3 Link my 4Runner NO MORE Panhard bar
#61
Originally Posted by 93_Runner
That looks awesome man. Hope that all turns out well so others can do the same thing.
#62
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nice fab work on those lower links. How are you planning to mount the coil-overs? 1:1, I assume? Are you going to bring them up into the cab or angle them to keep them under the floorboards? I wonder if you adapt something like this to your rear suspension. Sean and I built that setup for our '89 4Runner a while ago and it's worked out pretty well.
#63
Originally Posted by JESSE_at_TLT
Nice fab work on those lower links. How are you planning to mount the coil-overs? 1:1, I assume? Are you going to bring them up into the cab or angle them to keep them under the floorboards? I wonder if you adapt something like this to your rear suspension. Sean and I built that setup for our '89 4Runner a while ago and it's worked out pretty well.
Since I have 1-1/2" body lift and now plenty of space I would like to keep them under the floor. With this set-up I hope to get 14"-15" of travel.
#64
Originally Posted by JESSE_at_TLT
Nice fab work on those lower links. How are you planning to mount the coil-overs? 1:1, I assume? Are you going to bring them up into the cab or angle them to keep them under the floorboards? I wonder if you adapt something like this to your rear suspension. Sean and I built that setup for our '89 4Runner a while ago and it's worked out pretty well.
Last edited by Scottz; 08-03-2005 at 06:55 PM.
#65
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No, that 4Runner doesn't have a body lift. I would strongly urge you to angle the shocks back instead of inward at the top, especially since it seems like you drive your truck at high speeds off-road as often as low speeds. The shocks will be much more effective at dampening side-to-side loads...
#66
Registered User
Hey Jesse,
What angle do the shocks rest at on that 4runner at ride height?
I'm doing simialr and want to keep them as vertical as possible. I think we're going to chop out the whole spare tire carrier crossmember so we will have lots of room to play with.
What angle do the shocks rest at on that 4runner at ride height?
I'm doing simialr and want to keep them as vertical as possible. I think we're going to chop out the whole spare tire carrier crossmember so we will have lots of room to play with.
#67
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't remember the angle at ride-height off the top of my head, but they're at almost exactly 45-degrees on full compression, which is where it really matters. We used a 12" shock to get about 13" of wheel-travel and I wouldn't want to use a longer shock or lay them over any more. Oh, and you won't need to remove the spare tire carrier either.
You might consider using short-bodied Bilstein 7100 shocks instead of 2.5" remote reservoir RaceRunner shocks (shortest eye-to-eye 2.5" shock) if you want to improve the ground clearance or squeeze a little more travel out of this type of setup. Personally, I'd gladly trade a few inches of wheel travel for better dampening. What type of leaf-springs are you using? If you're looking for more than 13-14" of wheel-travel, you're going to need to use a set of leafsprings longer than a Tacoma pack (57.5") and then you're going to need to bring the shocks up through the floor or build a complicated cantilever system.
I sent the blueprints for these shock mounts over to Brian at Front Range and he's planning on adding them to his product line. These parts are easy enough for anyone to make/copy, but a kit for 84-95.5" trucks will be available soon and should eliminate the guesswork and save some time.
You might consider using short-bodied Bilstein 7100 shocks instead of 2.5" remote reservoir RaceRunner shocks (shortest eye-to-eye 2.5" shock) if you want to improve the ground clearance or squeeze a little more travel out of this type of setup. Personally, I'd gladly trade a few inches of wheel travel for better dampening. What type of leaf-springs are you using? If you're looking for more than 13-14" of wheel-travel, you're going to need to use a set of leafsprings longer than a Tacoma pack (57.5") and then you're going to need to bring the shocks up through the floor or build a complicated cantilever system.
I sent the blueprints for these shock mounts over to Brian at Front Range and he's planning on adding them to his product line. These parts are easy enough for anyone to make/copy, but a kit for 84-95.5" trucks will be available soon and should eliminate the guesswork and save some time.
#68
Registered User
I'm using the 62" leafs that deavr makes for the Tundra overaxle application. Last I checked tehy were cycling 15-151/2" Still making soem changes though. 15" is plenty for what I do.
#69
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sounds like a good setup. What are you using for shackles? To get 15" of travel I'd be looking to run at least a 14" shock on a slight angle or running 16" shocks more upright.
#70
Registered User
Sorry to Hijak...last post about my lame truck.
I'm running the 12" under the bed. A little more raked than your runner, but the valving is super stiff anyway. Gonna have to revalve them. My mounts are higher up on the axle tube as well for clearance.
I'm running the 12" under the bed. A little more raked than your runner, but the valving is super stiff anyway. Gonna have to revalve them. My mounts are higher up on the axle tube as well for clearance.
#71
Originally Posted by JESSE_at_TLT
No, that 4Runner doesn't have a body lift. I would strongly urge you to angle the shocks back instead of inward at the top, especially since it seems like you drive your truck at high speeds off-road as often as low speeds. The shocks will be much more effective at dampening side-to-side loads...
Last edited by Scottz; 08-04-2005 at 06:46 PM.
#72
Originally Posted by 93_Runner
Do you have any more pics of the total suspension travel that you get out of this setup? Most of the pics you have are of the stuff side. I would like to know how much droop you get compared to the stock setup.
Nice 4Runner.
