Site Feedback Please use this forum to provide feedback, suggestions on the site
View Poll Results: Allow sig file pictures on the forum?
Yes, as long as they are moderated like the avatars are
10
34.48%
Nope, keep sig file pics for members away
19
65.52%
Voters: 29. You may not vote on this poll

Feedback for sigfile pictures

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 3, 2008 | 01:45 AM
  #1  
Corey's Avatar
Thread Starter
Co-Founder/Administrator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 32,242
Likes: 21
From: Auburn, Washington
Feedback for sigfile pictures

This has been brought up in the past, I have had a few ask me about it again.

A very popular FJ Cruiser forum I use allows the pictures.
All members get them, and Contributing Members there get a slightly larger one up to 600x200 pixels.

Mine below is 512x200.
I think 550x200 maximum might be OK if we want to run with this.

What are your thoughts?

Another advantage would be for vendors to put a banner of their business in the sig.

PS, sig file pic is gone now, but this is what it looked like.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2008 | 05:16 AM
  #2  
Belize Off Road Team's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,850
Likes: 1
From: Edmonton, Alberta
I'm not a big fan of having a bunch of pics all over the place. Aren't avatars enough? It adds to much junk to a thread and if banners start going up for vendors it would start to get irritating in my opinion. And wouldn't it make pop ups worse?
my 2 cents
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2008 | 06:30 AM
  #3  
Godzilla's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,171
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver
Pictures in sigs can get annoying as it takes away from thread content and may be very off topic. We already have some members with huge sigs and thats just text! So if we add to it and we can see that someone did an ISR, and their mud-flap mod, the synthetic oil mod, and have an aftermarket shifter knob, and then a few babbling quotes...plus a picture.?/?
Maybe if there was some way to allocate X amount of lines, whether it be text, or image, or even both...but not exceeding a reasonable number of lines.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2008 | 06:40 AM
  #4  
pauliep13's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Dallas
Nah...

I have DSL at the house and even then navigating a pic heavy thread takes long enough. Dial up might become a nightmare this way. Adding more pics to the signature might slow things down a lot. Also, a pic heavy thread gets confusing enough, no need to clutter it up any more.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2008 | 06:42 AM
  #5  
Fink's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,076
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
I think it looks good and can add to the persons sig, however I have a couple concerns.

There are people that tend to make comments about other members sigs in the most random threads.
It can be a random thread about brownies vs cookies and somebody will post up, "Hey dude, that's a sweet truck in your sig...how much lift you got?"

Also, as stated before, the overall size of the sig can become a nuisance.

At first, it can become cluttering and make it hard to navigate but I have gotten used to it on some other forums.
Oddly, I think the black background that is offered here helps a lot.

Fink

Last edited by Fink; Jul 3, 2008 at 06:48 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2008 | 06:56 AM
  #6  
Corey's Avatar
Thread Starter
Co-Founder/Administrator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 32,242
Likes: 21
From: Auburn, Washington
Yes, I really use to not like them.
But after seeing them and using them (same pic I have now) over on the FJ site I use, I have gotten use to it, and it does not phase me one bit when reading threads.

But that is what we are here for, to get feedback on this.

And some are still on dialup?
I thought most were out of the dark ages by now
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2008 | 07:03 AM
  #7  
Fink's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,076
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
I don't think catering to Dial-Up is very relevant this day and age. You have to market to the masses...the masses are on high speed.

Fink
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2008 | 07:46 AM
  #8  
zlathim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 4
I personally don't like the sig line pics. It makes the threads slower to load and more cumbersome to read. I frequent sites that allow them and I really don't like them.

Please don't allow them.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2008 | 08:40 AM
  #9  
Djlarroc's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
I agree with the rest. I think it will just make more clutter and leave open for off topic questions like Fink said.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2008 | 09:20 AM
  #10  
crolison's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,571
Likes: 2
From: TN
we already have avatars... i think thats good enough
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 08:51 AM
  #11  
Corey's Avatar
Thread Starter
Co-Founder/Administrator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 32,242
Likes: 21
From: Auburn, Washington


This poll will close on 07-17-2008 at 02:46 AM

Until then, I will leave up my pic in my sig for an example.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 10:49 PM
  #12  
rocket's Avatar
Contributing Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,683
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
I'm against it for a few reasons.

1. looks tacky.
2. that whats threads and posts are for.
3. moderating them would be another hassle.
4. build-up threads start looking like crap.
5. other threads lose value and easily get off topic and also start looking like crap.
6. makes it harder sifting/reading through any thread.
7. they become clutter and distracting.
8. thats what avatars are for.
9. having links + text in sigs is more than enough.
10. sig pics should have never been thought of.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2008 | 02:03 PM
  #13  
Psalm 112's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque
Originally Posted by rocket
I'm against it for a few reasons.

1. looks tacky.
2. that whats threads and posts are for.
3. moderating them would be another hassle.
4. build-up threads start looking like crap.
5. other threads lose value and easily get off topic and also start looking like crap.
6. makes it harder sifting/reading through any thread.
7. they become clutter and distracting.
8. thats what avatars are for.
9. having links + text in sigs is more than enough.
10. sig pics should have never been thought of.
X2 on each of these. Besides, if you're AVATAR photo isn't enough, you could put a link in your SIG line to link others to your photos in the photo gallery if needed...

Last edited by Psalm 112; Jul 9, 2008 at 02:04 PM. Reason: oops
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2008 | 02:11 PM
  #14  
Elvota's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,415
Likes: 10
From: Phx, AZ
My bias is towards pictureless sig lines as well... but maybe I am a bit boring.

I concur with others, no pics gives a cleaner look, easier to scroll through board.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2008 | 05:55 PM
  #15  
nc994run's Avatar
Contributing Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
From: raleigh, nc for school chapel hill, nc for home
I'm not sure how many people do this, but I tend to check YT from my phone when I'm not going to be around my computer for a while. Sig pics would take way too long to load and make it slower in general to visit YT
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2008 | 12:42 AM
  #16  
Corey's Avatar
Thread Starter
Co-Founder/Administrator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 32,242
Likes: 21
From: Auburn, Washington
That is a very good point.
Many here surf from their phones from what I have been informed.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2008 | 05:56 AM
  #17  
Brenjen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 1
From: Searcy, Arkansas
Originally Posted by rocket
I'm against it for a few reasons.

1. looks tacky

6. makes it harder sifting/reading through any thread

7. they become clutter and distracting

9. having links + text in sigs is more than enough
I agree with those points. Of course it's subjective as to what's tacky or not but still.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2008 | 05:47 PM
  #18  
dropzone's Avatar
Fossilized
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 19,771
Likes: 456
From: PNW
like mentioned previously, that is why we have avatars...
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2008 | 06:14 PM
  #19  
TOYOTA 1's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,799
Likes: 3
From: oregon
Originally Posted by rocket
I'm against it for a few reasons.

1. looks tacky.
2. that whats threads and posts are for.
3. moderating them would be another hassle.
4. build-up threads start looking like crap.
5. other threads lose value and easily get off topic and also start looking like crap.
6. makes it harder sifting/reading through any thread.
7. they become clutter and distracting.
8. thats what avatars are for.
9. having links + text in sigs is more than enough.
10. sig pics should have never been thought of.
x2......
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2008 | 06:16 PM
  #20  
woodendude's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, On.
Nice rig Corey, is that a rooftop tent on there and what tires are you running?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:52 AM.