: 2
From: Central NJ
Junk, toyota or honda..there is no other.
Reply
Old May 28, 2007 | 09:09 PM
  #15  
Sonofmayhem's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,671
Likes: 0
From: Springs, Colorado
Definently get the 3.4 over the 3.0 or 2.4 Just too much to deal with to get a simple power increase. If it were i, id get the 96, throw in dual arbs, a crawler box a lift 33s and skids and call it the ultimate D.D.
Reply
Old May 28, 2007 | 09:17 PM
  #16  
KevinInSac's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 6
From: Sacramento, CA (Carmichael)
Originally Posted by Sonofmayhem
Definently get the 3.4 over the 3.0 or 2.4 Just too much to deal with to get a simple power increase. If it were i, id get the 96, throw in dual arbs, a crawler box a lift 33s and skids and call it the ultimate D.D.
Haha, that's my ultimate goal.
Reply
Old May 28, 2007 | 09:22 PM
  #17  
pius222's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Daily driver? I'll look into a good MPG car than the 4Runner since you already has at least one. Accord or camry still would be a very smart purchase.
Reply
Old May 29, 2007 | 04:08 PM
  #18  
JEDI87's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
From: Gardnerville,Nv./South Lake Tahoe
I'm not too concerned about mileage as I was just driving the 87 daily and it got between 18-25 mpg's deoending on how I drove it. The 95 from above had rust all over and the engine was actually just swapped in from a different runner, so I was going to look at the 94 and it sold while I was looking at the 95.
Reply
Old May 29, 2007 | 05:03 PM
  #19  
Guardian_Saint's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 471
Likes: 1
From: California
Don't bash yourself for that, go to http://www.autotrader.com and you'll see lots of 2nd toyota 4runner.

Last edited by Guardian_Saint; May 29, 2007 at 05:30 PM.
Reply
Old May 29, 2007 | 06:37 PM
  #20  
JEDI87's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
From: Gardnerville,Nv./South Lake Tahoe
Yep, done that too, there's nothing around here right now.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:14 PM.