Nice 4Runner.
Last edited by Scottz; 09-05-2005 at 09:56 AM.
#73
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Corona, Ca
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You won't have to worry about mounting your shocks inward, I would agree with "Jesse at TLT" if you had leaf springs, but you don't so you shouldn't have any problems with it at all. And if you got a body lift and put the shocks close to where stock shock went but with more room to extend them closer to the floor they will fit fine, do to the body lift giving the added floor hieght (12"shocks only).
I see you did the 3-link set-up you posted about doing this 7 months ago. Great job!!! https://www.yotatech.com/forums/f31/remove-pan-rod-bar-4runner-42368/ Funny how it looks like the set up I emailed the pictures of to you. I've done 2 more of these since then and never had any problem with them and as far as the side loading on your verticle hiem you will never have a problem with it that heim has a shear load of 125,000 or more so I don't think your 4Runner could break it. You would most likly break an axle or wheel before you could stress one of those bad boy's, and your right most race trucks run them Vert. Great thead by the way and I like the way you explain everything.
I see you did the 3-link set-up you posted about doing this 7 months ago. Great job!!! https://www.yotatech.com/forums/f31/remove-pan-rod-bar-4runner-42368/ Funny how it looks like the set up I emailed the pictures of to you. I've done 2 more of these since then and never had any problem with them and as far as the side loading on your verticle hiem you will never have a problem with it that heim has a shear load of 125,000 or more so I don't think your 4Runner could break it. You would most likly break an axle or wheel before you could stress one of those bad boy's, and your right most race trucks run them Vert. Great thead by the way and I like the way you explain everything.
Last edited by RaceTaco; 08-04-2005 at 07:32 PM.
#74
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Scottz
Yeah I was going to do that until I noticed it would not allow room for a fuel tank to go there so I decided not to, And don't shocks just float along with the axle controling only the damping and rebond of the spring rate cycling up and down. I don't now but I noticed some race cars and trucks with them inward just like my stock factory shocks where mounted so I think I will be alright but thanks for the info and I'll reseach it more before I do it.
Does that help?
#75
Contributing Member
Would it be possible to make one of these to sell? I'd gladly buy a "kit" from you, as I don't have my own tools and whatnot. The 3 link sounds like it's a great improvement over the panhard bar!
#76
Originally Posted by Keggo
Would it be possible to make one of these to sell? I'd gladly buy a "kit" from you, as I don't have my own tools and whatnot. The 3 link sounds like it's a great improvement over the panhard bar!
#79
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Deep Gap, NC
Posts: 4,697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Keggo
I too would be interested in buying this kit. I'll be running FJ80 coils.
When you installed this it sounds like you did the shocks and upper link at the same time. Doing this resulted in only one thing: your new shocks are now(hopefully) the new limiting factor to travel.
I would have been more interested in finding out what the stock links allowed in travel without shocks. And, then compare that to the new system without shocks. This would have really told me how much the stock arms were really limiting the travel.
I understand that there's some other inherent benefits to not running the panhard bar, but my main reason to attempting this mod would have been more travel, which in most cases isn't limited by the links, but rather by the location and length of your shocks.
Chris
#80
What I Gained with 3Link
Originally Posted by ravencr
My question would be how much more did this kit extend the travel, excluding the shocks?
When you installed this it sounds like you did the shocks and upper link at the same time. Doing this resulted in only one thing: your new shocks are now(hopefully) the new limiting factor to travel.
I would have been more interested in finding out what the stock links allowed in travel without shocks. And, then compare that to the new system without shocks. This would have really told me how much the stock arms were really limiting the travel.
I understand that there's some other inherent benefits to not running the panhard bar, but my main reason to attempting this mod would have been more travel, which in most cases isn't limited by the links, but rather by the location and length of your shocks.
Chris
When you installed this it sounds like you did the shocks and upper link at the same time. Doing this resulted in only one thing: your new shocks are now(hopefully) the new limiting factor to travel.
I would have been more interested in finding out what the stock links allowed in travel without shocks. And, then compare that to the new system without shocks. This would have really told me how much the stock arms were really limiting the travel.
I understand that there's some other inherent benefits to not running the panhard bar, but my main reason to attempting this mod would have been more travel, which in most cases isn't limited by the links, but rather by the location and length of your shocks.
Chris
I have to disagree about the shocks being the only limiting factor although they are a large part of it, when I started this project it was clear that if I was going to increase the travel I would have to get rid of the panhard bar and all the stock rubber mounted links, they start to bind up at 11" of travel and it was clear to me that the rubber inside the links would start to rip apart since they don't pivot and twist instead, and once the panhard bar swings everthing to the right it would make my drive shaft rub my gas tank and left tire rub the frame which also limited it.
Another factor is the coil spring, My Downey HDs start to drop out of the spring buckets at 12" and yeah I could put a spring spacer in there so it would give me alittle more drop, but in doing so I would have to limit the up travel so I don't bind the coil under bottoming which then wouldn't be any gain in travel.
So in short I had 11" with stock links and 12" travel shocks , and with 3link I got 14" with it being limited to 12" as of now but not for long!!!.
3link got 3" travel gain over stock and alot of other possibiltes are now out there, like my recently installed Aux Gas Tank.
Heres NEW PIC's
Last edited by Scottz; 09-26-2005 at 07:34 PM.